Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lairhillock Inn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There doesn't appear to be a consensus that anything is worth merging. RL0919 (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lairhillock Inn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod tag removed without explanation as usual. Literally none of this article or its references is about the Inn itself, and I can't find sources attesting to notability. A self-appellation of "historic" doesn't doesn't go that far in the UK... Reywas92^Talk 20:07, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gillybrands Reywas92^Talk 03:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Netherley, Aberdeenshire. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing in the article indicates it is notable for anything other than the fact that it exists near certain locations and it is not a listed building. Hintswen Talk | Contribs 05:31, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I only found mentions in restaurant listings etc, nothing to indicate any historical significance. There were claims it was up to 200 years old, which isn't very old for a coaching inn.----Pontificalibus 06:11, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 12:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unless I am missing something there is nothing in the article to indicate that the Inn has any claim to notability other than its age which as User:Pontificalibus is not actually that great. Indeed much of the article is about the route it is on and what is nearby rather than the Inn itself. Dunarc (talk) 22:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There is nothing in the article to suggest any significance to this inn, and most of the details are only of peripheral relevance to the inn. (I placed the original "prod" tag that was removed.) --94.196.164.61 (talk) 16:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. An earl and a marquess once might have slept there. Not even Washington or the Queen? Bearian (talk) 21:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge briefly to the article on the road. Note that this was a drovers road not a carriage road. The army would have passed on foot or horseback, not with carriages. The outcome should be similar to that for Gillybrands. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 03:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.