User talk:Natl1/Archive 1

Welcome To My Talk Page

Click Here To Leave me A Message.

Archive 1
Archive 2

This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at Wikipedia:Editor review/Natl1.

Welcome

Hello, Natl1/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Geniac 13:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aloha Shoyu Company

I think you should not have created this article, which is basically an advert. See WP:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer particularly "review your intentions" for guidelines. It's obvious that the article was submitted for promotional purposes, and as such, it should have been rejected. I've nominated it for speedy but if that doesn't fly, then I'll see about putting a deletion request through the afc submission process. That ought to be interesting. The submitter has also been spamming extlinks all over wikipedia and I've cleaned some of them up and left him or her a note. 67.117.130.181 11:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tags

When nominating articles for speedy deletion please be sure to give a reason why the article is a candidate. Here are the criteria for speedy deletion. The corresponding templates are at the bottom of the page.--Joe Jklin (T C) 21:38, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Bihar Regiment

I see that you tagged the page I created for speedy deletion. Before you add any tag for speedy deletion, wait for a little while, I had created the page 2 minutes before your tag and was in the process of adding more information. I have gone ahead and removed the tag, because it is irrelevant. If you have any questions or concerns, leave me a message on my talk page.

I see that you have done this quite a few times before. Give the users time to add information especially if it is a new page. Otherwise, I will have to bring this to the attention of the admins.

Mail Order Ninja

Hey Natl1. I just wanted to let you know that I thought that Mail Order Ninja was quite notable because it won the Rising Stars of Manga contest. Also, when I went on to see the rules about Notability, I noticed that many people were debating whether it should even be a rule or not. I don't think that we should use that rule until Wikipedia as a whole has a majority of people who think it's a good rule. For these reasons, I just redid the page. Please don't delete the page unless you can give a good reason for its deletion. Thank you! ( By the way, it's funny that you deleted the page so quickly. I swear it took thrity seconds. Oh well.)

Deletion?

I'm sorry, but I didn't delete an article called "Golden Highway" (this page has apparently never been deleted?)Borisblue 02:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rusty Kane

I am requesting to see deleted article Rusty Kane because it has been submitted at AfC and I want to compare the deleted version to the submitted version. Please leave a message at User talk:Natl1. --Natl1 23:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can see the text at User:Natl1/Rusty Kane. I will delete the temporary page tomorrow (Sunday 17th December) at 2000 GMT, unless you have a specific objection. (aeropagitica) 00:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks!

Thank you so much, Natl1, for your gracious support in my RfA (48/1/0)! I am very happy that you trust me with this great honor and privilege. If at any time you think that I need to step back and take a deep breath or just want to talk, please contact me. Happy editing! Cbrown1023 03:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Google earth edit

Just checking as to what was not suitable about my comment about the wikipedia links on google earth. this is my first time putting any content in wiki...-- User talk:159.124.100.13

I reverted your edit to Google Earth because Wikipedia is not a place to publish your own thoughts and analyses. See WP:NOT#OR. Even thought Wikipedia may link to Google Earth inaccuratly, it is obvious that you researched this yourself and that it was not reserched by any other reference. --Natl1 21:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About your article

Much was rewritten. Please look it over again.--ArtBaroness 07:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

It reads like an ad. Please rewrite it, or it will be deleted. FirefoxMan 22:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Football AID 24 - 31 December

Thank you for participating in the Football AID vote this week.

Italy national football team has been selected as this week's collaboration. Please do help in working to improve it.

NPWatcher welcome

You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give me any feature requests or bugs. I'm also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if I've made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Finally, enjoy! M a rtinp23 14:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Coca-Cola

Your recent edit to Coca-Cola (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 21:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coca-Cola

Mark Pendergrast (2000). For God, Country and Coca-Cola. Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-05468-4. Johnleemk | Talk 11:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Natl1! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego ^talk 16:53, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Devil sticks

The three paragraphs that I removed were clearly the work of vandals. Please refrain from reverting unless you've verified that the removal of text is, in fact, vandalism. SoCalAlum 20:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nellore district

Yes, I am not experimenting and actually adding information. I believe my changes should not have been reverted. I am adding geography and also providing references. The development section is actually below further down. That unknown user has copied it again, and so I deleted it. Agree? Mlpkr 20:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Supercharger

Why did you revert my deletion of a section? There is a discussion page entry in which I justified my action, and it seems that you did not even read it judging by the speed with which you reverted it. And if you did, please provide your reasoning.

As requested, here's my entry in the talk page, along with someone else's from months ago, which no one has rebutted since.

Supercharging has little meaning when applied to jet engines. The compressor has more to do with compression rather than overfilling the chambers. Although the parts are similar the application is totally different and I don't see how it can be called supercharging in the same sense because the engine wont run at all without a compressor. I think the section should be removed or qualified.--=Motorhead 03:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Agreed, the concept of supercharging in the context of jet engines is 100% redundant and nonsensical. I'm deleting the section. The "super" in supercharging means "above" something, and that "something" is the ambient air density that a naturally aspirated piston engine is supplied with from the atmosphere. Of course there are no naturally aspirated jet engines, as the compressor is an integral part of their basic function. Vessbot 20:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

In the future, please look at the background debate behind an issue before jumping the trigger. You could have easily found it with a search for my username in the talkpage.

VP - slight concern

Hi! Thanks for helping us clean up vandalism with WP:VPRF! I noticed that you aren't on the Recently Approved list and you aren't in the IRC channel for VP2. How are you making these edits? Have you just been approved for longer than the recent list shows, or are you not really using VP? Remember that running unauthorized bots in against policy and may result in a block. Thanks for helping out with the vandalism! ST47Talk 13:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, looks like you fell off the list :( I noticed that you were reverting some edits by Jmax, removing too many links on an article. Just looking at the diffs can be misleading, the edit summary is rather important, and if you revert someone on a not-sure case, and they do it again, I like getting a sec0ond opinion on the edit. Thanks, and good luck! ST47Talk 13:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Money laundering

this was intentional, please revert your revert. I'm honestly a little worried that perhaps your forceful use of VP is scaring off the new users. Please be more kind in the future, and don't forget to assume good faith! -- Jmax- 13:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry -- I was under the impression that your edit was a mistake; apologies. I will go through and check each link to assure they are not useful or government agencies, and will remove the appropriate ones -- Jmax- 14:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF re User:Jmax-

Template:Agf Please also be careful when using vandalism warnings. Only clear, obvious vandalism qualifies for use of the vandalism warning templates. It's also quite improper to revert an edit where the editor is following a request template left on the page. --Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 14:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wick Ferry

why did you remove ferry wick? levi15791

Aquamania

Hi, and thanks for your comment on my talk page! My edit to Aquamania was in fact reverting vandalism by 72.152.113.250 -- there has been a lot of vandalism by anonymous IPs to that particular article for some reason. (As you can see from its history). I can assure you that the information I removed was completely factually wrong. --Bonadea 22:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Juvisy-sur-Orge; Independence Movies; Shade (Inheritance); Marapets; Metropolitan School District of Lawrence Township; Toronto Catholic District School Board; Raspberry Coke; Konkan; Krum High School; Silicon Integrated Systems; Zar'roc; Angela (Inheritance); Anthony Edwards; John Saunders; Baghdadi Jews; Black magic; Alexander Graham Bell Public School; Ashland High School (Ohio); Manitoba Liquor Control Commission

Cleanup: Maple Place School; GNU GRUB; Vertex
Merge: Henry Hill (mobster); Vicodin; List of major freeway systems
Add Sources: Toronto French School; Busta Rhymes; Pixelization
Wikify: Holy Cross Convent School; Yo; Lindane
Expand: Scanimate; B-Real; Playground games

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 14:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coca-Cola GA

The GA has been on hold for a while now -- two weeks, as of tomorrow. There were some irregularities, and of course the holidays, but I'd like to clear it. Was wondering whether you were finished with your edits, or, if not, whether you're likely to be soon. Shimeru 21:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Avenue (Brooklyn)

I declined the speedy deletion request for this article because streets aren't covered under A7. Try sending it to AFD. --Core desat 23:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alpharetta Elementary School

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Alpharetta Elementary School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. — Swpb ^{talk contribs} 03:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The idea behind the prod tag is that it is useful for non-controversial pages which don't meet speedy deletion requirements. As the page exists currently, notability is not asserted per WP:SCHOOL, and I strongly doubt many editors without a conflict of interest would vote to keep it. If the prod tag is removed and/or significant changes to the content are made, then there would likely be enough controversy to warrant an AfD, but I feel at this point that an AfD would be a waste of editors' time. — Swpb ^{talk contribs} 20:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though, if you disagree, there is nothing stopping you from taking it to AfD. — Swpb ^{talk contribs} 20:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA on Yeast

Hi Natl1, I noticed that you changed your mind on GA for the Yeast article. Was just wondering if there's anything in particular that needs fixing on it before its promotion is more clear-cut. Thanks. ◄§ĉҺɑʀκs► 07:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Campeonato Brasileiro

Hi Natl, seems like you've got some job with this Ragnarok troll. Not only he reverted again but deleted your warning from his talk page. Actually welcome to the club, YOU are now the pseuso-admin troll one. :-) Seems like this fellow is obsessed of "alternative" views as shown by his defense of a satanic Ubuntu linux version to counterweight the christian edition... I guess he would defend the right to say that the world is square and flat.

Hi Natl, thanks so far for the support. It helped to quiet for one week but you see this is no easy task as he resumed 1) though finally discussing he's not bringing any argument and is ignoring previous discussions and 2) even making a revert war with you on his own talk page !... I would say that there is pretty much evidence so as to refer him to some blocking procedure. 21JuL74 14:57, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rehi, Natl. Seems like Ragnarok is indeed aggressive. Instead of asking for mediation he went directly for a request for blocking the page, which he obtained. I would ask you could show Husond, the admin, that there was a due process going or please tell what I would need to do. Regards, 21JuL74 23:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: as I supposed , this Ragnarok has asked for vandalism alert on me despite not even following any warning procedure. I guess it won't work if wiki is reasonable and follow the rules, though I surprised that his request for blocking the page was quickly accepted (I guess thatś what I should have done first place...). Can you help if you don't want to get in this mess with an admin contact taht could unprotect the page and well, really report his attitude and eventually block him (i wouldn't call vandalism as this can be a dispute content but his methods are borderline vandal and always turning thinsgs around to look like a victim) ? Regards 21JuL74 23:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support

Thank you for your support in the RfA on my behalf. It is an honor to have received your expression of confidence. To be chosen as an administrator requires a high level of confidence by a broad section of the community. Although I received a great deal of support, at this time I do not hold the level of confidence required, and the RfA did not pass. It is my wish that I will continue to deserve your confidence. Sincerely, --BostonMA ^talk 20:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AutoWikiBrowser

Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. Regrettably, I have declined your request as you do not have 500 mainspace edits. You are welcome to apply again at a later time. Feel free to contact me with any questions, alphachimp 00:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coca Cola

Hi Natl1,

The word "however" implies that there would be some kind of contradiction between the two sentences, but there isn't one. The second one just goes to further explain the first. So I wasn't sure eithe the word however needs to be removed or there is a "not" missing in the first sentence.

Maybe that's just me, but I think those senteces sound kind of weird right now.

BTW, great work on that article and I was glad to see you put some of my suggestions into action.

--Carabinieri 20:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Coca Cola Squamate

I'll review it and get back to you. Squamate 14:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page. Cheers Maustrauser 13:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nawalic Acid

The fact that it comes up with no hits on google in a worry - cos normally a simple chemical name will be found on a suppliers website. Anyway I checked the main supplier in the UK - sigma aldrich - again no luck with name or structure!.

So I will go and have a look at the refs on the journal - only looked at the Journal or Organic chemistry which exists but does not mention this chemical anyway.

I think that is enough for the mo for you to get on with, give me a shout if you ever need any more help on this or anything else Cheers Lethaniol 16:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Peloponnesian War as this week's WP:ACID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Peloponnesian War was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 12:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User warnings have been updated

Heya, take a quick look at WP:UTM. Looks like we have a new set of warning messages. Cheers! --Brad Beattie (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support

As you set out for Ithaka, hope the voyage is long
Knowledge is your destiny, but don't ever hurry the journey
May there be many summer mornings when
With what pleasure and joy, you come into harbors seen for the first time

Don't expect Ithaka to make you rich. Ithaka gave you the marvelous journey
And, if I, one of your fellow-travellers, can offer something
To make this journey of yours even more fascinating and enjoyable
This is my assistance with anything I can help.

RfA nomination

Thank you so much, I am flattered to see you think I'm doing a good job. However, I afraid I have to decline the nomination for now. Arjun01 is already planning to nominate me on March or April, and I have quite a few goals I would like to accomplish prior to it. I'll be glad if you'd co-nominate me though. :) Michaelas10 (Talk) 13:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA. I think valid criticisms were raised in areas that I need to work on, so I've withdrawn my name. I intend to work on addressing the concerns that were raised, and think I need to work contributing without allowing myself to become as stressed as I have been at times, which did result in some inappropriate behavior. Perhaps I may re-explore adminship at some point in the future, but it's a little early to consider that. Again, thank you. Fan-1967 21:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]