Talk:Dracula tourism
Appearance
![]() | This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 21 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lilyloumuir. Peer reviewers: MTR34.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:16, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
stub should be merged
[edit]spinningspark- i dont understand how you accepted this as a stub.please explain. I have never seen anything that short on wiki.- I ve edited on dark tourism lately and so I ve reviewed the area a bit. this one sentence stubble should be merged with dark tourism please consider--Wuerzele (talk) 02:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Before accepting this article I did a search for sources. In my opinion, there are sufficient reliable sources discussing this topic in depth that a substantial article could written if anyone felt so inclined. There is nothing wrong with creating stubs that have the potential to be articles, it could even be said that WP:STUB encourages it, and it was on that basis that I accepted the article. I'm not even convinced that dark tourism is the same subject, that article seems to concern tourism to the sites of real tragedies whereas Dracula is essentially mythological. SpinningSpark 11:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Tourism articles
- Unknown-importance Tourism articles
- WikiProject Travel and Tourism articles
- Start-Class Romania articles
- Unknown-importance Romania articles
- All WikiProject Romania pages
- Articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/13 January 2014
- Accepted AfC submissions