Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful Betsy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 04:51, 6 February 2022 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kroombit Tops National Park. j⚛e deckertalk 23:20, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful Betsy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed PROD. Fails WP:GNG: non-notable crash of a military aircraft. No Wikinotable people involved, no evidence of changes in procedures or policies, no WP:PERSISTENCE. The fact the wreck still exists does not confer notability, and Wikipedia is not a memorial. The Bushranger One ping only 02:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 02:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 02:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. The Bushranger One ping only 02:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Citations do not make a topic notable, only verifiable. The WikiProject aircraft long ago decided that individual aircraft and their histories are not notable as such, it is only the wider context that can bring notability. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
...and very few of those citations are actually for this Beautiful Betsy. Moswento talky 13:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.