User talk:Lord 0f Avernus

Welcome!

Welcome message!

Hello, Lord 0f Avernus! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Vengeance 01 (talk) 15:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

I've reverted you at Vaishali (ancient city)

Partially because it's a copyright violation and I'll give you a separate notice for that that clarifies our policy. But mainly because it's patently ridiculous to claim that "Vaishali was comprised of three districts. The first district had 7000 houses with golden towers. The middle had 14000 houses with silver towers, and the last district possessed 21000 houses with copper towers." Can't you see how impossible that is? Doug Weller talk 09:44, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me about the copyright rule, wasnt aware. Rest i do not judge logic in ancient things people wrote in a published books. Since you considered this a fringe book , i will give reference to source book itself , which is pre 19th century. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 14:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that's a bit like saying we can write that the moon is made of green cheese because an old book says it is. No city ever had even a fraction of its houses made with such towers. Doug Weller talk 15:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i went through the original source referenced and it was a german translation of tibbetan folklore by Schiefner, so it isnt relevant here. Wont be adding that info. Thanks for pointing this out.Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 19:36, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you. Doug Weller talk 07:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Muslim Rajputs, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Heba Aisha (talk) 09:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please check my edit, on the contrary i have reverted an earlier edit which deleted sections without disussion on talk page.i dont understand why are you warning me instead of him.dont try intimidating new editors. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 09:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CASTEID

@Sitush: i went through the following discussion WP:CASTEID but still confused about what is the guidelines regarding addition of caste info in a BLP article. I came across many blp of politicians where caste is mentioned and was starting to add similar info myself when i remembered having seen this discussion. Could you please clarify , or give me the link where a definite policy regarding this has been finalized. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 08:38, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bina Singh has been accepted

Bina Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 14:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjay Kumar Singh (politician) has been accepted

Sanjay Kumar Singh (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheWikiholic (talk) 14:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moving Drafts to Mainspace

While you have every right to do this you have left a mess behind you for others to clear up. Please check your work after you make a move. Leaving the clutter behind is tantamount to WP:DISRUPTIVE. Please go back and clean up behind yourself 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: Hi, I just got the permission to move drafts to articles and not aware of the mess it can leave behind, please guide me for the same or give me the link to the wikipedia page which tells how to clean up, I would be more than happy to do it. Thanks & Apologies for the inconvenience caused. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 17:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is this 'permission' to move the drafts? – robertsky (talk) 18:07, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

extended auto confirmed right, anyway could someone tell me what needs to be cleaned, so that i can clean up any mess left behind Lord 0f Avernus (talk) Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 18:09, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the ones you have moved. Do they look like articles, or are there banners and comments at the top for the drafting process?

When you move something please always check the end result.

That we MAY do something does not alwasy mean we SHOULD do it 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: yes i read the WP:AFC page just now, and understand the mistake i did and regret the inconvenience. Please let me know , if i could be of help in any way , in speeding up the cleanup process. I assure i would remember this rule in future. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 18:40, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just please tidy the drafts you moved to be articles. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: Ok, I am on it, i will delete any AFC tags or comment on main page and also remove afc categories from the articles, anything else to be done? Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 18:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: clean up done, please verify and let me know if anything is missing yet. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 20:35, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I trusted you to do it once you knew. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:38, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ajay Kr. Singh already exists as Ajay Singh (Lakhisarai politician)

Please check that Draft:Ajay Kr. Singh already exists as Ajay Singh (Lakhisarai politician) Botu Yadav (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Botu Yadav:, will send my draft for a speedy deletion, is there also a page for Ajay singh, RJD MLC from munger? Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 09:17, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord 0f Avernus: Yes and you can check it yourself also. Thank You –Botu Yadav (talk) 09:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Shyam Singh has been accepted

Sanjeev Shyam Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 20:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abhishek Mishra death case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abhishek Mishra death case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Mishra death case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev Kumar Singh (April 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 511KeV was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev Kumar Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sanjeev Kumar Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_signed,511KeV ^(talk) 11:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lord 0f Avernus! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! _signed,511KeV ^(talk) 11:22, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ajay Kumar Singh (Bihar politician, Rashtriya Janata Dal) has been accepted

Ajay Kumar Singh (Bihar politician, Rashtriya Janata Dal), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a suggestion to better disambiguate the politicians of the same name, I am open to hear. – robertsky (talk) 18:04, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Robertsky: Thanks, looks good. It's a very common name in this part of the world. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 18:10, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bijay Kumar Singh (Indian politician) has been accepted

Bijay Kumar Singh (Indian politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 17:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of intent

Hi,

This is regarding the edits I have made post joining Wikipedia. I was trying to show a friend few things about the edit. Which nevertheless I was going to revert in any case. But I thank you for guiding and reverting the same to default.

I have noted about the sandbox feature and will use the same for such usage in future.

Regards Indiangengiskhan (talk) 18:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I have seen you are doing good edits in number of articles. This is in order to recognise your fine works and helpful behaviour. Heba Aisha (talk) 19:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Admantine123. I noticed that you recently removed content from Khagaul without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hey, you may search sources as going through language, it seems that it's not completely irrelevant. Admantine123 (talk) 10:50, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I explained in the edit summary that I am removing irrelevant "Aryabhatta biographical info" from an article on place, which was unsourced as well. If you feel it should remain there, open a discussion section in talk page, instead of putting notice on my user page. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 11:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding recent revert

Hello, Lord 0f Avernus, regarding your recent revert on this article, Special:MobileDiff/1089858203, you pointed out how Battle of Kama is unrelated to this particular article. Please take a look again, this battle was fought between Jaipur kingdom [Kachwaha's] & Bharatpur kingdom [Jat-Sikh army]; not a Mughal-Rajput confrontation. The editor deliberately or accidentally placed this battle there. Anyway, leader of Kachwaha army was not Ajit Singh, it was Madho Singh as far as my knowledge is concerned. Thanks. Packer&Tracker «Talk» 15:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look at it, thanks for bringing it to my attention with precise points. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 06:45, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simple, self-revert yourself there as the battle is not even remotely related to context of the article. It's not rocket science !!! Packer&Tracker «Talk» 12:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I dont have time, revert it yourself Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 14:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And watch your tone, what do u mean by "its not rocket science", maintain civility Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 14:06, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]