User talk:W Baskerville

Welcome

Hello, W Baskerville, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akram Safa (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akram Safa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Akram Safa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, W Baskerville! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline

Hello, W Baskerville. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 10:16, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Akram Safa (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StraussInTheHouse was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Akram Safa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Akram Safa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 16:22, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  MER-C 09:56, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

W Baskerville (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I request my account to be unblocked as its purpose is not advertising focused. Regarding the Carmignac entry, I had noticed the remarks posted on top of the article and was working on a revised text more in phase with Wikipedia standards. I'm sorry it was considered as a disguised way of promotion. I will accept all advices to adjust the text to a more neutral approach. In the meantime, I would like to contribute to other topics, less corporations focused. I'm sorry for this misunderstanding. (W Baskerville (talk) 13:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC))

Decline reason:

It's not a misunderstanding. You've clearly been violating WP:PROMO and WP:COI and, I suspect, WP:PAID. Thanks but no thanks, we have no interest in the sorts of edits you are pushing on us. Yamla (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

W Baskerville (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What I do not understand in your refusal is the global suspicion about the purpose of my account. I do not get paid for contributions. Another page I wrote was also suspended without notice. Is there a bias regarding French companies? I do . ot get the "promotion" issue. From this standpoint any entry regarding any company is basically promotion. I don not agree at all with your the conflict of interest issue either. I'm not writing about one single company or person. I request once again a revision of the administrators position. best regards, W Baskerville (talk) 09:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Since you don't even concede that there are issues with your edits, there is no pathway to being unblocked for you, and you must remain blocked to protect Wikipedia from your inappropriate edits. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 10:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

W Baskerville (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I recognize I might have violated WP:PROMO. The presentation of the company was way too flattering. Is there a way to review the contribution in a neutral way? Can I benefit from advices from the contributors community? W Baskerville (talk) 09:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I recognize I might have violated [[WP:PROMO]]. The presentation of the company was way too flattering. Is there a way to review the contribution in a neutral way? Can I benefit from advices from the contributors community? [[User:W Baskerville|W Baskerville]] ([[User talk:W Baskerville#top|talk]]) 09:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I recognize I might have violated [[WP:PROMO]]. The presentation of the company was way too flattering. Is there a way to review the contribution in a neutral way? Can I benefit from advices from the contributors community? [[User:W Baskerville|W Baskerville]] ([[User talk:W Baskerville#top|talk]]) 09:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I recognize I might have violated [[WP:PROMO]]. The presentation of the company was way too flattering. Is there a way to review the contribution in a neutral way? Can I benefit from advices from the contributors community? [[User:W Baskerville|W Baskerville]] ([[User talk:W Baskerville#top|talk]]) 09:34, 20 August 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}