Talk:First Flight (Star Trek: Enterprise)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the First Flight (Star Trek: Enterprise) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

First Flight (Star Trek: Enterprise) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 25, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 16, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during the filming of the Star Trek: Enterprise episode "First Flight", the cast and crew were presented with a flag from the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65)?

Television: Episode coverage GA‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek GA‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trivia

I merged the trivia section into the article. Lots42 (talk) 14:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:First Flight (Star Trek: Enterprise)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ed! (talk · contribs) 11:55, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It occurs to me that the concept of "warp" isn't well understood outside of Star Trek. I know there's a link to a warp article, but I tend to think making people click elsewhere for something that integral to the plot might distract them. Do you think a line or two about warp here would be helpful?

Added an additional paragraph to production, which included a quick line about the Vulcans too. Miyagawa (talk) 23:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly, "dark matter" might need some explaining.

I've added a line about dark matter, although the key quote from the NASA page is that scientists know more about what dark matter isn't than what it actually is. (And I know even less!) Miyagawa (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Graph 2 of the plot takes place in the past, but it isn't clear from the wording, so some clarity might help.

Added a "flashback" note. Miyagawa (talk) 23:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The Vulcans attempt to use this to argue that ... " here, it might help to clarify what role the Vulcans have in the series here (the average person who hasn't seen early ENT episodes might not understand)
Any information about how long shooting lasted or when it ended?

Added. Miyagawa (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You should link the ranks of the real-life Navy people.

Done. Miyagawa (talk) 22:58, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two images appear to be properly licensed. I see no apparent problems with article stability or neutrality.
No dup links or dab links. External links all appear to check out.

Placing the article on hold to await responses. —Ed!^(talk) 12:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great work! Passing the GA. —Ed!^(talk) 02:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on First Flight (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on First Flight (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061110081339/http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=3408 to http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=3408

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]