Jump to content

Talk:Dewey Redman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) at 21:50, 9 February 2024 (Implementing WP:PIQA (Task 26)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Memorial broadcast

[edit]

There will be a memorial broadcast, on Labor Day, September 4, 2006, on WKCR-FM. Dogru144 16:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The link to All About Jazz points to an article that is an un attributed copy of the Jazz Police obit that is already listed, should we include both external links?

This is an uploading error that should be fixed. They are distinctly different articles. Dogru144 01:28, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

References added

[edit]

Thus, I removed the unreferenced tag. Dogru144 01:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Science Fiction

[edit]

Science Fiction should be added to the Ornette Coleman section of "as sideman." There may well be other albums missing; see http://www.discogs.com/artist/Dewey+Redman. 173.149.122.65 (talk) 00:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dewey Redman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:36, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Long list of references

[edit]

There's a section in this article titled General References which has a long list of sources. Were all of these sources used in the writing of this article? If so, why are there are so few citations? If they were not used, why do they appear as references?
Vmavanti (talk) 18:03, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's impossible to tell, I think. I'd suggest two things: 1. the list is too long and 2. most, if not all, should be re-used as in-line sources. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:10, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There are also multiple editions of the same source, and this seems contrary to the general principle of using just the latest version. These could at least be trimmed out. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]