Jump to content

Talk:Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2607:fea8:a4e5:6a00:595b:efbf:bfb4:c90d (talk) at 22:19, 6 April 2024 (→‎Weird sentence: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The mokhtar of the Dagamesh

The mokhtar of the Dagamesh clan, which sits in the north of the Gaza Strip and holds a lot of ammunition, was eliminated according to reports in the "court" of Hamas. https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/hjtejxlr6 2.55.168.155 (talk) 19:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me! 00:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I ask to memtion that "Hamas executed the Mokhtar of the Dagash clan in the north of the Gaza Strip, after it was recently reported that Israel had been in talks with the heads of clans in the Gaza Strip so that they would supervise the aid to the Gazans." I added a source. Just read. 2.55.34.23 (talk) 05:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. I've added the allegations of food theft as they also appear in the source. Alaexis¿question? 22:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent Services Access Manager FTTN

https://www.ynet.co.il/news/article/yokra13797033 It was found at tunnel 2.55.34.23 (talk) 05:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have zero trust in Israeli claims. The caption of the first image says "server room in the Hamas tunnel", with the readers lead to believe that these green boxes are servers. Well, that's a lie, these boxes are solar power inverters supplying solar power for UNRWA office.[1] I have no reason to believe in the other claims made by Ynet, which is borderline reliable anyway. — kashmīrī TALK 12:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your personal opinion is not a parameter.
Your Honor, you are relying on the MBI website which is associated with the radical left and the politician Corbyn (as written at this (https://www.buzzfeed.com/jimwaterson/the-rise-of-the-alt-left) article about the website) who tends to lie. This is a person who is pro-Hamas. UNRA itself admitted that it was not aware of what was under the building. The author of the article i attached is a well-known journalist, Ronen Bergman, who was in the tunnel under the building with the server. 2.55.34.23 (talk) 06:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, there is no contradiction that it was a dual-use compound and the military use is what is important in a military context.2.55.34.23 (talk) 06:09, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

map is mis-labelled

main wiki entry says "maximum extent of Hamas advance," but clicking the map, the actual map says "maximum extent of Palestinian advance." This is problematic language, which can lead to the false perception of collective action, and support collective punishment. 23.245.125.103 (talk) 23:27, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like you want File:October 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict.svg to be changed. Please see the existing discussion of that file at c:File talk:October 2023 Gaza−Israel conflict.svg. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hamas casualties

Reuters reported on Hamas' acknowledgement of losing 6000 fighters, it makes no sense to use the baseless Euro Med Monitor claims of <3000 instead of claims from the organization itself which has confirmed higher numbers

Hamas official based in Qatar told Reuters that the group estimated it had lost 6,000 fighters 31.154.220.91 (talk) 10:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weird sentence

""Pallywood" is often used; the term is based on an unfounded fringe conspiracy theory that Palestinians are falsifying evidence of suffering."

The article for Pallywood does not describe the term as fringe or directly as a conspiracy theory. I think that this sentence would be better worded as:

"Pallywood is often used; the term refers to a disputed allegation that Palestinians are falsifying evidence of suffering." JohnR1Roberts (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't change the fact that "pallywood" is a conspiracy theory specifically created to defame the Palestinians who point out Israeli atrocities and crimes against them. I would use the word "extremist" in lieu of "fringe" as this conspiracy theory is not "fringe" amongst pro israel people (it's basically the default for them in fact), but otherwise it is a conspiracy theory and what it alleges is totally unfounded-- that is to say, it's lying propaganda designed to attack Palestinians and try to create doubt over evidence of Israeli war crimes and atrocities against Palestinians.
Referring to it as a "disputed allegation" is like referring to the illegally occupied West Bank as "disputed" territory. 2607:FEA8:A4E5:6A00:595B:EFBF:BFB4:C90D (talk) 22:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]