Talk:Great Green Wall (China)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Great Green Wall (China) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

China Start‑class Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Climate change Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Forestry (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in China may be able to help!

On 1 May 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Three-North Shelter Forest Program to Great Green Wall (China). The result of the discussion was moved.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 March 2021 and 28 June 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rdnewgard.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:40, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

I'd like to rename the article "Three-North Shelterbelt Program" as it is used more often than "Green Great Wall" and is also a literal translation of the Chinese name of the project. Objections? Karmos (talk) 07:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MOS

Not sure on wiki official form, but shouldn't distance nomenclature have form?

"2,800 miles (4,500 km) long" & "seen 3,600 km2 (1,390 miles2) of" 98.234.94.99 (talk) 23:23, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Update needed

Much of the information currently included in this article dates to 2008/2009. What has happened since? What is the current status of the program? Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 15:39, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll update it in the next couple of months. Karmos (talk) 01:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Three-North Shelter Forest Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140315074537/http://english.forestry.gov.cn/web/article.do?action=readnew&id=201001141142307633 to http://english.forestry.gov.cn/web/article.do?action=readnew&id=201001141142307633

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:53, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Three-North Shelter Forest Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Great Green Wall which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

The first sentence of the criticism section states that "In April 2003, Western scientists argued the Chinese plan was either an inadequate solution or simply propaganda." The citation is from Wired and refers to two people, Hong Jiang (University of Wisconsin geography professor mentioned later in the paragraph) and Dee Williams (US Department of Interior anthropologist also mentioned later). My issue with this is that perhaps instead of stating "In April 2003, Western scientists argued...", the article should simply state Jiang's and Williams' criticisms. Currently, the phrasing may give a sense of a larger consensus that suddenly emerged in April of 2003, and this is not the case. 2601:5C2:201:5BB0:F9F7:9DEC:11F5:5268 (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also worth mentioning, neither source in the Wired article mentioned propaganda. This seems to be artistic license from the article's author. 2601:5C2:201:5BB0:F9F7:9DEC:11F5:5268 (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading text

Three-North Shelter Forest Program also reversed the desertification of the Gobi desert, which grew 10,000 square kilometers per year in the 1980s, but was shrinking by more than 2,000 square kilometers per year in 2022.

vs the text in the citation:

Only a few decades ago, deserts in China were growing by 10,000 square kilometers per year, according to the country's State Forestry and Grassland Administration. Today, they are shrinking by more than 2,000 square kilometers a year.

These say entirely different things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.97.13.52 (talk)