Jump to content

Talk:Quiet Power

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 12:52, 3 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Requested move 9 September 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus not to move, therefore not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 19:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Quiet Power: The Secret Strengths of IntrovertsQuiet Power – Per WP:SUBTITLE. (The proposed title already serves as a redirect.) 142.160.89.97 (talk) 00:32, 9 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 21:02, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Hhkohh (talk) 01:02, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Hhkohh: How do you reconcile your position with our book-specific guideline, WP:SUBTITLE, which states:

Usually, a Wikipedia article on a book (or other medium, such as a movie, TV special or video game) does not include its subtitle in the Wikipedia page name, per WP:CONCISE. The only exception to that is short article titles, for disambiguation purposes.

142.160.89.97 (talk) 01:07, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
WP:SUBTITLE is not a policy, just a guideline, see also WP:COMMONNAME and other related policy Hhkohh (talk) 09:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@RCraig09: Given that I don't suspect that either subject would meet our notability standards, why would the book not be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per 142.160.89.97 (talk) 03:22, 9 September 2018 (assuming no competing notable subjects are discovered). This book is almost certainly more specifically searched-for now, though the Wayna and Briggs & Stratton uses arose earlier. I hereby change my opinion. —RCraig09 (talk) 03:53, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.