Levitin effect
This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (January 2021) |
The Levitin effect is a phenomenon whereby people, even those without musical training, tend to remember songs in the correct key. The finding stands in contrast to the large body of laboratory literature suggesting that such details of perceptual experience are lost during the process of memory encoding, so that people would remember melodies with relative pitch, rather than absolute pitch.
The effect was first documented by Daniel J. Levitin in 1994 and was regarded as a significant result in cognitive psychology.[1][2][3][4] In 2012, the effect was replicated for the first time.[5] There are theories as to the possible development of this effect and a strong differentiation between a person's ability to distinguish relative pitch versus absolute pitch.[citation needed] Cognitive disorders can affect a person's ability to experience the Levitin effect. [citation needed]
Levitin effect studies
[edit]Levitin's original study consisted of 46 volunteer students from Stanford University asked to participate in the study. Upon arrival, the students filled out a background questionnaire and selected two songs from 56 previously chosen CDs. Volunteers then attempted to sing a part of their songs. The study's results showed that 40% of the participants could sing a correct pitch in at least one of their songs. 12% hit the right pitch on both trials, and 44% hit the pitch within two semitones.[1]
The second study was conducted in 2012 and completed in six European Labs. This study was a competitive replication of Levitin's original study. This showed that 25% of participants could sing the correct pitch in at least one of their songs; 4% sang the correct pitches in both songs.[6] These studies demonstrate that people can typically remember songs in a way that is similar to how they heard them, even without a reference to the music. When compared to Levitin's original study, the replication showed a lower trend in the data, indicating that a smaller percentage of the population was able to recall the relative pitch.
More data is needed to understand how much of the population can accurately recall the relative pitch of a selected song.
Possible developments
[edit]Levitin offers possible explanations for this phenomenon, by describing how even young children have this ability to a certain degree, so this ability to recognize musical patterns could be located in the cerebellum of the brain.[7] The cerebellum helps to control balance and coordination, but when listening to music, the cerebellum helps the body interpret rhythm. Researchers at Lawrence Parsons and Peter Fox of University of Texas Health Science Center ran brain scans on conductors and saw an increase of blood flow to the cerebellum when they were following along to sheet music and listening to it at the same time. The scans showed that as the rhythm changed, the amount of blood flow in the cerebellum changed as well.[8] There are a few theories that try and explain this occurrence. One theory states our ancestors needed to synchronize their steps in nature to avoid making more noise than necessary while hunting. Another theory suggests that those early humans who were able to distinguish rudimentary rhythms may have been able to hear and interpret different footsteps making them more attuned to the environment around them and have better survival instincts.[9] Those who distinguish different sounds in the environment were more likely to survive and pass along their genetics. These are just possible theories as to how humans have developed pitch and rhythmic interpretation. There is no distinct evidence proving or disproving these theories.
Absolute vs. relative pitch
[edit]Absolute pitch, also referred to as perfect pitch, is the ability to correctly identify or recreate a sound or pitch without needing a reference. This ability is rare among humans, but there has been shown to be a correlation between those who were exposed to music while they were babies and those who possess this ability. There is also evidence that this can be genetic, meaning that those who have a family member with absolute pitch are more likely to have it as well.[10] Musicians generally consider perfect pitch helpful, but many successful musicians possess only relative pitch, which is the ability to identify changes in pitch and timbre in music.[11] Relative pitch is far more common in the population, and unlike perfect pitch, it is not believed to be based on any musical training or exposure.[citation needed] In fact, this was what Levitin was attempting to show in his experiments. While most humans have an innate ability to distinguish musical intervals, musicians of many backgrounds find extensive ear training, to formalize their understanding, essential. While most of the human population has some general understanding of pitch, there exist people who are truly "tone-deaf." This inability to process and understand changes in pitch, known as amusia, can be congenital or acquired.
Cognitive disorders
[edit]There are certain disorders in the brain that can prevent someone from having the ability to perceive relative pitch. These disorders can be congenital or developed. Amusia is a term used to describe someone who has difficulty differentiating pitch or identifying music. Congenital amusia is often referred to as being tone-deaf. Those with congenital amusia can process speech, differences in people's voices and hear environmental sounds, but most cannot identify patterns in music.[12] They describe it as not being able to "hear" music, which sounds like somebody banging different pots and pans, rather than a rhythmic melody. The level of amusia can differ too. Some people can distinguish different songs and "hear" the music, while others have absolutely no understanding of music. Amusia can also be developed through traumatic brain injuries or lesions and tumours on the brain. Those who once could perceive relative pitch can lose this ability through an event like a head injury in a car crash. Sometimes this condition is reversible, but there is not a way to know if the person will be able to distinguish pitches again.[13] This reason for this condition is not exactly known, but research and brain scans indicate that part of the cause may be located in the frontal cortex of the brain.[14]
References
[edit]- ^ a b D. J. Levitin (1994). "Absolute memory for musical pitch: Evidence from the production of learned melodies". Perception & Psychophysics. 56 (4): 414–423. doi:10.3758/bf03206733. PMID 7984397.
- ^ D. Huron (2006). "Exploring How Music Works Its Wonders". Cerebrum.[page needed]
- ^ "Common expressions: Levitin". Webster's Online Dictionary. Webster's. 2011-02-18. Archived from the original on 2011-07-24. Retrieved 2011-02-18.
- ^ James Martin (Summer 2004). "A Mind For Music". McGill News. pp. 1–2.
- ^ "Comparative replication studies of the "Levitin Effect" in five laboratories", KU.edoc.
- ^ Frieler, Klaus; Fischinger, Timo; Schlemmer, Kathrin; Lothwesen, Kai; Jakubowski, Kelly; Müllensiefen, Daniel (2013-09-04). "Absolute memory for pitch: A comparative replication of Levitin's 1994 study in six European labs". Musicae Scientiae. 17 (3): 334–349. doi:10.1177/1029864913493802. S2CID 8220702.
- ^ Thompson, Clive (2006-12-31). "Music of the Hemispheres (Published 2006)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-11-11.
- ^ Ferber, Dan (1998-11-09). "Sounds of Music in the Cerebellum". Science | AAAS. Retrieved 2020-11-11.
- ^ Larsson, Matz (2014-01-01). "Self-generated sounds of locomotion and ventilation and the evolution of human rhythmic abilities". Animal Cognition. 17 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10071-013-0678-z. ISSN 1435-9456. PMC 3889703. PMID 23990063.
- ^ Moulton, Calum (2014-10-01). "Perfect pitch reconsidered". Clinical Medicine. 14 (5): 517–519. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.14-5-517. ISSN 1470-2118. PMC 4951961. PMID 25301913.
- ^ McDermott, Josh H.; Lehr, Andriana J.; Oxenham, Andrew J. (December 2008). "Is Relative Pitch Specific to Pitch?". Psychological Science. 19 (12): 1263–1271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02235.x. ISSN 0956-7976. PMC 2841133. PMID 19121136.
- ^ Ayotte, Julie; Peretz, Isabelle; Hyde, Krista (2002-02-01). "Congenital amusiaA group study of adults afflicted with a music-specific disorder". Brain. 125 (2): 238–251. doi:10.1093/brain/awf028. ISSN 0006-8950. PMID 11844725.
- ^ Stewart, Lauren; von Kriegstein, Katharina; Warren, Jason D.; Griffiths, Timothy D. (2006-10-01). "Music and the brain: disorders of musical listening". Brain. 129 (10): 2533–2553. doi:10.1093/brain/awl171. ISSN 0006-8950. PMID 16845129.
- ^ Chen, Jian; Yuan, Jie (2016-07-27). "The Neural Causes of Congenital Amusia". Journal of Neuroscience. 36 (30): 7803–7804. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1500-16.2016. ISSN 0270-6474. PMC 6601881. PMID 27466325.