Talk:Bahrain–Israel normalization agreement: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:'''Support''': for the same reasons applicable to the UAE; it cannot be a peace agreement if there was never a state of conflict, and in fact Israel and Bahrain have had an undisclosed friendly relationship since at least Israeli prime minister [[Shimon Peres]]'s visit in the 1990s. It is factually a normalization agreement, no matter what spin is put on it. --[[User:Telecart|Telecart]] ([[User talk:Telecart|talk]]) 19:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
:'''Support''': for the same reasons applicable to the UAE; it cannot be a peace agreement if there was never a state of conflict, and in fact Israel and Bahrain have had an undisclosed friendly relationship since at least Israeli prime minister [[Shimon Peres]]'s visit in the 1990s. It is factually a normalization agreement, no matter what spin is put on it. --[[User:Telecart|Telecart]] ([[User talk:Telecart|talk]]) 19:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
:'''Support''': As others have said, it can't be a "peace agreement" if there was no prior state of conflict. Bahrain and many other Gulf states (including Saudi Arabia) already have a close back door relationship with Israel.--[[User:HadesTheEldest|HadesTheEldest]] ([[User talk:HadesTheEldest|talk]]) 20:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
:'''Support''': As others have said, it can't be a "peace agreement" if there was no prior state of conflict. Bahrain and many other Gulf states (including Saudi Arabia) already have a close back door relationship with Israel.--[[User:HadesTheEldest|HadesTheEldest]] ([[User talk:HadesTheEldest|talk]]) 20:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
||
:'''Support''': There was no state of war, declared or otherwise, to end, and so this cannot be a peace agreement. It's simply going from a state of no relation, to normal relations. Think of a new country, that starts to form relations with other nations - it might be "recognized", it might sign agreements regulating trade and diplomatic relations. But those would certainly not be peace agreements. [[User:Okedem|okedem]] ([[User talk:Okedem|talk]]) 23:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:31, 11 September 2020
Bahrain Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Requested move 11 September 2020
It has been proposed in this section that Bahrain–Israel normalization agreement be renamed and moved to Bahrain-Israel normalization agreement. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Bahrain–Israel peace agreement → Bahain-Israel normalization agreement – There isn't really many RS calling it a peace agreement (not including Trump himself), not to mention it isn't actually a peace agreement. In contrast, most RS are referring to it as the normalization of relations, not to mention that is the actual accurate title. See 1 "landmark deal to fully normalise their relations", 2 "announces deal between Bahrain, Israel to normalize relations", 3 "Bahrain has joined the United Arab Emirates in striking an agreement to normalize relations with Israel", 4 "Bahrain Will Normalize Relations With Israel", and 5 5 "Bahrain has become the latest Arab nation to agree to normalize ties with Israel" among what I am sure are many others. Changed to Bahain-Israel normalization agreement as per WP:CONCISE Zoozaz1 (talk) 18:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support: I agree with you that it is not a peace agreement or treaty because the two countries have not fought in the past.--Sakiv (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support: for the same reasons applicable to the UAE; it cannot be a peace agreement if there was never a state of conflict, and in fact Israel and Bahrain have had an undisclosed friendly relationship since at least Israeli prime minister Shimon Peres's visit in the 1990s. It is factually a normalization agreement, no matter what spin is put on it. --Telecart (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support: As others have said, it can't be a "peace agreement" if there was no prior state of conflict. Bahrain and many other Gulf states (including Saudi Arabia) already have a close back door relationship with Israel.--HadesTheEldest (talk) 20:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support: There was no state of war, declared or otherwise, to end, and so this cannot be a peace agreement. It's simply going from a state of no relation, to normal relations. Think of a new country, that starts to form relations with other nations - it might be "recognized", it might sign agreements regulating trade and diplomatic relations. But those would certainly not be peace agreements. okedem (talk) 23:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)