The unwashed masses

Too many pings

Hi Metro2fsb. You keep linking my username, and that of other editors, repeatedly on multiple pages and in edit summaries. This is generating many notifications, to the point of disruption. Please stop. Let me know if you have any questions about this. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:35, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same complaint about this very strange behaviour. Please stop it. CT55555(talk) 05:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

====User:Metro2fsb====

CT55555: can you help? Doctor Lisa how are you today man/woman

This editor deleted a lot of material who can i ask to get it back? So I can attribute it correctly?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DanCherek#Sources

Metro2fsb (talk) 10:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

9 January 2023 CT55555 writes:

Wikipedia_talk:Miscellany_for_deletion#Help_request

9 January 2023 Firefangledfeathers posts:

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Metro2fsb

I'm just acting as a middleman for CT55555. See below for their rationale. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:06, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user page looks like an article and I therefore think it could mislead people and should be deleted as per my understanding of WP:USERPAGE CT55555(talk) 04:10, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the janitors are more powerful then the content creators on Wikipedia. Fair assessment? Can you help with Draft:Council for Foreign and Defense Policy?

Can you help with Draft:Council for Foreign and Defense Policy? User talk:CT55555 (e-mailed "them" for help on Doctor Lisa), User:Firefangledfeathers (created MFD) and User talk:DanCherek (Deleted comments on Doctor Lisa)?

Draft:Council for Foreign and Defense Policy (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doctor Lisa (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Metro2fsb (talk) 04:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is what it is in regards too (Above). I didn't know there was a "ping" rule. I invite all good faith editors to help add content to Draft:Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, Doctor Lisa and Elizaveta Glinka. Thus far the 3 of you have not contributed to Doctor Lisa instead I get warnings on my talk page. Metro2fsb (talk) 05:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You pinged me, and a bunch of other users, in this null edit to a closed MfD. Why? Can you please stop pinging? Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 06:07, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Doctor Lisa

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doctor Lisa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:42, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! Metro2fsb (talk) 15:24, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

imbd plots - Thus sayeth the Lord

Hey @Metro2fsb, generally speaking, plots don't actually require sourcing. For reference though, IMDB is generally not considered a reliable source. WP:RS/IMDB Metro2fsb (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Independent Institute for Social Policy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Independent Institute for Social Policy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 14:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Independent Institute for Social Policy Metro2fsb (talk) 04:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

An article you recently created, Center for Economic and Financial Research, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, first place {{AfC submission|T}} atop the article, publish, then click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Silikonz💬 14:52, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Independent Institute for Social Policy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Independent Institute for Social Policy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 217.33.116.183 (talk) 08:04, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sumit Yadav Metro2fsb (talk) 15:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Independent Institute for Social Policy Metro2fsb (talk) 04:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Russian International Studies Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Russian International Studies Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 217.33.116.183 (talk) 08:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Institute for Social Policy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Independent Institute for Social Policy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. $Salvio giuliano$ 08:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to my user talk page

May I ask why you are repeatedly copying the speedy deletion notices from your talk page to mine? 217.33.116.183 (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you..--Bbb23 (talk) 00:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archived: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Metro2fsb

Will respond this weekend (February 11 - February 12 2023) in request to be unblocked. Metro2fsb (talk) 04:27, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Metro2fsb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

here to build an encyclopedia see below Metro2fsb (talk) 07:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not quite sure how that demonstrates your readiness to build an encyclopedia. — Daniel Case (talk) 08:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Template editor

Council for Foreign and Defense Policy (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doctor Lisa (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Elizaveta Glinka (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Draft:Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Draft:Independent Institute for Social Policy (IISP) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Institute for US and Canadian Studies (ISKRAN) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Draft:Russian International Studies Association aka Russian Studies Association (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Russian espionage in the United States (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Committee on International Affairs of the State Duma (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Metro2fsb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

here to build an encyclopedia see my article contributions. Metro2fsb (talk) 03:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I can accept that you might mean well, but your contributions don't make up for the issues with your editing in general, and you do not adequately address those issues in this request, so I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Metro2fsb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for being uppity to the people at the top of the Wikipedia food chain. I will be more kind and more subservient to those who are admins and bureaucrats. I will thank these tireless editors, when they delete my research that I spent hours on. I will treat them with the utmost respect that they deserve, they have earned it, through years of janitorial work stopping real vandals. Metro2fsb (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I apologize for being uppity to the people at the top of the Wikipedia food chain.  I will be more kind and more subservient to those who are admins and bureaucrats. I will thank these tireless editors, when they delete my research that I spent hours on.  I will treat them with the utmost respect that they deserve, they have earned it, through years of janitorial work stopping real vandals.  [[User:Metro2fsb|Metro2fsb]] ([[User talk:Metro2fsb#top|talk]]) 04:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize for being uppity to the people at the top of the Wikipedia food chain.  I will be more kind and more subservient to those who are admins and bureaucrats. I will thank these tireless editors, when they delete my research that I spent hours on.  I will treat them with the utmost respect that they deserve, they have earned it, through years of janitorial work stopping real vandals.  [[User:Metro2fsb|Metro2fsb]] ([[User talk:Metro2fsb#top|talk]]) 04:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I apologize for being uppity to the people at the top of the Wikipedia food chain.  I will be more kind and more subservient to those who are admins and bureaucrats. I will thank these tireless editors, when they delete my research that I spent hours on.  I will treat them with the utmost respect that they deserve, they have earned it, through years of janitorial work stopping real vandals.  [[User:Metro2fsb|Metro2fsb]] ([[User talk:Metro2fsb#top|talk]]) 04:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

User:Fences and windows please review. You seem like a reasonable guy. :)

Your GA nomination of Doctor Lisa

The article Doctor Lisa you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Doctor Lisa for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Premeditated Chaos -- Premeditated Chaos (talk) 21:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]