Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 June 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rpo.castro (talk | contribs) at 18:40, 5 June 2024 (→‎Template:Infobox WEC race). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 08:46, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Now in use. Thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicit can be kept as it's found a home. Gonnym (talk) 08:08, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused simple image in a template. Even if it were used, it does not need to be in a template. Gonnym (talk) 11:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before deleting it, please see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Comparison_of_cylindrical_projections.svg . Thanks, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 12:56, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmglee you've linked to a discussion of a file on commons. That isn't related to this. The file over there isn't being nominated for deletion. Gonnym (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, my reply could have been clearer. This is the situation:
  1. Template:Comparison of Mercator projections.svg was originally used on the articles Mercator projection, Transverse Mercator projection and Oblique Mercator projection – having it as a template rather than separate thumbnails makes the caption consistent on all the articles: updating it updates all transclusions.
  2. @Justinkunimune: uploaded File:Comparison_of_cylindrical_projections.svg with the text labels changed and put them in the articles causing the template to no longer be used anywhere.
  3. In the talk page, I question whether the new SVG is better than the old, as the new labels are less descriptive.
  4. I thus request that the template be kept until the issue is settled.
Cheers, cmɢʟeeτaʟκ 21:34, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:cmglee. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 21:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

looks like a failed editing test Frietjes (talk) 23:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Broken template and module created in December 2023. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support
This was created at a time of high tensions between venezuela and guyana Lukt64 (talk) 18:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All but one are redirects to the same article. --woodensuperman 15:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary and redundant navbox. Only one link, which is already inside the main navbox. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 15:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yes. It should be noted that this is part of the story of conflating Serbian team history with Yugoslav team history. Over the years, there's been a trickle of apparently overzealous football fan edits to mash it all together. In my last iteration of editing these, I did a compromise to at least delineate them nicely; I see you just disentangled them completely now, which is probably just as valid. It doesn't seem likely that an average English reader would be surprised to see this, rather it's the other way around. --Joy (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - one blue link, simply not needed. GiantSnowman 18:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navigation template with only red links. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused election template with incorrect data as it duplicates Template:2015 Canadian federal election/Oakville North—Burlington. Gonnym (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as Raven Lord was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 07:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused rail color templates. Module:Adjacent stations/Transilien should be used instead. Gonnym (talk) 07:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 07:37, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 07:36, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after this edit. Gonnym (talk) 07:35, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 07:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Was unused in 2015 and kept and 9 years later still unused. Gonnym (talk) 07:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 07:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused infobox. Gonnym (talk) 07:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WEC races articles haven't a infobox. We have to navigate through the article to find the key information that you would expect to find in a infobox. This template was created last year, but don't know why, was never implemented. So in one way we have a need, and on the other we have the solution, only hasn't been used. If the community agree, I'll start adding this template to WEC races articles already existing. However I need to make a few adjustments before in order to fit all the categories renominations through out the years. So I would purpose to suspend this deletion let's say for a month, and after that period if I or anyone else didn't used this template in a fair amount of articles, it could be nominated again for deletion.Rpo.castro (talk) 17:01, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rpo.castro can't those articles use Template:Infobox motor race? Gonnym (talk) 08:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym Currently the Template:Infobox motor race is used in the article that covers all the races held under same designation, like in 24 Hours of Le Mans. The Template:Infobox WEC race is to be used in the article of every single edition like 2023 24 Hours of Le Mans (we have articles for each race of each season of WEC). It could be, if changes were made to Infobox motor race to include optional parameters such as winners and poles for differents categories, but I think it would make it confuse. I think having a template for the main article and one for races is a cleaner option. Rpo.castro (talk) 09:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused text mangling template that should not be used on this Wiki in any form. Gonnym (talk) 06:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 06:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused route template. Gonnym (talk) 06:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Wakanda (software) was deleted. Gonnym (talk) 06:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Wakanda (software) deleted. Gonnym (talk) 06:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was used, it got removed for some reason? Lemme check the edit history. — Félix Wolf (talk | contribs) 14:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok so it looks like the reason this became unused was because of this revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Life&diff=prev&oldid=1219059535
Not entirely sure about the change? It's a technicality issue here because there are two infoboxes there, one is referring to the Viewer software (client) and the simulator software (server). Most people would probably just call the viewer "Second Life" anyway, so I'm fine with it either way, but that might be something that needs to be discussed on the talk page.
Either way, for now, the infobox name field was changed from "Second Life Viewer" to "Second Life". I'd like to move Template:Latest stable software release/Second Life Viewer to Template:Latest stable software release/Second Life instead of having it deleted if that is alright with you. — Félix Wolf (talk | contribs) 14:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure np. If you return it to use, I'll withdraw my nomination. Gonnym (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've reverted the edit that caused the orphaning of the sub-template from the infobox and opened a discussion on the wiki page that references it here Talk:Second Life#Second Life vs Second Life Viewer. — Félix Wolf (talk | contribs) 20:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. HydraIRC deleted. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused software release version template. EMCO MSI Package Builder deleted. Gonnym (talk) 06:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]