User talk:Kiran891: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:00, 26 May 2020

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

Why do you see Forum for Democracy as far right political party?

Hi, I'm from the Netherlands and Forum for Democracy isn't a far right party at all, please look at their point of view on https://forumvoordemocratie.nl/standpunten Forum for Democracy is also member of the European ECR Party that isn't far right at all. I would consider partys like the AfD, Front National and for example the Brazilian president Bolsonaro as far-right. Why do you see them as a far-right party?

Hi there anon, I don't make any judgements. I did some checking on what are you on about, and see that I made a revert on page you mentioned. It was simply removed because it was unsourced content/opinion. Content with reputable sources will typically be accepted on Wikipedia pages. Also, please sign your messages with four tildes so I know who I am talking to. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 20:47, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting text about a book Richard L. Thompson wrote

I presume you didn't read the first sentence. Please be more careful. Doug Weller talk 19:39, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Anya chalotra

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Anya chalotra. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Anya Chalotra. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Anya Chalotra. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Sophiajoanne 04:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Anya Chalotra

Hello, GreaterPonce665,

Thanks for creating Anya Chalotra! I edit here too, under the username MJL and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Just a friendly reminder that IMDb is not a reliable source

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MJL}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 06:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Frood 06:19, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:16, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raghunath Anant Mashelkar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FRS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Page

I will once again ask how providing context for Duke being a top 10 university within the US is any different than being a top 20 university worldwide. That is not puffery, POV, nor COI. Either both go or both stay, in my opinion. We can discuss this further if you would like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.3.43.45 (talk) 23:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user (ElKevbo) is repeatedly vandalizing Duke's page. I'm not experienced enough to know how to get him to stop but I recently provided four citations from Forbes, US News, The Wall Street Journal, and Niche ranking Duke in the top 10 and he deleted my contribution without any explanation despite the fact that virtually every other school has similar rankings information in the lede. Can you please report him on my behalf?

Please stop telling me to report other users, especially @ElKevbo:, dude's a professional.. Also, stop academic boosterism and cherry picking sources . Sign your comments with fours tildes(~). GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 19:01, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dr.Babasaheb Ambedkar (film) article issues.

I added a templates on sub sections of this article.beacuse these sub sections do not have references, citations. They're written like a essay. Their is no way to verify information provided in sections - Production, Cast. Most of the statement lines are unreferenced.you can watch it yourself. Kundan Ravindra Dhayade (talk) 14:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kundan Ravindra Dhayade, Thanks for letting me know. There are hundreds of thousands of articles with little to no references, and it may not be always worthwhile to keep adding unreferced or refimprove templates. For cast section, typically citations are not required. 10 citations for a movie are not bad, so I don't think that refimprove at the beginning is needed. I'll take a look. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help to add images in infoboxs in wiki articles.

I read you edit articles related to India and your experienced editor on Wikipedia. So I invite you to edit pictures in infoboxes of some articles, further mentioned- Eknath Khadse, Girish Mahajan, Muktabai. Chandrakant Nimba Patil. Tell me how can add logo in my Colleges wikipedia article. It's name is G.G. Khadse college. Kundan Ravindra Dhayade (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

take a look here Template:Infobox_university GreaterPonce665 (talk) 15:00, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would be hesitant to add picture that I don't possess copyright for. Noticing your talk page, it appears that you are uploading pictures you don't have permissions for. Please make sure you follow wikipedia's copyright policies. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 15:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Palais Royale Mumbai

Kindly refrain from editing above mentioned page

May I know why? GreaterPonce665 (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi GreaterPonce665. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! bibliomaniac 1 5 02:22, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SHC014-COV

I had written that I had sourced my rationale for deletion of sections of the article on SHC014-COV. It looks like you saw those and reverted the article back to my edits. I appreciate it. The article was previously in clear violation of WP:Original Research. The news articles from RT, FoxNews and The Guardian never mentioned SHC014-COV, or that it could be the parental virus. And one of their sources explicitly discounts the possibility (ironically enough). Articles about coronaviruses need to be watched carefully, as people adding blurbs like the deleted one is becoming commonplace. ComradeScientist (talk) 03:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:ComradeScientist, thanks for being a thorough editor. I have background in chemistry but its materials chemistry, so I can't fairly judge the claims in posted articles. I appreciate you taking time to explain your edits. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 03:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GreaterPonce665

Hi GreaterPonce665, there are literally no citations on the sections I removed on Cihanbeyli page.Ashurpedia (talk) 23:25, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ashurpedia, it would be preferable to add a source or may be remove ethnicity info if there's no source at all. I think there's some valuable data there, and most town pages are poorly cited anyways. I would love to keep the info there, but if you feel strongly about it, I'll not revert your work. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 15:24, 30 April 2020 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 17:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sock edits

With regards to your problematic revert, see WP:BMB, which says that all edits of a blocked sock can be removed for the reason alone that it was made by a sockpuppet. Fact that you restored the problematic section shunned by WP:NOCRIT would make you responsible for any of the content that was being added there. "He was criticised for spreading fake news" is not even supported by the source. What criticism? Be careful with editing in these subjects given you have been notified of sanctions already above which are active in this area. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 13:11, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aman.kumar.goel, I agree with your revert here; wasn't aware for WP:BMB policy. I still believe the content belongs there, albeit with a more neutral tone. About the notice part, hundreds of editors have it - you also have it on your talk page - so no need to insinuate anything here. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 13:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was only reminding because many editors ignore the sanctions. I don't see why the content should be added. Sure he made a comment which created a kind of reception but it does not represent his career or significantly affects his image. If every comment of these people have been analyzed on Wikipedia then the page would become too big in no time, contrary to WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 13:49, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to the article is much better than what I was expecting. Thanks for it. Aman Kumar Goel ^(Talk) 13:55, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sorry, I was getting leery without cause. GreaterPonce665 (talk) 14:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages

Please review WP:BLANKING. The only things users may not remove from their talk pages are declined unblock requests (while the block is active), and a few things related to MFD and shared IPs. Users are free to remove block notices, warnings, and pretty much anything else. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:39, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jpgordon, thanks for letting me know. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 19:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Duke

Please familiarize yourself with other university pages. Forbes, US News, and the Wall Street Journal produce the most credible and widely read rankings in the US. There is nothing "cherry picked" about these sources. The line about Duke being a top 10 school deserves to be featured prominently in the lede. Particularly when other schools of similar caliber have all this fluff about being among "the most prestigious universities in the world" in their ledes. If you have a problem with it being in the lede, open it up to the community for resolution. Please don't edit the article without the input of others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.237.226 (talk) 22:43, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

Hi GreaterPonce665, could you please tell me why you made this revert as vandalism? [1]. It doesn't look that way to me; if it was a mistake could you put it back and remove the IP's talk page warning? Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 01:34, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @IamNotU:, I do not believe it was a mistake, that edit looked as if it were a plot for a movie or a fiction. While it was not necessary a case of vandalism, I was using Huggle and probably didn't select correct user message. Please see Template:Tone. Would you like me to change the message to something else? Thanks. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 02:12, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry but I still don't understand. The edits look to me like a simple copy edit. They've fixed grammar, punctuation, wording, etc. No significant material was added or removed. There are maybe a couple of mistakes and some changes in wording that are a bit pointless, but overall it looks like an improvement. The IP has been copy-editing a lot of articles, again with some small problems and typos, but generally looks constructive and helpful. Maybe you could take another look? --IamNotU (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I still do not think that edit was a simple copy edit; there's no improvement in the article, mostly pointless edit. I feel that you are interested in editor retention here, so sure, I'll remove my message on ip talk page. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 13:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing the vandalism warning. I'm still not sure exactly what's wrong with the edits though, and I'd like to know if there is a problem in general with this user's edits that should be looked at more carefully. I did have to fix some careless mistakes they made in a couple of other articles. If you have the time, could you explain what you mean by "looked as if it were a plot for a movie or a fiction", and why you think it was something other than copy editing? Thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 14:28, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashi Hi Banwa Banwi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shailendra Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Dr. Brown deletion

You are the expert, but you may want to consider that my addition to the Wikipedia bio that cited Dr. Brown's quote did cite my book "In the President's Secret Service." The Washington Post obit which the Wikipedia bio cites as a source considered the quote significant enough to include it, so an outside source--namely the Washington Post--did consider it important. In addition, since you asked why the quote is relevant, the Washington Post obit said, "In Washington, Dr. Brown became an authority on political psychiatry, focusing on individual leadership qualities, group dynamics, political strategy and tactics to achieve policy goals, especially when it came to the occupier of the White House." But I respectfully bow to your expertise and hope this additional info may be helpful! KesslerRonald (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Ronald Kessler — Preceding unsigned comment added by KesslerRonald (talk • contribs)

@KesslerRonald:Mr. Kessler , Thanks for the message. I appreciate you taking the time. I think the other sentence mentioned here - "In Washington, Dr. Brown became an authority on political psychiatry, focusing on individual leadership qualities, group dynamics, political strategy and tactics to achieve policy goals, especially when it came to the occupier of the White House." - is much better suited for addition to the article. Previously I was not sure it alone was worthy enough quote to be included in a start-class article (per WP:DUE). Personal perspective quote is definitely a plus, and with this new WaPo quote, I'm not opposed to its addition anymore. Thanks. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 18:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One additional minor thing is about signing your messages with 4 tildes like this ~~~~ , so others know who they are talking to.GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 18:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to put wikipedia page on permanent protection.

Hi, We have been seeing an increased number of vandalism on Devendra Fadnavis Wikipedia page. The recent edit was undone by you, for which we are really grateful. The page was put on partial protection which expired on the 18th of May. During the protection period the act of vandalism ceased but as soon as the protection period was over the vandalism restarted. You may go through the edit history to merit the given accusation.

We would be obliged if the page was placed on permanent protection to ensure that these acts of vandalism cease forever and only those who have been registered, verified, and active on Wikipedia, make suitable changes to the aforementioned page.

@@ Line 149: / Line 149: @@
 : {{replyto|KesslerRonald}}Mr. Kessler , Thanks for the message. I appreciate you taking the time. I think the other sentence mentioned here - ''"In Washington, Dr. Brown became an authority on political psychiatry, focusing on individual leadership qualities, group dynamics, political strategy and tactics to achieve policy goals, especially when it came to the occupier of the White House." '' - is much better suited for addition to the article. Previously I was not sure it alone was worthy enough quote to be included in a start-class article (per [[WP:DUE]]). Personal perspective quote is definitely a plus, and with this new WaPo quote, I'm not opposed to its addition anymore.  Thanks. [[User:GreaterPonce665|<span style="color:#000E54">''GreaterPonce665''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:GreaterPonce665#top|'''TALK''']]) </sup> 18:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
 ::One additional minor thing is about signing your messages with 4 tildes like this <nowiki> ~~~~ </nowiki>, so others know who they are talking to.[[User:GreaterPonce665|<span style="color:#000E54">''GreaterPonce665''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:GreaterPonce665#top|'''TALK''']]) </sup> 18:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
+== Request to put wikipedia page on permanent protection. ==
+Hi,
+We have been seeing an increased number of vandalism on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Devendra_Fadnavis&action=history Devendra Fadnavis] Wikipedia page. The recent edit was undone by you, for which we are really grateful.
+The page was put on partial protection which expired on the 18th of May. During the protection period the act of vandalism ceased but as soon as the protection period was over the vandalism restarted. You may go through the edit history to merit the given accusation.
+We would be obliged if the page was placed on permanent protection to ensure that these acts of vandalism cease forever and only those who have been registered, verified, and active on Wikipedia, make suitable changes to the aforementioned page.