Jump to content

Talk:Constituent state

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 23:32, 30 January 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Redirect" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Politics}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Untitled

[edit]

I think someone should start an article on this and include info on the constituent states in the UK— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.3.230 (talk) 22:03, 3 July 2004 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constituent state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Constituent state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:34, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constituent state. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning of constituent countries

[edit]

A constituent country is a country which makes up a part of a larger country, or federation.

'Other relationships' Countries may be held (usually by force) as part of a larger country or federation of countries. An example of this was the Soviet Union, which held various countries in eastern Europe by force for up to 70 years. Doremon764 (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Russia has republics instead of constituent countries. 2001:8003:9008:1301:389D:A51C:CBD3:6EFC (talk) 21:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was merged. --Thesmp (talk) 15:58, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Following Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 25#Constituent country I propose merging Constituent state into Administrative division. I think the content in this article (a large jumble of WP:OR/WP:SYNTH will be removed first) can easily be explained in the context of Administrative division, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Administrative division. @Chipmunkdavis: P.S. Another option is to merge into Federated state, although the term 'constituent state' also applied somethimes to parts of unitary states. I notified about this discussion at WikiProject Politics talk page and WikiProject Countries talk page. --Heanor (talk) 16:12, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the article, the vague text that could be merge is more appropriate for Administrative division, given it's synth about different divisions. That said, this title could become a disambiguation page post-merge rather than a redirect. CMD (talk) 16:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The article should be re-named "constituent country". GoodDay (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge to adminstrative division. That's what the subject of this article is, and the sources here don't use this title as a term. Agree with CMD that much of this is vague or synthesis. Reywas92Talk 20:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I support GoodDay's proposal of moving this article to constituent country. 2001:8003:9008:1301:389D:A51C:CBD3:6EFC (talk) 05:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
GoodDay, renamimg "constituent country" was already rejected Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 25#Constituent country. --Heanor (talk) 08:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is also not supported by the sourced in the article. CMD (talk) 09:31, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I still support renaming it "Constituent country". We did have such a named article, which was later changed to a 're-direct'. GoodDay (talk) 19:45, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That makes no sense, the article would have to be totally redone. Federated states are not constituent countries, confederated states are not constituent countries, and breakaway states are not constituent countries. This doesn't match the only countries that actually uses the term "constituent country", which are the UK, Netherlands, and Denmark. Reywas92Talk 00:58, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Constituent country is a special term used only by those three countries. 2001:8003:9008:1301:389D:A51C:CBD3:6EFC (talk) 07:21, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.