User talk:Largoplazo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:39, 13 December 2020

Hello! I find it easier to follow a conversation if it's in one place. Therefore:

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, linking to me ({{Ping|Largoplazo}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Once I've left a message on your talk page, I'll generally know if you've responded there even without the "reply to" because I will have watchlisted you. However, some automated messages, like the ones for speedy deletion, don't add the addressee to the sender's watchlist. Also, if I'm away for a few days, my watchlist may not go back far enough for me to see your reply. Hiiiiiii sooo i just Read your text about ajvar and i want to know How do you know about the name and what is the translation of the word to english

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Grupo paranga, Largoplazo.

Unfortunately Jackmcbarn has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Article has a lot of issues other than the COI, so it needs further review (and quite possibly tagging for deletion)

To reply, leave a comment on Jackmcbarn's talk page.

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Evans Sylvestre, Largoplazo.

Unfortunately Josu4u has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I think someone needs to review this, whether it meets speedy deletion or not.

To reply, leave a comment on Josu4u's talk page.

Futuristic

brooooooooooooooooooo, I took 1-2 total hours on that page instead of doing the homework.

Thank you for participating

Just wanted to say thanks. Azeriking55 (talk) 21:19, 27 July 2020

Kanafeh

Turkish Kanafeh is made with Semolina. the Arabic Kanafeh is made with "Kadaif Noodles". i don't know if it was another version of this dish, but i know this have tow main version. Thank you Garagarage1979 (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Garagarage1979: I don't know why you came here to tell me this or what you thought the outcome would be. Largoplazo (talk) 13:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to correct mistakes. that's all. Garagarage1979 (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Garagarage1979: To correct mistakes I didn't make? Largoplazo (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitongues

Hi Largoplazo! I think you should bring the linkspamm issue to community attention in WikiProject Languages. –Austronesier (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop deleting facts from Wikipedia

You are abusing Wikipedia. The edit at Namecheap was a fact and it was not advertising. You deleted it and this can be regarded as vandalism. I linked out to a blog that proclaims this fact and this website itself does not appear to be a Domain sales website like Namecheap or others. The link to the article that I am referencing is exactly the same as the link to the tomsguide article before it. There is no difference between the two.

A website selling domain names is not a reliable source for statements like "is considered to be one of the cheapest domain registrars". Given the other links to the same website you've inserted into other articles, drawing attention to that website appears to be your primary motivation. Tom's Guide, in contrast, is a neutral source of balanced reviews, so it isn't "exactly the same" in any relevant sense. Largoplazo (talk) 17:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've edited again but your IP address has changed. One of your edit summaries under the newer IP address: "The link is to a blog that proclaims this fact and this website itself does not appear to be a Domain sales website like Namecheap." (1) A blog is not a reliable source for verifying assertions. As though falsehoods are never found in blogs. (2) The website's home page makes it crystal clear that it's selling domain and associated services. (3) You claim not to know that that's the site's purpose but you're sufficiently taken with the site that you've inserted links to it in three different articles, and that's the only editing you've done here. Largoplazo (talk) 17:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page has now been protected.

In addition to what I've said before, see WP:BRD about what to do when you add content to a web page and someone reverts you with a reason. Your approach isn't the correct one. Largoplazo (talk) 17:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

89.176.54.137‎

I blocked this IP. The outburst on Talk:Czech Republic‎ was immediately after expiration of their previous block for inappropriate comments on that same talkpage. DMacks (talk) 23:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Largoplazo,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Please I am pleading for reconsideration

Dear Wikipedia great admins and super moderators,

I am writing to make an apology for violating the rules and regulations of Wikipedia.

With no pride and haughty temperament, I have admitted wholly with my humble self that I have gone against the terms and conditions of Wikipedia. I offer my profound humble apology to the whole staff of Wikipedia for what I have done.

On this day (11 December 2020) notification bumped up on my screen and I found out that my websites; xclusivepop.com and xclusivesongs.com have been flagged and blacklisted. Honestly, I have no grumbles and I have admitted this's all I deserved for I violated the rules guiding Wikipedia by creating multiple accounts and involving in spams.

Please accept my deepest apologies for my mistake in regard to multiple accounts.

It was not my intention to create such an awkward and embarrassing situation for Wikipedia. My aim is to be part of Wikipedia communities that will contribute, not to cause damages.

In a humble apology, I plead the whole staff of Wikipedia to consider giving me a second chance and remove my website from the blacklist. I promise I shall remain ever obedient consistently so to give out a genuine and genius result to the world. I will be engulfed with pleasure if my request and apology are granted.

Please feel free to let me know your thoughts and concerns over this matter.

Sincerely,

Desmond Afam. Desmond Afam130 (talk) 19:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]