Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Gaffney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Liz (talk | contribs) at 06:33, 13 July 2023 (→‎Jacob Gaffney: Closed as delete (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. and lightly salted. Liz Read! Talk! 06:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Gaffney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted [1] - subject still likely to fail WP:NBIO. Not seeing anything that would demonstrate SIGCOV - just a number of non-notable business ventures with minimal coverage. KH-1 (talk) 07:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete PROMO, wow. 19 yr old person that isn't notable. There seems to be some scandal with the business/enterprise thing but I can't find much more than PR sources; even then there are less than 6 of them, not even much paid promo. Oaktree b (talk) 12:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This seems very much like WP:PAID work and is heavy on PROMO. Most sources are not directly about the individual he is just mentioned. Not to mention the article is extremely hard to read in a normal manner. Grahaml35 (talk) 12:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The author of the first version, Shyguy125 (now blocked), also removed the tags from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob T. Gaffney
Clearly bad faith editing. Both "Jacob T. Gaffney" and "Jacob Gaffney" should be salted.
Jacob Gaffney is not yet 20; he has a long time left to earn his article here.
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 18:44, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.