Jump to content

Talk:Jan Fullerton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Kerry Raymond (talk | contribs) at 04:09, 19 March 2024 (top: update Australia project, replaced: WikiProject Australia | → WikiProject Australia|qld=yes|qld-importance=low|). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk10:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: My second DYK nomination

Created by Oronsay (talk). Self-nominated at 02:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: None required.

Overall: @Oronsay: Nice article. Earwig's copyvio tool returned only direct quotes which are properly attributed. Minor sourcing point above that shouldn't be too hard to resolve. Both hooks are fine though I have a slight preference for the original ALT0. Just a heads up that this will be your third DYK credit (non-self-nominations count too, per WP:DYKRULES #5, so Anna B. Eckstein is included). DanCherek (talk) 04:58, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek: Thank you. I am having internet issues but will add the missing reference as soon as I can. Regarding the DYK for Anna B. Eckstein, I am listed as a co-creator of the article, having added 3 categories and resolved a DAB. I was not the person who nominated it for DYK. Does this make a difference to the count? Oronsay (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, I just took a closer look at that article. Anyways, since Andrew Davidson listed you as a co-creator in the DYK nomination, you were credited for the DYK in the QPQ system — that is the link that reviewers check for QPQ credits. The DYK rule I linked above says If, at the time a nomination is promoted to the main page, its nominator has fewer than five DYK credits (whether or not self-nominated) then the nomination is exempt from QPQ, so even though you didn't self-nominate that one, I believe it's still counted by the system. DanCherek (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @DanCherek: for taking the time to reply. That seems rather strange. But I have no problem with the count being 3, now that I know. Oronsay (talk) 06:59, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DanCherek: Reference now added. Oronsay (talk) 01:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good to go, thanks for the interesting article! DanCherek (talk) 01:18, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]