Talk:IBM

IBM and the seven dwarve/fs

Although the nickname Big Blue is brought up, there is no mention of the phrase and concept of IBM and the seven dwarfs /dwarves. See, e.g., http://www.dvorak.org/blog/ibm-and-the-seven-dwarfs-dwarf-one-burroughs/Kdammers (talk) 03:21, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Huge change in employment

Why is there no mention of the huge number of employees that were laid off in the early noughties and class suite that went with it. That article looks as though it has been whitewashed. scope_creep^Talk 17:09, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

IBMers?

Is it encyclopedic to refer to IBM employees as IBMers throughout the article? To an outsider this seems distracting and unnecessary, bordering on WP:PROMOTION, when the more straightforward "IBM employees" would do just fine. The article on Google for example doesn't use the term "Googlers" at all. Is there any MoS guideline we can turn to for this? Stonkaments (talk) 04:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Stonkaments A good observation. I'm not sure about a guideline, but I was surprised by a cursory search and the number of sources that refer to them as IMBers Troubadour34 (talk) 03:16, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

IBM logo color change in 2021

to Vt320 Guy_Harris Can you attach a current IBM logo (black and white colors) to the IBM article, if you can confirm that IBM changed the recommended colors of its logo to black and white?

ITjungle mentioned the new IBM logo in accompanying discussion of the newer IBM i logo in this article.

EWLwiki (talk) 02:17, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

References

This is a misunderstanding, there is no new IBM corporation logo. ITjungle used a hastily composed lineage logo collection, included the black-and white metric template as last version from the original page... As you can see in the official source ("8-Bar"), there is no change in recommended colors, blue and black is equally there: "The IBM core colors, consisting of the blue and gray families, are used when applying color specifically to the 8-bar logo." Madacs (talk) 09:09, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

1939-1945

I notice that, in the history section, no mention is made of anything notable that IBM was doing between the years of 1939 and 1945. I wonder why that is? 🤔 206.195.157.47 (talk) 16:23, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Because this page is astroturfed by IBM and no mention of their actions during the holocaust is allowed 50.39.108.1 (talk) 03:38, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

Q1 labs?

I was looking to find some more information about the company Q1 labs, which was a cybersecurity company founded in Fredericton, New Brunswick. It redirected here, which makes sense as it was later bought out by IBM, but there’s no information on this page about Q1 labs. There’s definitely info out there - there’s a decent amount on the page for Brendan Hannigan, one of the founders - but I’m not sure where that should be aggregated 130.113.109.111 (talk) 04:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Picture of headquarters

I removed the picture of the entrance of the Armonk headquarters a while ago, because I don't think it's informative. IBM is quite spread out globally and not much of its personnel is actually located there. On top of that, it's a pretty bad picture with a tree blocking the view of the building. @User:Farzam.akbarian86 added back the picture. Can we reach a consensus on what to do here? PhotographyEdits (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

• Support the removal of the image File:IBM CHQ - Oct 2014.jpg from the article. General Ization ^Talk 20:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
• Comment It is quite typical for many companies especially large listed ones to have their headquarters included in the infobox as an illustration. Now that said, this is not exactly a good image especially for one representing the headquarters of a company as big as IBM. So rather I support a better photo. - Imcdc Contact 01:14, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Paid promotion?

This article looks seriously edited by pro-IBM parties. 93.195.161.235 (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Remove leadership and development section from history

The paragraph about leadership and development, and the paragraph about exceptional contributors, are both out of place and don't belong in the history section, particularly in the area between the 30's and 50's. They have nothing to do with the history of IBM and they certainly don't belong in the section discussing WWII. 192.102.209.46 (talk) 20:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Founders

Is Watson Sr. really a cofounder of IBM? Seems like he joined in 1914, but IBM was founded in 1911 by Flint. - Indefensible (talk) 01:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Is this a joke?

The section "allegations of racism" cites Tucker Carlson (not a reliable source, for anything) associating DEI programs with "racism". This can't be serious? Jonathan f1 (talk) 07:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Yes, this is a verified source. Please watch the video. Arvind Krishna has clearly stated he gives bonuses if his gender and ethnic hiring goals are met and if not, the bonuses are not given. Have a look at the entire video. This video of Arvind Krishna is present at many sites. It is indeed him speaking. Sleeplessmason (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I have removed the content Fox News is unreliable per WP:FOXNEWSPOLITICS, and the way "racism" is interpreted appears to be original research. The source would need to directly accuse IBM of being racist. —Panamitsu (talk) 08:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not simply delete another editor's contribution. I have adjusted the heading to address your concern, but to simply remove the entire section is improper.

Wikipedia has a well-defined and structured approach for moderating disputes among its contributors.

Discussion here, or 3O, or the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard.

There are other means to resolve your concern. Sleeplessmason (talk) 08:21, 3 January 2024 (UTC)