Jump to content

User talk:Krish!

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Krish! (talk | contribs) at 11:19, 14 March 2022 (→‎Page block). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

Hello

Hello, Comes to know that you are the person who wrote the article unfinished. If possible, please write about Draft:SONA New York, Priyanka Chopra's new Indian restaurant in United States. A page reviewer moved the article into draft space while I was editing. Now I lack confidence.

Thank you. YogeshWarahTalk 13:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Hero: Love Story of a Spy

On 4 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Hero: Love Story of a Spy, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2003 spy thriller The Hero: Love Story of a Spy was Priyanka Chopra's first Bollywood film? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Hero: Love Story of a Spy. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Hero: Love Story of a Spy), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Can any of the administrators delete all of my today's edits from articles and talk pages? I am not a political person and I don't want to get into political stuff. I stumbled upon a biased film article and tried to correct it but was reverted. Seems like people have no empathy. I never thought this unwanted and such a small thing would get so tiresome. Not good for my mental health. Pleased delete my today's edits. Thank you.Krish | Talk To Me 13:52, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to self-revert your own edits, but unless there are very specific reasons for hiding your edits, they will not be deleted. If you want more help, change the {{help me-helped}} back into a {{help me}}, stop by the Teahouse, or Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. Primefac (talk) 14:20, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARBIPA sanctions reminder

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I know what's the point of this warning masquerading as an innocent message being posted on my talk, Kautilya3? I don't give a damn about politics and these so-called "restricted" and "hidden" sections of Wikipedia. I don't have any interest, BTW. I just edited a film article regarding its reception where I stumbled upon unknowingly and the whole "secret society of Wikipedia" got threatened? Says a lot about this site.Krish | Talk To Me 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have received an ARBIPA alert before, which has now expired and so I gave a renewed alert.
The film you speak about is an Indian film dealing with Indian situations and politics and is very well covered under the ARBIPA sanctions. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is discussing Holocaust or movies about that also under sanctions? So how is it different for a similar thing that happened in the Indian region of Kashmir? And, also FYI, my "edits" which were reverted BTW, were not even related to the film but how the reception section was written. So are we not even allowed to question bias and lack of NPOV, which is an important rule on Wikipedia? Glad these sanctions are not in real life as that film might not have been made or released. Don't worry I will not touch any political article here as it's not my cup of tea.Krish | Talk To Me 15:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Guideline

Please consult WP:TALK#REVISE. Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 09:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Page block

You have been blocked from editing The Kashmir files for two months for tendentious editing. Please see [1] for more details. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 11:09, 14 March 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Bishonen Thank you for blocking me to edit this page. Now I don't have to worry about my mental health. Also, I don't have time for Wikipedia like I used to have. So, it's really a blessing that I am barred from editing that page. So I am not going to appeal.Krish | Talk To Me 11:19, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]