Talk:2015 State of the Union Address

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2015 State of the Union Address article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from 2015 State of the Union Address appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 February 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 2015 State of the Union Address was the first State of the Union Address in which the President of the United States used the words "gay", "lesbian", and "transgender"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2015 State of the Union Address.

Wikipedia

Barack Obama Start‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

United States: Presidents / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Comments prior to the speech

We know this is going to happen in three months, so why try to avoid it. Cancina5645 (talk) 23:15, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What sources do you have that the listed topics will be discussed in the speech? As an encyclopedia such claims need to be sourced. WP:CRYSTALBALL seems relevant. 331dot (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An encyclopedia should be practical too, and address the future events. If it is an event that will happen in two months (in January), then I feel the article can stay, and in mid-December, editors will be able to add sources and expand the article. I don't think there is a point to delete it. Cancina5645 (talk) 00:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The point is that there has to be some kind of sources in the article. I see looking at the page history that another editor had turned the page into a redirect, which (if this is not outright deleted) is what should happen. When there are sources for potential content in this article, the redirect can then be removed. 331dot (talk) 00:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so I have until November 10 to add a source. Cancina5645 (talk) 01:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair I will inform you that you would be within your rights to remove the PROD if you wish, though that would not prevent the commencement of a full AfD discussion. 331dot (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]