User talk:Dino245: Difference between revisions
Ohnoitsjamie (talk | contribs) final warning |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Archives}} |
{{Archives}} |
||
= Hello. = |
= Hello. = |
||
=== If you would like to leave me a message. Please be kind, use common sense, no SPAM, and no harassment. === |
=== If you would like to leave me a message. Please be kind, use common sense, no SPAM, and no harassment. === |
||
<!--Please leave all messages below this line.--> |
<!--Please leave all messages below this line.--> |
||
== October 2019 == |
== October 2019 == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for persistently making [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive edits]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. '''[[User:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Eagles247|<font face="Verdana" color="003B48" size="2px">24/7</font>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/Eagles247|<font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)</font>]] 20:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-disruptblock --> |
||
== Please explain this before resuming vandalism patrol (bringing back from archive) == |
== Please explain this before resuming vandalism patrol (bringing back from archive) == |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | I'm concerned that you do not have enough experience to be making GA nominations and patrolling for vandalism. This is not you first problem; I see a lot of issues above here. |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | I'm concerned that you do not have enough experience to be making GA nominations and patrolling for vandalism. This is not you first problem; I see a lot of issues above here. I think we need to iron this out first, and there needs to be some agreement on your part to be more careful, before you resume this kind of work. Warning a new editor like that is a good way to lose a potential future contributor. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 17:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
:Let me affirm that I have been waiting for some response to my section above as bad speedy tags is an issue for someone doing vandalism patrol for many of the same reasons Floq stated. I would like to echo the part where they state that we should iron these out. I see no reason to think you are not a contributor in good faith now and so just as we don't want to drive out potential contributors we don't want to drive you out. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 17:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
:Let me affirm that I have been waiting for some response to my section above as bad speedy tags is an issue for someone doing vandalism patrol for many of the same reasons Floq stated. I would like to echo the part where they state that we should iron these out. I see no reason to think you are not a contributor in good faith now and so just as we don't want to drive out potential contributors we don't want to drive you out. Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 17:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | ::I agree with Barkeep49 that we don't want to drive you out, but I also feel that this is important enough that it cannot be ignored or archived without reply. |
||
⚫ | ::I agree with Barkeep49 that we don't want to drive you out, but I also feel that this is important enough that it cannot be ignored or archived without reply. Please do not edit anything after your block expires until we have had a chance to discuss the report at AIV and the bad speedy tags. If you resume editing before this is resolved, I will block you indefinitely until you do start discussing. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam|talk]]) 20:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
== November 2019 == |
== November 2019 == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|abusing multiple accounts]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|may be reverted or deleted]]. |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|abusing multiple accounts]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|may be reverted or deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. [[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 23:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
||
{{UTRS-unblock-user|27532|Nov 08, 2019 20:53:45|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 20:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC) |
{{UTRS-unblock-user|27532|Nov 08, 2019 20:53:45|closed}}--[[User:UTRSBot|UTRSBot]] ([[User talk:UTRSBot|talk]]) 20:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock|reason=The INDEFINITE block due to "illegit sock puppetery" happened a few days after I registered [[User:Dinan8]] as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to [[WP:SOCK]]. See the UTRS ticket above for details. '''Please also ping [[User:Begoon]], [[User:Ohnoitsjamie]], [[User:Eagles247]], [[User:Bbb23]], [[User:Barkeep49]] and [[User:Floquenbeam]]. Thank you very much and assume good faith to the admin that reviews this request.}} |
{{unblock|reason=The INDEFINITE block due to "illegit sock puppetery" happened a few days after I registered [[User:Dinan8]] as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to [[WP:SOCK]]. See the UTRS ticket above for details. '''Please also ping [[User:Begoon]], [[User:Ohnoitsjamie]], [[User:Eagles247]], [[User:Bbb23]], [[User:Barkeep49]] and [[User:Floquenbeam]]. Thank you very much and assume good faith to the admin that reviews this request.}} |
||
: Not everyone has access to UTRS. You'll need to provider an explanation here. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
: Not everyone has access to UTRS. You'll need to provider an explanation here. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|User:Ohnoitsjamie}} Can you please paste my explanation form the UnBlock ticket I submitted today? I accidentally lost access to it an I don't want to write down an explanation all over again. [[User:Dino245|Dino245]] ([[User talk:Dino245#top|talk]]) 00:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
:{{ping|User:Ohnoitsjamie}} Can you please paste my explanation form the UnBlock ticket I submitted today? I accidentally lost access to it an I don't want to write down an explanation all over again. [[User:Dino245|Dino245]] ([[User talk:Dino245#top|talk]]) 00:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: The only substance to your UTRS request was "This happened a few days after I registered [[User:Dinan8]] as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to [[WP:SOCK]]." <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
:: The only substance to your UTRS request was "This happened a few days after I registered [[User:Dinan8]] as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to [[WP:SOCK]]." <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | ::: Well, allow me to retort: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dinan8&diff=prev&oldid=924422286 You created this account] ''very'' shortly after this one was blocked for 31 hours (might even be some overlap), then you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Greek_sentiment&diff=prev&oldid=925053818 vandalized] with this one, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Sock_No._4570 this one]. Oh, and this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=NZI_GRMY totally legit alternate account] as well. |
||
⚫ | ::: Well, allow me to retort: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dinan8&diff=prev&oldid=924422286 You created this account] ''very'' shortly after this one was blocked for 31 hours (might even be some overlap), then you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anti-Greek_sentiment&diff=prev&oldid=925053818 vandalized] with this one, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=Sock_No._4570 this one]. Oh, and this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=NZI_GRMY totally legit alternate account] as well. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 00:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. |
||
⚫ | [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please [[Wikipedia:Assume good faith|assume good faith]] in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. <!-- Template:uw-agf3 --> [[User:Dino245|Dino245]] ([[User talk:Dino245#top|talk]]) 02:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
: Seriously? That's how you explain your sockpuppet edits, like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karl_Lagerfeld&diff=prev&oldid=925113478 this gem]? <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
: Seriously? That's how you explain your sockpuppet edits, like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Karl_Lagerfeld&diff=prev&oldid=925113478 this gem]? <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: For the last time, you ''do not get to alter or remove others' comments while you are blocked'' Do so again and you'll lose your talk page access. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
:: For the last time, you ''do not get to alter or remove others' comments while you are blocked'' Do so again and you'll lose your talk page access. <b>[[User:Ohnoitsjamie|OhNo<span style="color: #D47C14;">itsJamie</span>]] [[User talk:Ohnoitsjamie|<sup>Talk</sup>]]</b> 02:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:18, 9 November 2019
|
|
Hello.
If you would like to leave me a message. Please be kind, use common sense, no SPAM, and no harassment.
October 2019
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:22, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
Please explain this before resuming vandalism patrol (bringing back from archive)
What is with this AIV report (and the warning you gave them on their user page)? They've done nothing except leave an AGF userbox on their user page.
I'm concerned that you do not have enough experience to be making GA nominations and patrolling for vandalism. This is not you first problem; I see a lot of issues above here. I think we need to iron this out first, and there needs to be some agreement on your part to be more careful, before you resume this kind of work. Warning a new editor like that is a good way to lose a potential future contributor. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Let me affirm that I have been waiting for some response to my section above as bad speedy tags is an issue for someone doing vandalism patrol for many of the same reasons Floq stated. I would like to echo the part where they state that we should iron these out. I see no reason to think you are not a contributor in good faith now and so just as we don't want to drive out potential contributors we don't want to drive you out. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:19, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- I agree with Barkeep49 that we don't want to drive you out, but I also feel that this is important enough that it cannot be ignored or archived without reply. Please do not edit anything after your block expires until we have had a chance to discuss the report at AIV and the bad speedy tags. If you resume editing before this is resolved, I will block you indefinitely until you do start discussing. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Dino245 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #27532 was submitted on Nov 08, 2019 20:53:45. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
Dino245 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The INDEFINITE block due to "illegit sock puppetery" happened a few days after I registered [[User:Dinan8]] as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to [[WP:SOCK]]. See the UTRS ticket above for details. '''Please also ping [[User:Begoon]], [[User:Ohnoitsjamie]], [[User:Eagles247]], [[User:Bbb23]], [[User:Barkeep49]] and [[User:Floquenbeam]]. Thank you very much and assume good faith to the admin that reviews this request. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=The INDEFINITE block due to "illegit sock puppetery" happened a few days after I registered [[User:Dinan8]] as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to [[WP:SOCK]]. See the UTRS ticket above for details. '''Please also ping [[User:Begoon]], [[User:Ohnoitsjamie]], [[User:Eagles247]], [[User:Bbb23]], [[User:Barkeep49]] and [[User:Floquenbeam]]. Thank you very much and assume good faith to the admin that reviews this request. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=The INDEFINITE block due to "illegit sock puppetery" happened a few days after I registered [[User:Dinan8]] as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to [[WP:SOCK]]. See the UTRS ticket above for details. '''Please also ping [[User:Begoon]], [[User:Ohnoitsjamie]], [[User:Eagles247]], [[User:Bbb23]], [[User:Barkeep49]] and [[User:Floquenbeam]]. Thank you very much and assume good faith to the admin that reviews this request. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Not everyone has access to UTRS. You'll need to provider an explanation here. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:21, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Ohnoitsjamie: Can you please paste my explanation form the UnBlock ticket I submitted today? I accidentally lost access to it an I don't want to write down an explanation all over again. Dino245 (talk) 00:37, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- The only substance to your UTRS request was "This happened a few days after I registered User:Dinan8 as an alternative account, not an illegitimate sock puppet. Sure I did use multiple accounts, but not in a "abusive" way, according to WP:SOCK." OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:38, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Well, allow me to retort: You created this account very shortly after this one was blocked for 31 hours (might even be some overlap), then you vandalized with this one, and this one. Oh, and this totally legit alternate account as well. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:41, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Dino245 (talk) 02:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Seriously? That's how you explain your sockpuppet edits, like this gem? OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:05, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- For the last time, you do not get to alter or remove others' comments while you are blocked Do so again and you'll lose your talk page access. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:12, 9 November 2019 (UTC)