This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This template is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
We would normally ask for evidence of consensus for any new parameters in infoboxes. Has this new parameter been discussed anywhere? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As SWinxy said, they're in infobox person as well, and I don't think it makes sense for a specialized version of that template to lack a basic field that one has. It's new to this template but not to other people infoboxes on wiki PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:07, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’m looking at the Robert Willis (hacker) page and as he has received an medal in his Infobox, I am not sure if it is appropriate to add this infobox below. His award came from his service in the Texas State Guard and there are other articles of their members without the military person infobox. If these qualify, I’d appreciate militia’s being acceptable in the documentation (the infobox documentation mentions government officials qualifying). Twillisjr (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You could use the |relations= parameter. Or you could add this line to the infobox:
|module={{infobox person |embed=yes |father=[[Winfield W. Scott Jr.]]}}
The downside to either of these is that "relations" and "parent" are displayed at the bottom below all of the military carerr details.
Alternatively, you could switch from using {{Infobox military person}} as the main infobox to using {{Infobox person}} with the |module= parameter set to display {{Infobox military person}} with all of the associated parameters unique to that infobox. The look/style of the infobox will change slightly, but this approach has the benefit of having all of the "personal" details grouped together at the top and then everything else for the military career below. — Archer1234 (t·c) 03:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rockhead126 I'm going to mark this as declined and suggest you try one of the suggestions in Archer's comment. Alternately, it may not be the case that the family relation is a defining characteristic that should be mentioned in the infobox. Keep in mind MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE: "The less information it contains, the more effectively it serves [its] purpose, allowing readers to identify key facts at a glance." (t · c) buidhe22:55, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
buidhe It seems reasonable to me to have the parameter carry over from Template:Infobox person in this case. Obviously not every parameter is relevant for the average military person, but this is a key piece of biographical information, and there are a heck of a lot of notable military figures whose parentages are undoubtedly notable characteristics. Especially considering that there are already spouse and children parameters, I'd argue that including parent parameters makes more sense than just having the information go under relations or requiring editors to embed a module. Rockhead126 (talk) 23:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]