User:John Z/drafts/Golan Heights

Discussion:

The replaced "quote" with annexation is simply not a quote, as a check of the text of SC 497 shows. The difference is legally important. Israel's Golan Heights law did NOT formally annex the Golan Heights, as the Security Council's wording also makes clear. This is often carelessly termed "annexation", but it is not. For annexation to take place Israel would have to have said formally "The Golan Heights is ours" by a law, proclamation or diplomatic notes. It has never done this. It is not a controversial point that Israel has not annexed the Golan, just a little-known one due to the prevalence of loose speaking. To quote Menachem Begin, replying in the Knesset to criticism of the "annexation": "You use the word annexation, but I am not using it.

Nor is it correct to say that East Jerusalem was annexed by Israel. Not only did Israel not formally annex East Jerusalem, it explicitly denied annexing East Jerusalem. Below is Abba Eban's official response to the Secretary General regarding a GA resolution against changing the status of Jerusalem.

"The resolution presented on 4 July by Pakistan and adopted on the same date evidently refers to measures taken by the Government of Israel on 27 June 1967. The term "annexation" used by supporters of the resolution is out of place. The measures adopted relate to the integration of Jerusalem in the administrative and municipal spheres, and furnish a legal basis for the protection of the Holy Places in Jerusalem."

http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/3389ff5a64eef486852563f80066ef6c?OpenDocument&Click=

4. Application of Israeli law to the Golan Heights is not annexation Sheleff, Leon / In: Brooklyn journal of international law; vol. 20, afl. 2, pag. 333-353 / 1994

5. Application of Israeli law to the Golan Heights is annexation Maoz, Asher / In: Brooklyn journal of international law; vol. 20, afl. 2, pag. 355-396 / 1994

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22golan+heights%22+1981+you+(annex+OR+annexation+OR+annexing)+knesset+menachem+begin&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&start=20&sa=N

JSTOR: Golan Annexation: Israeli Comment Golan Annexation: Israeli Comment. Chaim Herzog. Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 11, No. 3, 172-174. Spring, 1982. GOLAN ANNEXATION: ISRAELI COMMENT Some ... links.jstor.org/ sici?sici=0377-919X%2528198221%252911%253A3%253C172%253AGAIC%253E2.0.CO%253B2-M - Similar pages

JSTOR: The Sharon Doctrine ... O Golan Annexation: Israeli Comment. An editorial in Haaretz and an article by Chaimi Herzog both take a stand against the annexation; ... links.jstor.org/ sici?sici=0377-919X%2528198221%252911%253A3%253C167%253ATSD%253E2.0.CO%253B2-2 - Similar pages

Peace Review Publisher: Routledge, part of the Taylor & Francis Group Issue: Volume 16, Number 3 / September 2004 Pages: 285 - 292 International law, the UN and Middle Eastern conflicts Stephen Zunes

http://www.er.uqam.ca/nobel/ieim/IMG/pdf/Int_l_Law_and_the_Israeli-Pales.pdf http://www.geocities.com/alabasters_archive/settlements_and_the_law.html

December 14 : Israel adopts the Golan Heights law extending the "Israeli law, jurisdiction, and administration" to the Golan Heights. Although reported as a annexation, it is not: the Golan Heights are not declared to be Israeli territory.

December 18 : The US suspends a memorandum of strategic cooperation it signed with Israel on 30 November after Israel adopts the Golan Heights law.

http://www.jafi.org.il/education/jafi75/timeline7b.html#1

Every nation in the world?

Has every nation in the world explicitly cited its reasons for not recognizing Israel's annexation of the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem? If not, please don't put words in their mouths. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:07, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Yes See: [1]

Reaffirming once more the applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, to the occupied Syrian Golan,

Noting that Israel has refused, in violation of Article 25 of the Charter of the United Nations, to accept and carry out Security Council resolution 497 (1981),

-- Philip Baird Shearer 20:15, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

Was this a unanimous vote? Jayjg ^(talk) 20:25, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

from list of milocc page:

I've been doing other things the last few days but in answer to your question. The full set of UN Resolutions adopted by the General Assembly at its sessions can be found here http://www.un.org/documents/resga.htm

One can work out the resolution number from the codes published on the papers eg "A/RES/47/63[B]" 47 referrers to the session and 63 refers to the resolution if it is followed by a letter in brackets probably means that the resolution was voted to in sections.

In 1981 the [General Assembly 36th session] resolution 120 "Question of Palestine" was "Adopted at the 93rd plenary meeting, 10 Dec. 1981" unanimously (AFAICT) and it says:

6. Further demands that Israel should fully comply with all the resolutions of the United Nations relevant to the historic character of the Holy City of Jerusalem, in particular Security Council resolutions 476 (1980) of 30 June 1980 and 478 (1980) of August 1980, and rejects the enactment of a "basic law" by the Israel Knesset proclaiming Jerusalem as the capital of Israel;

...

Recalling the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949,

Deploring the persistence of Israel in changing the physical character, the demographic composition, the institutional structure and the status of the Holy City of Jerusalem,

1. Determines once again that all legislative and administrative measures and actions taken by Israel, the occupying Power, which have altered or purport to alter the character and status of the Holy City of Jerusalem, and, in particular, the so-called "Basic Law" on Jerusalem and the proclamation of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, are null and void and must be rescinded forthwith;[2]

The Israel Knesset annexed the Golan Heights in 1991 at the next General Assembly session was the 46th the resolution (63) condemning Israel over the declared annexation Golan Heights was Adopted by 152 to 1 with 4 abstentions: The wording was

9. Strongly condemns the imposition by Israel of its laws, jurisdiction and

administration on the occupied Syrian Golan, its annexationist policies and practices, the establishment of settlements, the confiscation of lands, the diversion of water resources and the imposition of Israeli citizenship on Syrian nationals, and declares that all these measures are null and void and constitute a violation of the rules and principles of international law relative to belligerent occupation, in particular the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949; [3]

June 20 Leifern version changed 1st sec

The Golan Heights, previously known as the Syrian Heights, are a plateau on the border of Israel, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. After capturing the area during the Six-Day War, Israel extended Israeli civil law and administation to it in 1981. Syria claims the heights part of the governorate of Al Qunaytirah, and the international community considers the area to be under Israeli miliary occupation. (See Current Status below).

Geographically, the Heights are bordered on the west by a rock escarpment that drops 1700 feet (500 m) to the Sea of Galilee and the Jordan River; on the south by the Yarmouk River; on the north by the international border with Lebanon, and on the east by a largely flat plain, called the Hauran. The Golan is usually divided into three regions: northern (between Nahals Sa'ar and Gilabon), central (between Nahals Gilabon and Dilayot), and southern (between Nahal Dilayot and the Yarmouk Valley).

Geologically, the Golan Heights are a plateau, and part of a Holocene volcanic field that extends northeast almost to Damascus. The entire area is scattered with inactive cinder cones such as Majdel Shams. Mount Hermon is in the northern Golan Heights but is geologically separate from the volcanic field. Near Hermon is a crater lake called Birkat Ram ("Ram Pool") which is fed by underground springs.

Current status

The Israeli army captured the heights and put it under military administration from 1967 until 1981, when the Knesset passed The Golan Heights Law[4], similar to its 1967 measures concerning Jerusalem. It permitted the imposition of Israeli identity cards in January 1982 on the mainly Druze Syrians who remained there and allowed them to acquire Israeli citizenship, but most objected strongly to the changes and retained their Syrian citizenship instead.[5] This measure is frequently termed an "annexation" but this is very far from clear - the word or equivalent concepts, like "extending sovereignty" are not used in the law itself.

When Prime Minister Menachem Begin was asked in the Knesset why he was risking international criticism for this annexation, he replied "You use the word annexation, but I am not using it." [6] The quasigovernmental Jewish Agency for Israel states that "Although reported as a annexation, it is not: the Golan Heights are not declared to be Israeli territory."[7] On the other hand, the Netanyahu government's Basic Policy Guidelines stated "The government views the Golan Heights as essential to the security of the state and its water resources. Retaining Israel's sovereignty over the Golan will be the basis for an arrangement with Syria."[8] Neither the UN nor any country has recognised the "annexation" and they officially consider the Heights to be Syrian territory under Israeli military occupation. This view was expressed in the unanimous resolution 497 stating that "the Israeli decision to impose its laws, jurisdiction and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan Heights is null and void and without international legal effect." It, like other relevant UN resolutions takes care to not explicitly call it an "annexation", referring at most to Israel's "annexationist policies."

Additionally, Lebanon claims a small portion of the area known as Shebaa Farms on Mount Dov in the area of Mount Hermon. Syria's official position is that the farms are Lebanese territory. UN Security Council Resolution 425 confirmed ([9]) that as of June 16 2000, Israel had completely withdrawn its forces from Lebanon, therefore indirectly designating the farms as part of the Golan, and therefore part of Syria.

UNDOF (the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force) was established in 1974 to supervise the implementation of the agreement and maintain the ceasefire with an area of separation. Currently there are more than 1000 U.N peacekeepers there trying to sustain a lasting peace. Syria and Israel still contest the ownership of the Heights but have not used overt military force since 1974. The great strategic value of the Heights both militarily and as a source of water means that a deal is uncertain.

Some Jews and Zionist organizations consider the Golan Heights to be liberated Jewish land; this view has very little support internationally. No other country has accepted the legality of the Israeli communities in the Golan Heights.

Ancient history

The area has been contested for thousands of years. During the 3rd millennium BCE the Amorites dominated and inhabited the Golan until the 2nd millennium, when the Arameans took over. Later known as Bashan, the area was contested between Kingdom of Israel (the northern of the two Jewish kingdoms existent at that time) and the Aramean kingdom from the 800s BCE. King Ahab of Israel (reigned 874–852 BCE) defeated Ben-Hadad I in the southern Golan.

In the 700s BCE the Assyrians gained control of the area, but were later replaced by the Babylonian and the Persian Empire. In the 5th century BCE, the region was settled by returning Jewish exiles from Babylonian Captivity (modern Iraq).

In the 4th century BCE, the area came under the control of Alexander the Great and remained under Hellenistic rule until captured by the Romans. In the mid 2nd century BCE, Judah Maccabee aided the local Jewish communities when they came under attack, although the area itself was not in Jewish hands.

The area was named Golan following the Roman occupation—the Greeks referred to the area as "Gaulanitis", the term used by the Romans, which led to the word "Golan". The Nabataeans gained control of the area in 85 BCE. During the First Revolt (66-73 CE) against Rome by the Jews of Judea, a number of Jews captured a hilltop at Gamla, which later fell; the hilltop is today called the "Masada of the Golan". In about 250 CE, the Ghassanids immigrated to the modern-day Golan and built their capital at Jabiyah. After the partitioning of the Roman Empire in 391 CE, the Golan Heights fell under the sphere of the Byzantine Empire, under the rule of their vassals, the Ghassanids. The area came under a short-lived Sassanid occupation that started in 614 and ended in approximately 628. In 636, the area was conquered by Muslim Arabs under the Caliph Umar I. In the 15th and 16th centuries, Druze began to settle the northern Golan and the slopes of Mount Hermon. In the 16th century, the Ottoman Turks came in control of the area and remained so until the end of World War I.

In the 1880s, a Jewish community called Ramataniya was founded by early Zionists; it failed within a year.

History since World War I

File:Majdalshams.jpg

Majdal Shams, an Arab Druze village in the Golan Heights

The boundary between the forthcoming British and French mandates was defined in broad terms by the Franco-British Boundary Agreement of December 1920. This placed most of the Golan in the French sphere. However, the joint commission formed to demarcate the border precisely did not complete its work until 1923, so the actual transfer of the Golan to French control did not occur until the year after the British Mandate of Palestine came into being. In accordance with the same process, a nearby parcel of land that included the ancient site of Dan was transferred from Syria to Palestine early in 1924. The Golan Heights thus became part of the French Mandate of Syria and, when that mandate ended in 1944, part of Syria. Syria retained control of the Golan Heights for 23 years from 1944 to 1967.

After the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli War, the Syrians fortified on the Heights, from which they shelled civilian targets in Israel and launched other attacks for the next 18 years. 140 Israelis were killed and many more were injured in these attacks from 1949 to 1967. The Mixed Armistice Commission (which oversaw the implementation of the Israel-Syria Armistice Agreement) reported violations of the agreement by both sides.

After the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli War, the Golan Heights were partly demilitarized by the Israel-Syria Armistice Agreement. Over the following years the Mixed Armistice Commission reported many violations by each side.

During the Six-Day War (1967), the IDF captured the Golan Heights on 9-10 June. The area which came under Israeli control as a result of the war is two geologically distinct areas: the Golan Heights proper (1,070 km²) and the slopes of the Mt. Hermon range (100 km²).

Before the Six-Day War the strategic heights of the Golan, which are approximately 3000 ft (1000 m) above pre-1967 Israel, were used to frequently bombard civilian Israeli farming communities far below them, although Moshe Dayan (Israeli Defense Minister during the 1967 war) would later state that it was most often the result of Israeli provocations in the demilitarized zone.

Most of the Golans' inhabitants, mainly Circassians, fled during the Six-Day War. For various political reasons, they have not been allowed to return. This has led to the splitting of many families.

Israel began settling the Golan almost immediately following the war. Kibbutz Merom Golan was founded in July 1967. By 1970 there were 12 Jewish communities on the Golan and by 2004 there were 34 settlements holding around 18,000 people.

During the Yom Kippur War in 1973, Syrian forces overran much of the southern Golan, before being pushed back by an Israeli counterattack. Israel and Syria signed a ceasefire agreement in 1974 that left the Heights in Israeli hands with a demilitarized zone in Syrian civil, but not military control.

Syria has always demanded a full Israeli withdrawal from all of the Golan Heights, to the shoreline of the Sea of Galilee (the 1949 armistice line). Successive Israeli governments have expressed support for some Israeli withdrawal from the Golan without specifying the extent of this withdrawal. In return for this withdrawal, Israel demands that the area of the Golan falling under Syrian control become demilitarized and that other security measures are implemented to prevent a potential surprise Syrian attack.

Israel has always insisted that any agreement with Syria must include fully normalized diplomatic and economic relations.

Regarding the Golan Heights, Yitzhak Rabin stated:

Words are not enough about the Golan Heights. We must put them into actions... Withdrawal from the Golan is unthinkable, even in times of peace. Anyone considering withdrawal from the Golan Heights would be abandoning Israel’s security. Let us invest, all of us together, in order to fulfil our obligations to the Golan Heights. And to you residents — those who made the Golan Heights what it is — you have all my respect.

When interviewed about an upcoming conference on American TV networkABC on September 16, 1991, Syrian president Hafez al-Assad said:

The efforts currently exerted are based on the Security Council Resolutions N° 242 and N° 338 on the basis of realizing a comprehensive peace in the region. The Golan, as an occupied Syrian territory, shall be reinstated, within the framework of such comprehensive peace, to its natural status as part of Syrian territory. Upon implementing the comprehensive solution for the two Arab and Israeli sides, comprehensive peace will prevail and documents will be achieve peace process. This as you know will be decided within the Conference, the Israeli side on the one hand and the Arab side on the other.

Also regarding the Heights, when asked about military conflict in the area, Moshe Dayan stated :

It would happen like this: We would send a tractor to plow someplace of no value, in the demilitarized zone, knowing ahead of time that the Syrians would begin to shoot. If they did not start shooting, we would tell the tractor to keep going forward, until the Syrians in the end would get nervous and start shooting. And then we would start firing artillery, and later also the airforce, and this was the way it was. I did this, and Laskov and Tzur [two previous commanders-in-chief] did it. Yitzhak Rabin did it when he was there , but it seems to me that it was Dado, more than anyone else, who enjoyed these games.

However, Dayan also noted regarding the Israeli farmers who lived at the base of the Heights:

They suffered a lot because of the Syrians. Look, as I said before, they lived in the kibbutzim, they farmed, raised children, lived and wanted to live there. The Syrians opposite them were soldiers who shot at them and they certainly did not like this. But I can tell you in absolute certainly: the delegation that came to convince Eshkol to attack the Heights did not think about these things. It thought about the land on the Heights. Listen, I am also a farmer. I'm from Nahalal, not from Tel-Aviv, and I recognize this. I saw them, and I talked to them. They did not even try to hide their greed for that soil. That's what guided them.

During US-brokered negotiations 1999-2000, Israel offered to return most of the Golan Heights to Syria in exchange for peace and full recognition. Syria refused. Syria offered full recognition and peace in exchange for a complete return to the pre 1967 borders. Israel refused.

In late 2003, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad said he was ready to revive peace talks with Israel. Peace talks were not initiated. The population of the Golan is now half Druze and half Jewish.

Communities

There are four Druze and Circassian villages on the Golan Heights in the area of Majdal Shams. Jewish communities consist of the town of Katzrin, built in the 1970s, and a number of kibbutzim and moshavim (agricultural communities).

External links

Israeli view of the Golan Heights
Syrian view of the Golan Heights
The Line of June 4, 1967 and how it came to be
Excerpts from the Moshe Dayan Memoirs

References

Leon Sheleff (1994). "Application of Israeli law to the Golan Heights is not annexation". Brooklyn journal of international law. 20, afl. 2: 333–353.

Asher Maoz (1994). "Application of Israeli law to the Golan Heights is annexation". Brooklyn journal of international law. 20, afl. 2: 355–396.