Talk:Robin Warren

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Physiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the field of physiology.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Western Australia Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Robin Warren is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Discovery date question

This article says that Dr. Warren discovered Helicobacter pylori in 1979. However, the Helicobacter pylori article says that the bacterium was originally seen in 1875, first suspected to cause disease in 1899, and "rediscovered" by Dr. Marshall and Dr. Warren in 1982. I am wondering if somebody can double-check whether the 1979 date or the 1982 date is correct? 69.140.157.138 02:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warren-Florey commonalities, and how stray observations lead to seminal discoveries

I'm somewhat amused that both Robin Warren and Howard Florey have a couple of things in common. Both are from the University of Adelaide, and both owe their prizes in large part to the fact the other recipient left the the petri dish out too long. Is this a common occurence in medicine? (And they both went to the same school (Saint Peters College, Adelaide) Funkeystu (talk) 03:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC) )[reply]

Not that they left out a dish too long, which happens all the time in such laboratories, really. The point at which one is done with a plate is very subjective, and apart from it drying out, or mold forming, plates can often have very long useful lives, a matter still understood though the art of streaking (see also [1]) is in the decline in this era of kit-based micro practice.

The requisite elements of these early and continuing discoverers are, at least, that (i) their observational practices and habits of minds were such that the observation of the visual data on the plate, whatever it was, registered with them (as opposed to washing over them not to be internalized, amidst the noise of all other visual, experiential data), and in doing so, struck them as deserving further thought. In this regard, think of Prof Agassiz and his pedagogic fish (e.g., [2]). Then—not unrelatedly—a further requisite element (ii) that the moment or two of further thought given the observations somehow connected with earlier disciplined learning to create the thought of how the observation fit into establish scientific knowledge, and to suggest a practical first test to see if the perceived connection was as important as first perceived. Finally, (iii), the matter did not end with the thought, it ended with action, actual follow-up testing of the significance of the observation. Anyone familiar with scientific life, in particular laboratory research in modern times, will find it easy to see why any of this sequence of steps might be interrupted, for any given case of a stray observation. The word miraculous comes to mind, for the fact that these seminal observations were not longer missed. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 21:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have found an image here um... i dont know if it can be used link: image —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.236.138.23 (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Poor article shape based on lede

…and initial once-over, based on comparison to Barry Marshall article. Someone with training in micro should ope the 2 articles side by side, and make this as strong s the other. Apart from the biographical details, these stories run in parallel, and the two ledes (and articles should not be so demonstrably different in quality). Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]