User talk:Praxidicae

Merry Xmas!

Merry Christmas everybody!!!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

James The Bond 007 (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Paid advocacy

Dear Praxidicae, I have chosen to create this topic randomly. I am not an employee of this concern, nor working for its promotion. I found required citation for the article. So have created one. To clarify you clearly either directly or indirectly i get any compensation for my edits. It was my own decision to create this article.bothumanized talk

Mantra Softech

Hello, Praxidicae. You have new messages at Wesleyner7's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re:

Because it is a LTA in zh.wiki(zh:Category:坦帕灣光芒460的維基用戶分身),all user blocked in zh.wiki/global lock because their can  Looks like a duck to me.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:56, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

Well stop, MCC214 unless you want to be blocked here too. Praxidicae (talk) 11:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

You don't like I do this,I can stop it.--MCC214#ex umbra in solem 11:38, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Rejected draft CAEplex

Hello Praxidicae. Thank you very much for your time and effort you are giving to Wikipedia. It is due to people like you that he have such a trustful body of knowledge.

I know that you rejected my draft CAEplex due to non-reliable sources and advertisement-like article. I hereby appeal to your experience in order to help me out understand what the article is missing. If you allow me, I would like to explain what I am trying to achieve. First, the kind of solution that CAEplex provides is not know for the vast majority of engineers in the field of Finite element method, which are used to traditional desktop-based software. So I want to spread the base of people that are aware that something like this exists, and the best way to achieve that is through Wikipedia. This is a fact but I cannot cite any source rather than personal experience. On the other hand, there are at least two other similar(ish) platforms that indeed have an accepted entry in Wikipedia, whose sections and content I tried to reproduce in my article. I have now added them to the "See also" section, but they are CONSELF and SimScale. Also, the first and only clod CAD platform, Onshape also has a similar kind of content. I even explicitly avoided adding more screenshots because these other entries do not have any. To sum up, based on your experience and what is your opinion about what the draft CAEplex needs to have in order to be on the same level as these other entries? Once again, thank you very much. Kuroshivo (talk) 09:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

No comment on this issue? I will try to further change the content to match even further other alread-accepted pages and submit the draft again. Kuroshivo (talk) 09:18, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Pace, Architecture, Engineering + Planning

Hi There,

I created the page and see that you have deleted it. In my efforts to create a listing that meets the requirements of Wikipedia, are you able to provide guidance on the expectations of the content? I had thought that I had created a robust and well-sourced article so any comments would be greatly appreciated.

Please don't include text of articles on talk pages. Please read the links given on the draft notice to give you guidance. Praxidicae (talk) 13:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Carsten Isensee

Hi Praxidicae, please, please, please, you have put a "Speedy Deletion" template to the article "Carsten Isensee", which is the new CEO of SEAT. We have not intended to make an advertising or promotional article, simply give information about this person and his responsibility in the most important automobile manufacturing company in Spain. A friend, the editor "Koratai" asked me for help because she had created an incomplete draft, without references or categories. All the CEOs of the big companies are on Wikipedia and we want to write an informative and encyclopedic article with more information and references, but we need time to ask for the collaboration of more editors or seek help in the Wikiproject Biographies. Please give us some time, thank you very much--Pesca59 (talk) 18:32, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Pesca59 I tagged it, I did not delete it, however I strongly advise you read WP:COI and WP:PAID before continuing to edit further and refrain from editing directly about such things in mainspace. Praxidicae (talk) 18:35, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

La Reina Shaw AfD issue

Hi - I saw you reverted my addition of La Reina Shaw at Articles for Deletion. I messed up my edit summaries at both the article page and at today's AfD by failing to include "(2nd nomination)", resulting in broken links. What do I need to do to fix the issue? --Damon Killian (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

• I already fixed it. Praxidicae (talk) 22:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Misunderstanding

Dear you have requested for deleting my article Operation Swift Retort but you have not checked that i have added 4 new references this time how come you have missed that ?

https://www.geo.tv/latest/263717-only-22-urdu-films-released-in-pakistan-in-2019 (They have mentioned that Pakistan released first animated film in 2019 , the film is mentioned) https://dunyanews.tv/en/Entertainment/525076-22-Urdu-films-released-Pakistan-2019- http://mag.dunya.com.pk/index.php/showbiz/1556/2020-01-05 (this is a Urdu Magazine newspaper of Dunya News mentioning about film and detail) https://www.ukfilmreview.co.uk/post/operation-swift-retort-short-film-review (Review about the film)

All references are new how come you have not approved this ? need explanation.

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 08:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

You marked valid edit as Spam

I added good updated content to the RV terms page, you marked as spam. Why? The content is valid the link is good. It has no spam. There are spammy links on the page but the citation I gave was not. Your thoughts?

No you're adding a spam link. Praxidicae (talk) 18:11, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Can you help me understand how this link would be spam?

It only provides information.

It's obvious SEO spam. These "guide" blogs are nothing but spammy seo trash. Praxidicae (talk) 18:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

I think that is harsh. i have over 20 years working in this field and am working hard on great content from question I receive everyday. Have you ever looked at the older content I was updating? It is outdated and the panel info I provided was concise, cited and accurate.

Well you've just answered your own question then. Praxidicae (talk) 18:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

What does that mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:BB09:6A00:3C:C0A:F694:71B4 (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

How are these links any different? Key RV Terms You Need To Know". Maintain My RV. Retrieved 7 July 2015.

https://www.improvesummer.com/best-rv-deep-cycle-battery/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:BB09:6A00:3C:C0A:F694:71B4 (talk) 18:25, 18 January 2020 (UTC) 

My opinion is you just made Wikipedia less informative or will keep content that is not cited. Either way, I disagree, How do I file a complaint? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:BB09:6A00:3C:C0A:F694:71B4 (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Nevermind, I found it. Someone hadn't edited away that content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:BB09:6A00:3C:C0A:F694:71B4 (talk) 18:40, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

You could have been helpful and welcoming to a new user, you were not

Instead of being so terse, you could have helped a new user. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:BB09:6A00:3C:C0A:F694:71B4 (talk) 18:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Regarding article Nitish Bahalwala

I again confirm it was not for advert or promo purpose and had sole intention for people to know about the author whom I have met and have seen the author felicitation.

I have removed the images that may infer the source of conflict of interest and absence of neutral point of view. I request you to suggest me where to remove promotional content that the article achieves its neutral status and no way a promo. Bishal Baishya 14:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishalbaishya2012 (talk • contribs)

I personally assure that I too trust wikipedia to be absent or adverts and will cooperate my best to make it ever expanding encylopedia absent of promos. Bishal Baishya 14:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bishalbaishya2012 (talk • contribs)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising. Praxidicae (talk) 13:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I didnt create this wiki for advertising purposes or for promoting. I'm just trying to make a wiki that has accurate information about "Yuni Wa" for the over 10 million people that have streamed "Yuni Wa's" music. I just want to contribute positively to Wikipedia and make a accurate profile for this notable artist @Praxidicae:.

• No you're writing fabricated nonsense and spamming yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 14:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Regarding articles for "Esther Rose Featherstone" and "Swoove"

Thanks for your feedback. As you can probably tell I'm pretty new to Wikipedia so I based the above articles on those for "Beto Pérez" and "Zumba" as they were the closest in content to what I wanted to write. I am not affiliated with, or paid by anyone or any company, that have wikpedia articles I have edited. I have now stated this on my user page. Do you think this will influence the decision to delete by ‪Jimfbleak‬? Thanks in advance. Pcogle 15:56, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Pcogle No because they were both blatant promo. Can you please explain how you became the copyright holder of these images? Praxidicae (talk) 15:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I was not meaning to write promotion, just state the facts as I know them, in the exact same manner as the Zumba page. I am the copyright holder of the photographs at these locations because I took the photographs with my own camera. I was at the events referenced in the meta-data. Pcogle 16:17, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Pcogle Given you took a personal photo, I assume you have some sort of conflict of interest and would encourage you to read said policy and disclose as required. Praxidicae (talk) 16:44, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps

You should be an admin? Unless I am mistaken and you are already? I think you would be great at it.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I am not and don't really have the desire to be an admin here. But thank you for your kind words. :) Praxidicae (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

ThatMontrealIP I legit thought he/she was already an Admin before discovering they weren’t. I don’t think I’ve seen anyone work round the clock like they do, this isn’t an hyperbolic statement. They literally work round the clock. No lie. Celestina007 (talk) 23:32, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

You are on a roll, against churnalism. Here is something to charge you. DBigXrayᗙ 19:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

DBigXray heh thanks. This is actually part of a much larger problem that I found today relating to several sources which are very widely used, so AFD is about to get flooded and I suspect several dozen UPE accounts are going to be found. Praxidicae (talk) 19:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Praxidicae, yes, WP:UPE is a perennial problem. Glad to know that you are doing your bit to fix the problem. However based on what I have seen, I will advise not to take more than a few (e.g. 5) articles from a particular editor in a day. IMHO the community does not appreciate overwhelming the creators with AfD. So may be, you can mark it in your Sandbox and nominate the remaining later. Just some friendly advice. regards.--DBigXrayᗙ 19:57, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm not worried, it's not just this editor that I was referring to, it just happened that two of their articles appeared on my Watchlist while doing some work finding the rest. Praxidicae (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Answer

Hi, I just answered the message you left on my Talk page. Thanks. ERIKnoUniverso (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I wrote an article on Lumen (app) and I thought I remained completely neutral when adding the content. However, you flagged it for being somehow promoting advertisements. Can you please tell me exactly where I gave the impression of being biased and one sided. Thanks Jamalpasha1992 (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

The consequences of the Jeff Young (DJ) AfD for radio articles

I have read your rationale for the deletion of the Jeff Young (DJ) article in relation to "independent, reliable coverage". The problem is, your rationale as to what meets general notability guidelines which you successfully used to delete the Jeff Young article would also sink a lot of radio related articles, including for more famous disc jockeys and individuals within the radio industry, radio stations and radio industry articles and particularly in the UK. A lot of UK radio articles use either the BBC (radio broadcaster) or Radio Today (industry media outlet) as a source which you clearly and confidently stated failed GNG for Jeff Young's now deleted article.

Technically, Chris Evans, a far more famous DJ and presenter, would fail your rationale as the vast majority of citations on his article are for a former employer (the BBC) and therefore could be fair game for AfD. But I suspect Chris Evans article going to AfD would draw attention from outside of Wikipedia.

Your call, but you would have a field day with radio articles (particularly UK ones) on Wikipedia. --tgheretford (talk) 21:19, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

I honestly can’t tell if you’re encouraging me to afd more articles to be deleted or not. Praxidicae (talk) 23:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Usually when people play WP:OSE deletion chicken with me, I just go for it. Sounds like encouragement to me! Bkissin (talk) 00:17, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

it also sounds like a threat with the “drawing attention outside of Wikipedia” comment but I really can’t tell. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Praxidicae (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, sounds like a threat. I don't think Chris Evans (who I didn't realize was a different Chris Evans) would pass an AfD anyway, seeing as he is a presenter on Top Gear. Shows how much I've paid attention to Top Gear since they fired Clarkson. Bkissin (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

yeah but I might get “outside attention”! :,) #veryscary Praxidicae (talk) 01:31, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Chris Evans (presenter) is a terrible example, as there is literally craptons of secondary coverage about him out there - his article would not be deleted at AfD, despite what Tghe-retford says. Notability is about what coverage is available (or not), not about what's in the article already when nominated. Prax's rationale of "This doesn't appear to be a notable DJ [...] the subject lacks in depth, independent coverage" specifies that there isn't SIGCOV (which the closer noted was the consensus established by policy/guideline argument). This same rationale would not apply to Chris Evans due to the substantial amount of SIGCOV available for him. Waggie (talk) 01:37, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm being serious. As for the "craptons of secondary coverage", they don't appear to be cited within the article I quoted as an example. --tgheretford (talk) 21:14, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Tghe-retford please clarify what you mean by “attracting outside attention” thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 21:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Eh, it's probably something along the lines of "I'll go to the press" and the Guardian will write an article about how Wikipedia is biased against a local BBC presenter and it will be 'very embarrassing for us. Bkissin (talk) 21:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

As far as AfD is concerned, it's not about whether it's cited in the article, it's about whether it exists. Obviously, it should be in the article (as appropriate for a quality article), but is not required for the purposes of determining notability in an AfD discussion - this is why WP:BEFORE is required before nominating an article. Others have commented that Evans' work on Top Gear and other places may confer notability, but it's the real secondary coverage to support that can be summarized into content for an article, that matters per WP:GNG and WP:ENT. The only time we should be deleting an article for a notable subject at AfD is when the article itself is un-salvageable and would require a complete rewrite. Waggie (talk) 21:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

But this is getting off track with the whole "attracting outside attention" bit, which may border on WP:THREAT. Tghe-retford, I apologize for the snark on my end, but having found a copy of the deleted article on a Wiki mirror site, I have to agree with Prax's call here (maybe not the speedy, perhaps move to draftspace, but hindsight is 20/20). The sources from Camp Soul Fest and Summer Soulstice would not really be considered Wikipedia:Reliable sources, JazzFM has the conflict of interest or would be promotional since he works there, and sources from the Beeb and the Independent mention his name once (not exactly Wikipedia:Significant coverage). With your Chris Evans example, he has had several significant profiles in the media, and some of his behaviour has led to notability outside presenting. It seems like you are doing great work, and you should keep it up, but this one still needed some work. Bkissin (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

three more to track

themagazineplus.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com allnewsstories.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com dailymusicroll.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

all have same target IP address and all seem to cross over with the other source spamfarm. Yet all from three different countries. Hmm <thinking person emoji> — billinghurst sDrewth 11:30, 20 January 2020 (UTC) Hello, I wrote an article on Lumen (app) and I thought I remained completely neutral when adding the content. However, you flagged it for being somehow promoting advertisements. Can you please tell me exactly where I gave the impression of being biased and one sided. Thanks

Article Fred Opert

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Fred_Opert

I am intrigued to learn how you could come to an assumption that I am being paid to set up a Wiki page on Fred Opert. I assure you I am not.

Perhaps a brief background will help. In the seventies I was a freelance motorsport journalist in New Zealand where I briefly met Opert when he bought his team to compete and twice win the Peter Stuyvestant series with future world champion Keke Rosberg.

I have written a book about Opert which has yet to be published.

In the 1960s and ‘70s Opert was a notable motorsport personality, he had a significant impact on formula racing in the USA and Canada before going on to enter his team in Formula Two in Europe and finally managing a Formula 1 team, ATS.

I believe that people interested in motorsport will get benefit from a Wikipedia page about the man. Peter.R.Hill (talk) 01:43, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

well primarily because when you look at worldcat the first thing that comes up is a book by someone named Pete Hill that is yet to be released. Hope that clarified things, Peter.R.Hill. Praxidicae (talk) 02:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

I have always made it clear that I have written a book about Opert, I raised that in my very first interaction with a Wiki helper and told you, above. No one is paying me to create a page about him. I have not in any way promoted the (yet to be published) book. Just to be clear, I haven’t been paid for the book either. The page can stand on its own merits as providing information about a notable motorsport personality. Peter.R.Hill (talk) 04:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

I am waiting for your reply.

So, you made a hell in the Asuka Sato's article, putting opinion, impressions and bias to judge what is or not relevant/reliable and you were very speedy to do so. I wrote you a reply and I'm waiting for yours. I would appreciate your speed in this matter too, as you seem to be replying others. ERIKnoUniverso (talk) 04:20, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

ERIKnoUniverso, first off, try to be polite & & Nahh! praxidicae is not mandated to reply you if they don’t want to.Celestina007 (talk) 23:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Delta 89

"But I guess congrats to the kids who are gonna get their college tuition paid for!" Thank you for the chuckle. :D sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 05:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

another section someone didn't bother to make

Hello Praxidicae. You norminated DJ WilSAF for deletion why. He is notable and meets the Notability criteria WikiShr3dda (talk) 23:06, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

WikiShr3dda you can clearly read the whys with an extended reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ WilSAF. Praxidicae (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Praxidicae In the sources currently at footnote #1 and #4 you can see that these are two reliable news sources from Sierra Leone which clearly shows that he is notable here WikiShr3dda (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @WikiSh3dda: The correct venue to discuss this is the AFD Praxidicae linked above. -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 13:23, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

What is the reason behind decline

Please point out so that I can fix: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Knowledge_Lens — Preceding unsigned comment added by Storiesbyjerry (talk • contribs) 05:01, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chris Duffey

Hi Praxidicae,

Can you look into the above MfD and, specifically, the most recent reply/!vote by the IP editor who notes the nom's potential COI/paid editing? I noted you've provided at least two Twinkle warnings to the editor, along with another IP editor doing the same, and in your most recent edit, you advised the editor to not edit further until the editor responds to that warning and provides appropriate clarification.

Cheers,
--Doug Mehus T·C 23:25, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

London Royal Ravens

Could I get some clarification on your input regarding sources on the article? Are sources directly from the verified twitter account associated with the team not correct as sources of signed players/staff? As the new league has just started over the weekend and the Royal Ravens Homestand event is in 2 weeks I was hoping to be able to get the article ready before then.

Thanks in advance Brandon Downes (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Please see WP:N. Having an event in two weeks is not a sufficient reason for inclusion in an encyclopedia. It lacks entirely in independent coverage, Brandon Downes and same for the rest that you've created. Praxidicae (talk) 18:24, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

A $300 million dollar international league in one of the most popular games series in history isn't notable? The league is created and run by the same people who created and run the Overwatch League so why is this deemed notable but the Call of Duty League and corresponding teams are not? Brandon Downes (talk) 18:35, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Being affiliated with notable subjects doesn't mean they are notable. You need to provide sources - for each team - that establish their notability and they must be independent, reliable and significant coverage, not announcements or passing mentions. Praxidicae (talk) 18:36, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Susan Steinberg

I didn't create the page, but I would like personal information -- such as date of birth -- not to be included. Thanks a lot.

You may not have created it but you still may not edit it directly. The birth date is sourced. Praxidicae (talk) 01:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Can the information be removed?

It is sourced, to a reliable source no less, so there isn't much reason to remove it. Praxidicae (talk) 01:36, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Does one not have the right to remove personal information about oneself?

--Susansteinberg (talk) 01:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Articles are not owned by their subject. Please read the messages on your talk page that give you instruction on how to go about requesting changes. Praxidicae (talk) 01:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

I'm not claiming ownership, just hoping that bit of personal information -- for many -- reasons -- can be removed. Thanks a lot.

--Susansteinberg (talk) 02:21, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your email

I prefer communications be open, above board, and available for scrutiny. I allowed the editor in question to edit, hopefully constructively, but left the partial block of the article in question in place. Is the editor in question betraying my AGF as well as my trust?-- Deepfriedokra 02:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

It appears to me the user is doing as they should-- discussing. Is there something in their current behavior that is problematic?-- Deepfriedokra 02:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

jAlbum article

You have recently made some reversions in the "JAlbum -" article, mistakenly thinking that I have a financial stake in jAlbum, which I don't.

The result of these reversions is that the page does not now reflect reality but contains numerous errors which I had corrected.

Can I respectfully ask that you re-read Wikipedia's "Reverting guidelines", as I don't think you have followed these.

Among other problems, in five instances, you have reverted the correct spelling of "jAlbum" to the incorrect spelling of "Jalbum".

You have removed the description of the current license model and reverted to two obsolete license models. (jAlbum is NOT now "shareware"

You have reverted to the statement "Jalbum can be thought of as similar to Google's Picasa, or Apple's iPhoto". This is incorrect.

You have removed the source reference to "is available in 32 languages."

You have reverted to mentioning the obsolete "Flash" technology.

You have reverted to obsolete subscription offers. Jimberryau (talk) 05:03, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Please delete the deletion template quickly on an article Mahesh Pandey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohit235 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Stop threatening me and harassing me on my talk page.

Can you now stop threatening me and harassing me? The language you used on my talk page is very rude and threatening. I moved the page because it was requested by the user. I was just trying to help. Hemant Dabral^Talk 20:58, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Considering several people have attempted to discuss actions you've made with you only to be ignored, I'd say it's neither of those things. Stop moving pages when you haven't a clue what you're doing and please learn to communicate and collaborate with other editors. Thanks. Praxidicae (talk) 20:59, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

First off, stop being arrogant before you warrant other users to reply you. If you have any issues with my edits, discuss it on that article's talk page. I'm not mandated to reply you in person each and every time you post anything on my talk page. When I purge my talk page it implies my intent to end the further discussions on my talk page and I do reserve the right to not talk further if I don't want to.

Regarding my edit you made an issue of, it was done in a good faith. I was just trying to to help the user by moving the page on his request. I didn't know that was a spam article because at that time it was not notified as such on that draft page. But from now on I'll just turn a blind eye on the page requests I see on technical page move list. Since helping others may land me in trouble. Thank You and Good Day! Hemant Dabral^Talk 21:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

That isn't even the primary issue and you would know this if you bothered to actually read what other editors have said to you and perhaps put some thought into a response. Praxidicae (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

I don't reply on my talk page because it leads to unnecessary arguements and quarrels. I just go silent because I don't want to engage in edit wars. It's just waste of time and energy. I reply on article's talk page though. My main issue with you is your attitude which is very bullying and threatening in nature. You were not polite when you approached me and you assumed bad faith on me by default, even though it's the first time you're talking to me. I read what people post on my talk page and I get their message. As I said, I won't move the pages up for technical requests in future even if they begged me. Be assured. Hemant Dabral^Talk 21:32, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

I did not assume bad faith. I merely pointed out, several times, that there are issues with your edits which you refuse to discuss. Praxidicae (talk) 21:34, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

There are many reasons that discourage me from posting replies and discussions. If you have time to read I'd like to post the issues I've faced in replying the messages to people.

1. First comes the Wikipedia Policy that says this site is not meant to be used for social networking and chatting with other users, thus limiting the scope of open, detailed and free discussions.

2. I'm not sure how and at what point the nature of purely editing issues may turn into personal arguements and combats between two users. There is a good chance if the person whom you are replying to might turn you in to the administrators for the perceived "spamming" and "trolling" on their talk page, in case they didn't like your replies. This behaviour is very discouraging for the constructive discussions.

To avoid these caveats and altercations, it's best to talk on an article's talk page instead of a user's talk page. Hemant Dabral^Talk 22:28, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

New and Confused Member

Hello! I wrote a draft more than 3 months ago. I just saw that you moved this draft from the sandbox to someplace else.

I therefore thought you would be able to help me with this question as well. How can I get this article published faster? I read somewhere to contact someone from the related WikiProject page, but no one there seems to know about Turkish Art so I don't really know who to contact. Please help! :)) Kilicsultan (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Kilicsultan! So, when people mark their sandbox as ready to be reviewed, reviewers are told to move those sandboxes into the draft space. That's why your draft got moved. There is a massive backlog among drafts waiting to be accepted. I would ask for help over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Turkey if you haven't already, and I'll take a look as well. Bkissin (talk) 13:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

I need some help...

I see you can help fix articles, I need some help to clean up a particularly spammy and promotional article, the link for it is here, I hope you can help me with the clean up, and also help cool down the mild edit warring, and tensions on it's talk page. I hope you can help, because looking at your edit history you seem good at this sort of thing. 96.230.240.122 (talk) 01:17, 31 January 2020 (UTC)