Talk:Mariam Vattalil
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
Untitled
[edit]Made improvements,Extended article, Neutrality ensured
I have made changes to this article which i believe has brought neutrality to it.I request the authors of this article to please check them and give your feed back on my talk page,--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 03:51, 12 September 2012 (UTC) pleases inform me if there is any disagreement or dispute or any mistake regarding my edits.I would like to sincerely involve in the development of this article. --Johnyjohny294 (talk) 03:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 03:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 03:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
- Most, if not all of the edits by Johnyjohny294 were copy-pastes from material subject to copyright. This is not permitted.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 22:41, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Message me your opinion
[edit]I would like to know what the authors and developers of this article feel about my neutrality improvements of this article.--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 06:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
why reliable preferred for deletion,not unreliable
[edit]BEFORE NEGOTIATING DELETION OF this article
you should check UNRELIABLE ARTICLES LIKE Thoma of Villarvattom,which looks funny and which doesnot even exist.i would call it an article on people who never even exist.i would call Thoma of Villarvattom, a ghost article " you have to first negotiate deletion of ghost articles about people whose existence has never happened or imagined by certain people." Users of wikipedia should not show interest in deleting reliable articles --Johnyjohny294 (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 07:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
i can point out thousands of article like this--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
and moreover
L'Osservatore Romano online is not the place to search for list of servants of god.for that you have to contact vatican tribunals directly or syro malabar church. i can give you certain indian newspapers links for the same God’s own saints
i dont know whether this will satisfy you
it would be better if somebody remove that deletion tags and for your information i subscribe vatican newspapers. --Johnyjohny294 (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)--Johnyjohny294 (talk) 07:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Saints articles
- Low-importance Saints articles
- WikiProject Saints articles
- C-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- C-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Kerala articles
- Unknown-importance Kerala articles
- C-Class Kerala articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Kerala articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- C-Class Indian Christianity work group articles
- Low-importance Indian Christianity work group articles
- Indian Christianity work group articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class Women in Religion articles
- Low-importance Women in Religion articles