Jump to content

Talk:Daibutsu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 09:26, 13 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "List" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 3 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Japan}}, {{WikiProject Sculpture}}, {{WikiProject Visual arts}}. Keep 1 different rating in {{WikiProject Buddhism}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Citing sources

[edit]

I wrote my post from an information brochure I recieved when i visited the site. How should I reference this? Antleredtuna (talk) 02:40, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend reading through the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources first, but simply adding something along the lines of "<ref>Name of brochure</ref>" immediately after your text (i.e. in place of the "Fact" tag) should be sufficient. An online source would enable other editors to verify the details, but I think quoting details from a paper guide is acceptable on Wikipedia. Give us a shout if you are still unsure. --DAJF (talk) 04:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick reply Antleredtuna (talk) 13:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ranking

[edit]

The Daibutsu here were listed according to size (as the note on the list said); This was changed without much of an explanation, so I've reverted it. If there is a better arrangement for "large Buddhas" than size, please say so, and put it up for discussion. Moonraker12 (talk) 18:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It consented to the order for the ranking. However, please do not rewind it to other parts together. --663highland (talk) 10:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I don't understand. What do you mean? Moonraker12 (talk) 15:14, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please see this. You only simply rewound it. --663highland (talk) 16:12, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please pardon it when there is an impolite expression because English is not a mother tongue. --663highland (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rudyard Kipling is not important for the article on Daibutsu.--663highland (talk) 10:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, the reference to Kipling is not appropriate in the introduction. It is better where it is now.
Also, the bold letters for the daibutsu name is clearer; it looks better. Moonraker12 (talk) 18:23, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Daibutsu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:53, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]