Jump to content

User talk:Ryulong

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Wavetwista (talk | contribs) at 09:31, 2 April 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

My local time:
September 2024
Monday
6:58 pm EST
Archives

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng



Hadouken!

Can I ask why you SALTed the Hadouken! article? Wavetwista 09:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indefblocked Tags

I guess I didn't need to add those? :) Yankees76 04:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That means the page gets deleted. And we don't want that.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I see. Cool, I didn't know that. Thanks! Yankees76 04:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to go with {{sockpuppetconfirmed|Burgz33}} because there is no doubt that they are sockpuppets. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 04:33, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
{{blockedsock|Burgz33}} is much better.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Verdict range block

You pointed out: "User talk:213.113.231.176"

Thanks. I left a message on that user's talk page. I believe this is Verdict (talk · contribs) requesting an unblock even though he knows he's banned. If not, whoever it is can email the unblock-en list. --Yamla 05:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Declined based on your message.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny the Vandal

What's with this guy? I declined quite a few requests of his in the past 10 minutes or so. —210physicq (c) 05:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Garcia must get bored very easily.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But this easily? Come on, this sock/block/sock/block cycle is verging on ridiculous. —210physicq (c) 05:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I know I shut down his last factory. And his IP is blocked from creating any more sockpuppets.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He's at it again. —210physicq (c) 06:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He had to find a new picture since I blacklisted the middle finger—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:01, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User Page

Hello Ryulong. I would like to semi protect my user page. Can you help me? Where do I go? How do I do it? King Lopez Contribs 05:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

I see no reason why it should be done.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just don't want any vandals to attack my user page in the future. Is it something that only administratiors can do? King Lopez Contribs 05:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

No one's done anything there. I won't protect it.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok well thanks anyway. King Lopez Contribs 06:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Re: 24.21.212.208

Thanks for helping out with this anon user. I really did try to be reasonable and explain why I was reverting them. But, as we well know, it's easier to hit Caps Lock and vent than actually reconsider one's actions. Cheers, Caknuck 06:57, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think we'll need to protect his talk page if he insists on using it to make personal attacks. Caknuck 07:09, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jetix

Will you stop removing those Jetix shows from Jetix templates & stop removing Jetix category that the shows is only on Jetix? HMR 11:31 Apri 1, 2007 (UTC)

The issue is those shows were stated as being original to Jetix, when the articles clearly state that they are not.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, So I renamed Original Jetix Shows into Shows only on Jetix. 11:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

And PR isn't only on Jetix.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

What a mess. Too many edits to too many sections at the same time. – Chacor 10:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you'll find this diff interestingRyūlóng (竜龍) 10:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that, and tried to replace it, and managed to revert someone else's edits too, so gave up. – Chacor 10:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And, of course, reverting myself made even more of a mess, so... it's not worth it. I won't be surprised to get caught on 3RR (I reverted one comment by the troll four times, the last time accidental in that botched revert of Prob), either. – Chacor 10:42, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And Mel Elitis has referenced the Straight Outta Lynwood fiasco, just as Tony Sidaway basically predicted in a private conversation. I'm going to sleep now (for real). Could you take on the reigns?—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 10:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm probably gonna call it an editing day too. Too busy, not worth getting caught on a technicality. – Chacor 10:45, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Thanks for reverting my user pages that were blanked. Koweja 13:50, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclones WikiProject Newsletter #11

The April issue of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones newsletter is now available. If you wish to receive the full newsletter or no longer be informed of the release of future editions, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar

User:TeckWiz/Barnstar

Hi - a stub template or category which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 06:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll rename it then.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 06:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]