Jump to content

User talk:Jack Daw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs) at 00:24, 28 November 2023 (ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Welcome!

Hello, Jack Daw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AndyZ 15:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha. Interesting - your point on Ayn Rand. Seems logical. I assume by the way, that, having no user page, you may be from Rheims, France? As in [1] or The Ingoldsby Legends. Attracted to bring gew-gaws (today: bling). I have a pseudonym, too: J. O. Note (Johnny One...) Hmmm Carrionluggage 15:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC) I did not really think you were from Rheims - just thought you might have gotten the name from that story. I am a Friend (Quaker), though I teeter sometimes towards a more agnostic view. I put in the fact that I am a Christian mainly because those pests in the Intelligent Design community seem to think all scientists are atheists. Quakers do not have churches - they have Meetinghouses. Best regards, Carrionluggage 19:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of U.S. states pop

[edit]

Found a better reference for the article: http://www.census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann-est.html Kaldari 16:07, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jack (warning removed) - Glen TC (Stollery) 14:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

[edit]

There's a reason it says "Please leave this line alone." It's fine that you're carrying out experiments, but please do it below the heading. Thanks. --Mr. Lefty Talk to me! 19:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

6-OXO

[edit]

Hi Jack Daw,

In response to your comment regarding androstenetrione, the evidence I've seen for its rising popularity is admittedly sketchy. From what I've seen on internet bodybuilding forums, since the US prohormone ban 4-AT has been used as a 'natural' way to increase testosterone presumably for those not comfortable with full-blown steroid use. It's also used as a component of post-cycle therapy

If you want to modify or even remove that statement I wouldn't object since I don't have any solid references to give you. --Bk0 (Talk) 01:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it deserves at least a mention in the supplements page because in the absence of prohormones it is a significantly used substance (not just the '6-OXO' branded product but also bulk powder and generic capsuled supplements).
The studies seem to show that it works (see the androstenetrione article for references). In my experience (I only tried it once) I did experience markedly oily skin and increased libido which leads me to believe that it does increase test levels. I did not, however, notice any strength or mass increases beyond what I had been getting before. I think that for younger men with normal testosterone levels it isn't cost-effective when used by itself, for older men or for steroid users looking for a tamoxifen replacement it might be valuable. --Bk0 (Talk) 02:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response from Mehrenberg

[edit]

I am an internist Mehrenberg 22:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Medicine WikiProject

[edit]

Hi Jack,

I've noticed you edited medical articles: you might be interested in joining WikiProject Medicine, a collaborative effort of Wikipedias to improve articles related to medicine? No medical expertise required!

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 12:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again,
Well, there are many ways to contribute: just browse around in the project and you'll automatically find something that you might be interested in. The box to the right has some important pages. There are actually a bunch of Medicine-related WikiProjects, but WP:MED is the main project, with a subdivision in clinical (WP:CLINMED) and preclinical (WP:PRECLINMED), and further subdivisions.
I'm on WikiHoliday, if you have any questions you can also ask one of the many friendly people on the list of participants, were you can list yourself!
cu round, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weight training

[edit]

I've finished as much of the merger of weight training as possible, I'd love comments. Mostly what I did was take out the info that was duplicated in strength training and tried to highlight how weight training differs from the other types of strength training. Help! WLU 02:05, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, you had this added to your talk page 'cause you voted on the merger of WT, ST, RT. WLU

Re: Timeline of web browsers picture

[edit]

I would recommend simply using an SVG-capable web browser such as Opera, Firefox or Safari. Alternatively try the Adobe SVG Viewer. --ADeveria 14:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-- Addbot (talk) 00:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maen. K. A. (talk) 23:40, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on A Life Apart: Hasidism in America requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A new medical resource

[edit]

Please note that there is a new freely accessible medical resource, MedMerits (to which I'm a medical advisor) on neurologic disorders. A discussion on ELs to MedMerits and medical ELs in general is currently in progress ("Wikipedia and its relationship to the outside world"). Presto54 (talk) 18:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Medicine

[edit]

Hi

I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page.

Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders.

Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

[edit]

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
  • Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
  • If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Jack Daw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jack Daw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Jack Daw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]