Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Paulnasca (talk | contribs) at 10:48, 3 April 2008 (→‎April 2: NATO summit should be added). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

To prevent vandalism on the Main Page, Template:In the news is protected. If you are not an Administrator and have a submission to make to that template, then please list it below.

Submissions that do not follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:In the news section on the Main Page will not be put into the live template.

Current template and archive

Kasia Niewiadoma
Kasia Niewiadoma

Archives: February-March 2005April 2005May 2005June 2005July 2005August 2005September 2005October 2005November 2005December 2005January 2006February 2006March 2006April 2006May 2006June 2006July 2006August 2006September 2006October 2006November 2006December 2006January 2007February 2007March 2007April 2007May 2007June 2007July 2007August 2007September 2007October 2007November 2007December 2007January 2008February 2008March 2008


Suggested additions

  • Check the criteria at Wikipedia:In the news section on the Main Page before making your suggestion.
  • Place new suggestions at the top under the appropriate date heading (create a new date header if necessary).
  • Remember Wikipedia is not a newspaper. There must be an existing encyclopedic article on Wikipedia regarding the subject.
  • Do not link to external news sites here. If the article has been appropriately updated it should speak for itself (Instead, consider adding those to the subject's article as references to improve the article).
  • Please use the following format for the candidate item:

Start the entry with a dot point/bullet (type an asterisk)

Add any additional comments you may have below --and sign & date your entry 12:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

The next editor has something to say about the suggestion. --They've also signed their comment 12:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Another person has continued the discussion --User's Name 12:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

And so on. When continuing the discussion please refrain from using dot points/bullets to allow the candidates to stand out from the discussion. Indent your comments for clarity.

For standard entry styles, please see WP:In the news section on the Main Page/Style.

April 2

2008 NATO Summit

In Bucharest, Romania, in 2-4 April 2008 is held the 20th NATO Summit. Because this is an very important event, I suggenst to be added into the news template on main page.


Botswana elections

Support Didn't see the election, but new head of state is obviously notable. Sorta wish we had a list of these elections every year or something so we could be thorough. Madcoverboy (talk) 22:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
We do: Electoral calendar 2008. For the past, we've got Electoral calendar 2004, Electoral calendar 2005, Electoral calendar 2006 and Electoral calendar 2007, and for next year we've got Electoral calendar 2009. AecisBrievenbus 23:26, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Is adding the capital absolutely necessary? SpencerT♦C 02:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support but remove the mention of the capital. Pruneautalk 08:42, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zimbabwean elections

Endorse with the addition of however, Mugabe refuses to leave office without a fight, or words to that effect --Hadseys ChatContribs 17:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support but election article needs to be linked and also needs cleanup. --Lemmey (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support with greater context for both presidential and parliamentarian elections. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, isn't the electoral result unclear? weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment/ Hang on There are no official presidential results yet, wait for that then bundle it with the parliamentary results and put it up. The blurb above is (as of now) simply untrue. Random89 20:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support after final election results. SpencerT♦C 02:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with Random et al, let's wait a bit longer and see what happens. The parliamentary victory is definitely significant but it's only part of the picture and it would be good if we could put the whole picture rather then saying no one knows for the rest of it Nil Einne (talk) 06:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Movement for Democratic Change one the legislature by a majority (officially) but no official word on the Presidency. gren グレン 04:31, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support provided certain modifications: I think that the parliamentary victory is noteworthy, especially considering the possibility (not certainty!) that the elections were rigged and the opposition won anyway. Thus I think that we should say something resembling:
The Movement for Democratic Change secures a majority of seats in the Zimbabwean parliamentary election, defeating current President Robert Mugabe's ZANU-PF. Results in the presidential election remain unclear. Lockesdonkey (talk) 05:13, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahern resignation

Support, although I would use the present tense "announces" instead of "has announced". Also, I wonder whether it would be better to say Taoiseach than Prime Minister. The term Taoiseach is used uniformly in Ireland, but many non-Irish people may not know the term. NoIdeaNick (talk) 11:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, using prime minister would probably cause less confusion (if it is acceptable to use this term). --Tone 11:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bertie Ahern
Bertie Ahern
Support. How about: Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern (pictured) announces his resignation, following allegations of corruption. --Camptown (talk) 11:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Yes, present tense would be better. I redirected Prime Minister to Taoiseach, but I have no preference as to which one is used. Yorkshiresky (talk) 11:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I don't like the flow of that sentence/headline. The comma gives me a feeling of stumbling. __meco (talk) 12:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about:

How about simply removing the offensive comma: Irish Prime Minister Bertie Ahern (pictured) announces his resignation following allegations of corruption. __meco (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dennisc24 (talk) 17:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lemmey (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 19:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 1

Shall we consider adding a humorous made up or humorous real event in this section just for today? DYK already has some amusing but real items. --Tone 16:14, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If its a madeup event it should include Wikipedia.
  • 'Wikipedia starts wiki-Tube: videos anyone can edit'
  • 'Wikipedia starts O'wiki-bama: change anyone can edit'

--Lemmey (talk) 16:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, what about: Wikipedia introduces a new feature, video articles and is looking for volunteers to present articles in front of the camera. Apply now! --Tone 17:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I love it. --Plasma Twa 2 (talk) 17:33, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I like it, but it might have been more useful about 15 hours ago. -CWY2190(talkcontributions) 17:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support if you want to go for it for 8 hours or so. I for one missed the plan. -Susanlesch (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Adding for a couple of hours, let's see the effect... (always possible to revert) --Tone 17:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awww...you guys should have had it throughout the day but I think its too late now. --→ Ãlways Ãhëad (talk) 03:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it stayed on the Main page for 5 minutes. BTW, I am going to archive March because none of the recent proposals does not seem to have enough support and the others are just too old now. --Tone 06:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Too old? How about the Zimbabwean elections? People are still counting the votes. --74.13.125.194 (talk) 07:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Right, missed this one... Anyway, we've already agreed that this goes on as soon as the results are known (we will see the wording then). --Tone 11:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]