Talk:DIII-D (tokamak)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DIII and D
Was it an upgrade to DIII ? Is the 2nd D for Divertor ? - Rod57 (talk) 14:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Coordinates
I believe the given coordinates are incorrect. I think the fusion reactor is here: 32.902251, -117.228856. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 03:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
DIII-D is not a fusion reactor.
It is a tokamak used to investigate how to best build a fusion reactor.
The page should be moved to DIII-D (tokamak). — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmiliaWiki (talk • contribs) 13:05, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
- Done. I agree with this and I've performed the move. -- AquaDTRS (talk) 00:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
Thank you EmiliaWiki (talk) 09:43, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Requested move 30 March 2024
It has been proposed in this section that DIII-D (tokamak) be renamed and moved to DIII-D. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
DIII-D (tokamak) → DIII-D – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. GZWDer (talk) 18:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Start-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- Start-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Start-Class Southern California articles
- Unknown-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Requested moves