Jump to content

Talk:List of Indian states and union territories by GDP: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 149: Line 149:


:Any reason why you don't [[WP:SOFIXIT|do it yourself]]? I don't have as much time as I used to have, and this is a lot of work. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 19:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
:Any reason why you don't [[WP:SOFIXIT|do it yourself]]? I don't have as much time as I used to have, and this is a lot of work. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 19:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
::{{ping|Huon}} I reverted several times but IP are constantly putting unofficial data.--[[Special:Contributions/103.218.236.58|103.218.236.58]] ([[User talk:103.218.236.58|talk]]) 06:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)


== GSDP per capita? ==
== GSDP per capita? ==

Revision as of 06:29, 10 May 2020

Contradict

The table figures does not match with the reference figures, either the table is old or the intial post was messed up

The data and the table are not matching e.g west bengal SDP by 2004-2005 is 206881 units which is more than 202575 units by andhra though the list puts andhra ahead of wb. Jeroje 17:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)jeroje[reply]

Skvikram (talk) 10:45, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
For West Bengal for 2004-2005 the SDP is 208578
for Andhra Pradesh for 2004-2005 the SDP is 210449
So Andhra Pradesh is ahead of West Bengal.

Andhra Pradesh achieved annual economic growth rate of 10.37 percent against the national growth rate of 8.7 percent for fiscal 2007-08.("Bengali rasgulla ki jali",2008,IANS)

Flyfiddlesticks (talk) 16:39, 13 December 2009 (UTC) The data in this list on cities, conflicts with the data given here: List_of_cities_by_GDP[reply]

andhra was never ahead of west bengal the rank was maharastra tops with uttar pradesh 2nd and west bengal third and these figures are of 2006 validations not 2004 ..andhra pradesh never got such growth its gone with telangana violence all industries pulling out of andhra pradesh and the state is sinking to a dark future —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.194.37.210 (talk) 10:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be some more contradiction in the data present itself. On comparing the first two tables, it seems that the GDP of Mumbai is greater than that of Maharashtra. According to what is mentioned the first table presents the "Nominal GDP". However, it is not clear which GDP data is presented in second table. Assuming, the first table is really presenting the 'Nominal GDP', the GDP of Mumbai from second table cannot be larger than that of Maharashtra, irrespective of which GDP it is (since the Nominal GDP will always be the higher due to significant inflation rate in India). The different year for which data is provided also cannot be the reason to justify the figures as Indian economy is growing so the GDP of Mumbai cannot decrease. 05:52, 11 December 2011 (UTC)akhilgoyal19 on 11 Nov, 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akhilgoyal19 (talk • contribs)

I don't like the comparable country column

Unless the country is similar in both population and GDP per capita these comparisons are potentially misleading. There aren't enough suitable countries to match up all the states in that manner, and the column hasn't been completed anyway. Any objections to removal? Greg Grahame (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The comparison column is misleading and undue. It should be removed.--Sodabottle (talk) 03:18, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's also inaccurate. Kerala has a higher than average GDP per capita, and is listed as having a comparable economy to Cote d'Ivoire. However, the Indian PPP per capita is twice Cot d'Ivoire's. The entire list just seems to be nothing but a spiteful swipe at the Indian economy by westerners frightened at the thought of losing their position of dominance.98.95.220.146 (talk) 01:39, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1] is an entire article comparable to [2] and others by per capita and/or nominal (currency exchange rates) GDP. I am going to undo the merge since there is no interest here in having that data. --JWB (talk) 21:05, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I wish there was a way to +1 this, newbie here. Someone pointed to this comparable country table in a very heated discussion and it simply doesn't make sense. Analysts are using wikipedia and assuming it to be a trustworthy source, please help me remove this section. Armybrat (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

wanna Help

would Anybody please show GDP figures in INR (Indian rupee), I want to translate List of Indian states by GDP into Chinese, but I thank it should also list GDP figures in indian currency INR and USD. Cncs(Talk) 9:16 Apr. 25 2011 (UTC)

Data update: Here is a source for the latest information released by Indian Govt. The PDF can be found here. http://pib.nic.in/archieve/others/2013/dec/d2013121703.pdf . Can somebody update this data? That would be awesome. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tushonline (talk • contribs) 06:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Data

GDP of 3 cities in MAHARASHTRA (Mumbai , Pune & Nagpur), exceeds GDP of MAHARASHTRA in 2008 !!!!! Nasik, Aurangaabaad, Kolhapur are far better cities than Patna, Kanpur in terms of Industry. So they have ZERO GDP as per this data. !!!!! shit man. There seems to be error in the 2010 state gdp per capita data.I find it hard to believe that Gujarat per capita gdp is below national average and punjab's gdp per capita is below andhra pradesh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.176.226 (talk) 03:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Data

The data in this is inaccurate. There is no chance that Gujarat's GDP and per capita GDP is lower then that of West Bengal. The economist has provided more believable data http://www.economist.com/content/indian-summary — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.71.39.218 (talk) 10:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should also provide purchasing power parity

Crores of Rupees

Someon should explain what Crores of Rupees means - not all readers of this side are Indians. 193.174.142.101 (talk) 12:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, digit separation should be uniform some of the numbers are written as MMM,TTT,HHH while some are in the form of CC,LL,TT,HHH - Lord Bharath Bhushan Lohray (talk) 12:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TN GDP is not given for FY17-18.It has 2nd largest GDP than UP.please check and correct the list Bala krishna kumar s (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bad editing

Someone is swiping states for unknown and without providing a proper reason. Please don't make any bad changes. Also must refer [3] for detail. Thank you. --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 15:26, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Growth in GDP per capita table messed up?

Looks like at some point of time data went missing in "Growth in GDP per capita" section. It seems to be fine in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Indian_states_by_GDP&oldid=596000320 Although I cannot comment if it is correct as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ch4nd4n (talk • contribs) 20:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

I'm trying to fill in the 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15 tables in the Nominal GSDP from 2011–02 to 2020–21 section, but data for GSDP in current prices for the states of West Bengal, Manipur, Sikkim, and Tripura is unavailable in the main source, here. On the other hand, there is a second source from the NITI Aayog government website, here, that has figures for West Bengal, but this is not GSDP in current prices, but GSDP measured from a 2004-5 currency baseline. There's nothing for Manipur, Sikkim, and Tripura either. Where can I source accurate GSDP stats in current figures for these states from? Tiger7253 (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please link the term "nominal" in the lead of this article to the Nominal GDP. Thanks. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 07:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2017

Tamil Nadu's GDP for 2017-2018 is $235 billion, as per https://openbudgetsindia.org/organization/tamil-nadu-budget-2017-18 Indianguy49859 (talk) 04:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Indianguy49859:  In progress The link you provided goes to a list of documents. I looked through several but I couldn't find the number 235 billion. Would you point me to the page that verifies this new amount? CityOfSilver 13:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Requester has not identified the particular source for over a week at this point, no need to leave open unless they provide a reliable source Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Indian states and union territories by GDP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2018

Update/Modify the data for the GDP of state of WEST BENGAL 2017-18 estimate in the GSDP (nominal) chart. REASON: In the GSDP (nominal) chart, the data for GDP of state of WEST BENGAL 2017-18 estimate (ranked 6th) has been referenced at citation [9] which is not external document, rather another article in Wikipedia --> "Economy of West Bengal". This article (Economy of west bengal) again in its citation [25],[26] include 2 documents which mentions data till 2014-15, NOT 2017-18. Therefore the source of this data (GDP of West Bengal 2017-18 estimate) is ambiguous and should be modified. Anirbanonline92 (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Sakura CarteletTalk 00:43, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong data in nominal growth rate

The State of Telangana was formed in 2014. But the growth rate of Telangana is stated from the year 2010 to 2014. Which is not at all practically possible. 

Udayuk15 (talk) 16:04, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Forecast data

For many states the data is not real GSDP data but forecasted future data. That, obviously, is inherently error-prone because any such forecast relies on assumptions about future events (or a lack thereof). There could be natural catastrophes such as earthquakes, floods and so on that affect GSDP for one state or another. There could be man-made catastrophes, ranging from a stock market crash and global economic crisis to war. There could, conversely, be an unforeseen economic boom ahead. We don't know. We cannot know. These forecasts might also be subject to political bias: If a state government wants to engage in massive new spending, they might be tempted to produce a more rosy economic forecast to show that financing the new expeditures will not be a problem. Or they might overestimate the positive effects of their own policies. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. We should not ignore the inherent uncertainties of the forecast data and should report the GDP that has been achieved, not the GDP that is hoped will be achieved in the future. I'll check the page history for a revision that doesn't have forecast data and will revert to that. Huon (talk) 10:08, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparetly presenting forecasts as if they were real has been a feature of this list for quite some time. I'd have to revert many months of edits to find a clean version. That seems unhelpful; I'll instead use the latest data presented by MOSPI. That table was last updated in March 2019, so we should be reasonably sure that these are indeed current figures (or at least the most current available). For the fun of it, I'll append a table showing some examples of how the forecasts as of December 2018 deviated from what MOSPI actually reports for the same time. Huon (talk) 10:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comparison of GSDP (nominal) 2018-19 in INR crore: Forecast vs. MOSPI
State Wikipedia MOSPI Error
Chattisgarh 325000 311660 4%
Himachal Pradesh 152000 151835 0%
Karnataka 1408000 1510250 -7%
Madhya Pradesh 826000 809327 2%
Punjab 518000 518291 0%
Tamil Nadu 1678000 1605893 4%
Telangana 843000 866875 -3%
Uttar Pradesh 1489000 1542432 -3%

@Huon: Please revert the unofficial GDP data. Its difficult to monitor these stats as different users are updating with unofficial stats. Official Source: [1] Thanks--103.218.236.58 (talk) 04:12, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Any reason why you don't do it yourself? I don't have as much time as I used to have, and this is a lot of work. Huon (talk) 19:44, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Huon: I reverted several times but IP are constantly putting unofficial data.--103.218.236.58 (talk) 06:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GSDP per capita?

Any reason not to include?--Goldsztajn (talk) 21:36, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, I see it is a separate article. Apologies.--Goldsztajn (talk) 21:37, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "MOSPI Net State Domestic Product, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India". Retrieved 7 April 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Indian_states_and_union_territories_by_GDP&oldid=955862456"