Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 15: Line 15:
:::::{{ping|Flalf}} A draft not making it to mainspace shows that 1) either the proper research about suitability of the topic wasn't done beforehand (which is required for NPPers to review) or 2) it's still a draft in progress in which you haven't had the time to pickup/finish, but would like to take on this responsibility. It might be a bit cynical, but that's where my thoughts came from. -- [[User talk:AmandaNP|<span style="color:white;background-color:#8A2DB8"><b>Amanda</b></span>]] <small>[[User:AmandaNP|(aka DQ)]]</small> 04:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Flalf}} A draft not making it to mainspace shows that 1) either the proper research about suitability of the topic wasn't done beforehand (which is required for NPPers to review) or 2) it's still a draft in progress in which you haven't had the time to pickup/finish, but would like to take on this responsibility. It might be a bit cynical, but that's where my thoughts came from. -- [[User talk:AmandaNP|<span style="color:white;background-color:#8A2DB8"><b>Amanda</b></span>]] <small>[[User:AmandaNP|(aka DQ)]]</small> 04:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|AmandaNP}} Guess that makes sense. Although I actually picked up the draft initially to help a newcomer and ended up doing more work than they did on it, didn't really intend for it to be mine, was meant to be some short advice. Thanks for taking time to reply! [[User:flalf|'''<em style="font-family:Lucida;color:Indigo">Flalf</em>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Flalf|'''<em style="font-family:Lucida;color:Indigo">Talk</em>''']]</sup> 06:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
::::::{{ping|AmandaNP}} Guess that makes sense. Although I actually picked up the draft initially to help a newcomer and ended up doing more work than they did on it, didn't really intend for it to be mine, was meant to be some short advice. Thanks for taking time to reply! [[User:flalf|'''<em style="font-family:Lucida;color:Indigo">Flalf</em>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Flalf|'''<em style="font-family:Lucida;color:Indigo">Talk</em>''']]</sup> 06:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
:::::::That is fair, hard to see when reviewing. -- [[User talk:DeltaQuad|<span style="color:white;background-color:#8A2DB8"><b>Amanda - mobile</b></span>]] <small>[[User:AmandaNP|(aka DQ)]]</small> 06:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


====[[User:Governor Sheng]]====
====[[User:Governor Sheng]]====

Revision as of 06:26, 2 December 2020

New page reviewer

I patrol recent changes and just passed my final CVUA assesment. I use twinkle and rollback vandalism with it as well. I think this tool would be very useful for preventing vandalism and making sure good content makes it's way to mainspace. Thanks for hearing me out! FlalfTalk 20:50, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you're trying to "mak[e] sure good content makes it's [sic] way to mainspace", that would be AfC. NPP is only for pages already in mainspace (t · c) buidhe 04:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Given you just got rollback 3 days ago, you have no AfD, AfC, or content CSD experience and a draft you proposed hasn't made itself to mainspace, I'm going to say  Not done at this time. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:09, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AmandaNP: Alrighty, thanks! Just curious though, why is a draft not going into mainspace relevant for a new page reviewer, wouldn't that be more AfC territory? FlalfTalk 02:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Flalf: A draft not making it to mainspace shows that 1) either the proper research about suitability of the topic wasn't done beforehand (which is required for NPPers to review) or 2) it's still a draft in progress in which you haven't had the time to pickup/finish, but would like to take on this responsibility. It might be a bit cynical, but that's where my thoughts came from. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@AmandaNP: Guess that makes sense. Although I actually picked up the draft initially to help a newcomer and ended up doing more work than they did on it, didn't really intend for it to be mine, was meant to be some short advice. Thanks for taking time to reply! FlalfTalk 06:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That is fair, hard to see when reviewing. -- Amanda - mobile (aka DQ) 06:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've been on Wikipedia for three years, made 4.5k+ edits, and created 37 articles. --Governor Sheng (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Governor Sheng (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any reason you are applying for NPP, AWB and autopatrolled all at the same time? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Governor Sheng: for response. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
To more quickly have new pages reviewed as they're added (sometimes by me). –Piranha249 01:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you are looking for your own articles to be set as reviewed, you'd be better looking at Autopatrolled. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 18:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done No AfC, AfD, or CSD experience to base off of. Most page creations are redirects. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:59, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting a trial period after improvement in CSD and page-moving! I like to improve the NPP because it is severely backlogged with up to three month wait times. Heart (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 On hold Would other admins hold off on actioning this for a couple days? Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 02:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Thank you for volunteering and for your enthusiasm. Unfortunately, I don't think you're currently experienced enough for this tool. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:22, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I spend a very significant portion of my on-wiki time reviewing the Recent Changes feed, and would like to be able to process those pages as I see them instead of leaving them for another patroller to review. I'd also like to assist with article space page reviews (and I already do to an extent, as my RC feed includes moves to article space). —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 15:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done at this time. Your AfD record shows you are around 50% agreeance with the community. Your CSDs only show a handful of nominations outside of G11 and U5, which are very easy targets. No AfC experience. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Over the past few weeks, I have become a relatively active recent changes patroller and frequently voluntarily patrol new pages, and have therefore gathered significant CSD experience and some AfD experience. I also am quite proficient with both using Twinkle and RedWarn. I, most recently, passed new pages patrol school, so I'd like to request new page reviewer rights. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 12:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has 462 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 12:30, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done For a month. I'm partially concerned by your low edit count, potential to WP:BITE and a few mistakes that you made very recently. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 05:29, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]