Talk:Salona

Illyria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illyria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illyria and Illyrians on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllyriaWikipedia:WikiProject IllyriaTemplate:WikiProject IllyriaIllyria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redundant information concerning the Porta Ceasarea

Much of the information written in the "Porta Ceasarea" section, concerning the porta is also included in the "Episcopal center" section. I do not see a reason to repeat this material. I would suggest that in the "Episcopal center" most of that information should be replaced with a simple mention of how the Porta Ceasarea relates to the Episcopal Center, including a Wikilink to the "Porta Ceasarea" section.

Also, the text in both sections includes the sentence, "After eastern and western expansion had occurred, the gate lost their primary purpose and became carrying construction of the aqueduct." In the final phrase, "gate" is singular while the pronoun, "their" is plural. I almost just changed the pronoun to "its", but fearing that I might be missing some nuance of meaning that might be inadvertently modified by that change, I point it out here. Shortsword (talk) 05:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. Actually, the Porta Ceasarea is NOT a part of the Episcopal center. It was text from an earlier article version which I moved over to the Porta Ceasarea section and forgot to delete. Also there is only one Porta Ceasarea so it should be it. The Porta Ceasarea is an important part of the site and should have its own section. --Akrasia25 (talk) 19:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]