Jump to content

Talk:Mary Carpenter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) at 14:51, 12 April 2024 (Fix WP Bristol param: infobox → ibox). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articleMary Carpenter has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 24, 2009Good article nomineeListed
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 3, 2017, and April 3, 2024.

Disambig

[edit]

Does this need a disambiguation note with respect to Mary Chapin Carpenter?

Done Jezhotwells (talk) 00:45, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edit

[edit]

I corrected the baptisim location and burial location and stressed the English connection. I tried to add the links to her brother and father but did not do it right. A better editor could correct this.

I also added some "See Alsos."

John R. Carpenter La Mesa, CA Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite

[edit]

I am recasting this article to follow WP:MOS and wikify links, etc. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Jarry, I thought links going to pages that are not there cause red text in the article. Red text can lower the rating of the article. If you want the red text ... okay fine. Jrcrin001 (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lower the rating of the article? Huh? Anyhow, no, in an ideal world we would not have redlinks because all possible articles would exist. But we're not there yet, nor will we ever reach that place. Red links highlight articles that should be created, and provide a handy click-and-type method for creating them, and, as such, they're an integral part of Wikipedia. As ever, we have guidelines on red links, which you can find at WP:REDLINKS. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 16:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is indeed my intention to create a Lewin's Mead article,but that willahve to wait until I am back in Bristol, circa mid-May. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know about all of the above. I'll look foward to seeing what you do for Lewin Mead. Jrcrin001 (talk) 18:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion about dates

[edit]

We currently read

'Europe and America...... between the years of 1857 and 1746.'

Clearly this is a mistake. Can someone knowledgeable about the topic please correct this? Thanks!! Grandma Roses (talk) 16:23, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mary Carpenter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]