Jump to content

Talk:Betty Jane Long

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 01:50, 18 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 4 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Politics}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Women's History}}.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk13:03, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Created by DanCherek (talk). Self-nominated at 14:59, 25 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: If you're looking to further improve the article, her predecessor and successor could be added to the infobox, and a personal life section (maybe with husband, kids, non-political stuff) could be added (if you can find information for either of those). Not a problem if you can't. Earwig returned nothing, and I don't have any problems. Giving the tick with preference to ALT1, as that is mentioned in the lead and is a more shocking and counterintuitive fact at surface level. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:47, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]