Talk:Ballard Carnegie Library
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ballard Carnegie Library article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Ballard Carnegie Library has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 14, 2007. The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that Seattle's Ballard Carnegie Library remains standing 44 years after it was sold, despite experts' claims that it would not survive an earthquake? |
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Seattle may be able to help! |
I think I'm out of sources
[edit]If anyone else can find some, please let me know or add them in? Aside from subscription news sites (no access) I think I've run dry now. • Lawrence Cohen 18:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- I see that you cite Larry Kreisman of Historic Seattle; have you tried contacting him? Or have you tried contacting the current Ballard branch of the Seattle Public Library? - Jmabel | Talk 02:36, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I suspect that a floor plan might be available somewhere (either from the city archives or from the library system), and that it would be worth someone (probably me) snapping a photo that shows the curved rear. - Jmabel | Talk 03:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Photo from rear now added. - Jmabel | Talk 04:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
- I can track down contact info and e-mail, sure. Good idea. And thanks for the help. • Lawrence Cohen 04:26, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- You can email me and I'll pass along Larry Kreisman's email, but I don't think I should post it here. - Jmabel | Talk 18:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Well, if you could ask him for the names (and dates?) of any additional sources, I could always track them down on my own to build this out further. If that's easier, to just copy/paste whatever list he may be able to provide to here? I wouldn't want to bother him with a cold-call email if you already know him. • Lawrence Cohen 18:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nope, I don't really know him. Never met him face-to-face, though I imagine eventually I will. My only contact with him has been precisely writing him for help with similar sorts of things. So, contact me, I'll get you his email address, and you can make the query. Not really a matter of cold-calling: this is part of what Historic Seattle is about. Hmm. Historic Seattle. No article. I'll remedy that some time. - Jmabel | Talk 02:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- You can email me and I'll pass along Larry Kreisman's email, but I don't think I should post it here. - Jmabel | Talk 18:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I see his email address is posted on the organization's site: see http://www.historicseattle.org/contact/staff.aspx - Jmabel | Talk 18:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
100 square foot lot?
[edit]That would be 10 feet per side.
Even 100 feet square (100 feet per side) sounds a little small. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.207.2 (talk) 21:52, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- It is a little small, but I think it (the latter, that is, 100 feet square) is about right. Certainly roughly accurate in the dimension facing the street; I've never really considered whether the lot is precisely square. - Jmabel | Talk 18:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Up for sale
[edit]Nancy Chaney, Next chapter for a landmark library building in Ballard, Seattle Times, April 1, 2011. - Jmabel | Talk 15:18, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
- I'll follow this up myself. - Jmabel | Talk 03:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
- Landmark status hearing Sept 19: http://www.ballardnewstribune.com/2012/08/23/news/old-carnegie-free-library-landmarks-nomination-ag --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Photo request
[edit]Obviously there are multiple photos of the exterior, but there's only one old, very low resolution photo of the interior at Commons. More interior photos would be excellent, and something showing the current state of the building might be good; it recently changed over to a newer, much more downscale restaurant. There's also something going up next door. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Could use recent interior picture
[edit]I removed |needs-photo=Yes from {{WikiProject United States}} because it has pictures. However, a previous editor indicated in an HTML comment that it would benefit from a picture of the interior. Peaceray (talk) 23:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
"Today" out of date
[edit]The last section, "The building today", ends prior to the landmark designation by the Seattle Landmarks Preservation Board. Here is the designation report in November 2012, http://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/Neighborhoods/HistoricPreservation/Landmarks/RelatedDocuments/ballard-library-designation.pdf . (Roket (talk) 07:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ballard Carnegie Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071210014557/http://historicseattle.org/preservationseattle/youngvoices/defaultSEPT06.htm to http://www.historicseattle.org/preservationseattle/youngvoices/defaultSEPT06.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Art and architecture good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- GA-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- GA-Class Historic sites articles
- Low-importance Historic sites articles
- WikiProject Historic sites articles
- GA-Class Libraries articles
- Low-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- GA-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Washington articles
- Unknown-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- GA-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Wikipedia requested maps in Seattle