User talk:Moonriddengirl

edit count | edit summary usage Welcome. To leave a message for me, please press the "new section" tab at the top of the page. Remember to sign your message with ~~~~. I attempt to keep conversations in one location—so much easier to follow them in archives down the road!—), so I will likely respond to you here (if I've already been talking to you at your page I may continue to place my comments there, if it seems necessary for context). Please watchlist this page or check back for my reply. If I think it would be helpful to you, I will leave a note at your talk page letting you know that an answer is available. If you have questions about a page I have deleted or a template message I have left on your user page, let me know civilly, and I will respond to you in the same way. I will not respond to a personal attack, except perhaps with another warning. Personal attacks are against Wikipedia policy, and those who issue them may be blocked. You may read more about my personal policies with regards to deletion here. Swedish auction Hello-I've lost my patience in the discussion of Swedish auction. What really pushed me over the edge was User:Max7437's statement, "As you can see on “Revision history of Auction” much of that article has been written by me, with few complaints." In fact, Max has been making low-quality edits throughout the auction articles which will take some serious work to recover from. The fact that people have been patient with some of his bad edits should not be used as evidence that other edits are good. I suppose it should instead be used as evidence that we should be less patient. In any case, I figured I'd blow my stack at you rather than on the deletion page in the effort to be civil. If you can help me say the above civilly, maybe I'll say it to Max. Thanks! Cretog8 (talk) 19:31, 16 June 2008 (UTC) O, yes, related. It looks like Iraqi auction suffers the same problems as Swedish auction. I was holding off nominating it for deletion until the Swedish auction debate was over. Cretog8 (talk) 19:36, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Complicated! Being civil is good. :D I'm not sure if you need to mention that in this deletion discussion, but it certainly sounds like it might need to be discussed at the article's talk page. Is this the kind of thing where drawing in assistance from some appropriate board or talk page might be useful? I'm not so terribly familiar with auctions, but based on this particular RfA would imagine there could be issues of WP:OR and WP:V. It might be a good idea to wait until this RfA closes before addressing the Iraqi auction, as a pointer to this RfA might be helpful. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Yeah, I'll wait til Swedish auction is handled. Actually, I'm surprised to find how much less annoyed I am after that tiny little vent. Thanks for putting up with it. Once Swedish auction has been handled, I'll probably go to work in the Auction talk page for that and related articles. Cretog8 (talk) 22:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Special:Contributions/Anubhah I tagged a lot of the pages this guy created for speedy deletion, then I realized how many he had created. I am not sure how to handle this. Can you look at them and see what you think? J.delanoygabsadds 22:40, 16 June 2008 (UTC) Holy smokes! At this point, I would say that stopping to talk to the creator, to explain why these articles are inappropriate, is probably the way to go. It looks like Corvus cornix might have already done that, though. The editor has not edited since that note was left and may respond to it once he returns. I think they're probably being handled appropriately. We're down to one article that is up for AfD and one PRODded (you've added the PROD since I started investigating). I think that's probably proper. If I were in your position, I'd probably leave the guy another note in support of Corvus' with a pointer to Wikipedia:Stub. I really like the way that Corvus opened his note: "Thank you for your contributions, they are greatly appreciated." This guy may be understandably upset to find his articles deleted, but if diplomatically mentored could turn out to be a valuable contributor. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:35, 16 June 2008 (UTC) I left him a note. Thanks for the advice, and thanks for answering all of the 1,000,000's of questions I keep spamming deluging asking you. J.delanoygabsadds 23:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC) It is, again, my pleasure. You're totally worth the time. :D I like the way you operate. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC) Anony's personal attack should see thisand this he's making racist comments about me, and detering just because I accuse him about sockpuppet. I only go by what Rschen7754 said. Can you warn him not to do that, becasue we should treat everyone with respect o matter what happens. These changes is not acceptable.--Freewayguy Discussions Show all changes 05:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC) That's because you harrassed me! --75.47.147.40 (talk) 05:11, 17 June 2008 (UTC) Anony is taking the fault on me because he believes I accuse him about sockpuppet, when I just go by what Rschen7754 says. He post go to hell, and F*** me because I accuse him of sockpuppet, which was not acceptable when I don't know. Thanksfor your time.--Freewayguy Discussions Show all changes 05:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC) Comment I'm not sure the background here, but personal attacks are not allowed. I've left the appropriate warning. Please don't do it again. 75.47.147.40, if you feel like you're being harassed, please view Wikipedia:Harassment for the proper steps for proceeding. You should also read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry, including the section that says, "If you have been accused incorrectly of being a sock puppet, do not take it too personally. New users are unknown quantities. Stay around a while and make good edits, and your record will speak for itself." Meanwhile, tags like this one here are inappropriate. If you want to launch an investigation of sock puppetry, you may do so; but you should not label anything as confirmed until it has been. I have removed the tags you placed here, here, here, here and here. Please do not restore them without providing a link to the sock puppetry investigation that confirmed a link. While you may find it suspicious that one of these IP addresses placed a tag in the other editor's sandbox space, it isn't in itself conclusive, and the fact that you went around tagging various IP addresses makes it seem that, for whatever reason, the harassment is in the other direction. Again, if you feel that you're being harassed, there are proper methods for handling it. Retaliation is not among them. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:59, 17 June 2008 (UTC) User:Jazz81089's personal attacks again Hi, Moonriddengirl, I come to here with the same problem with Jazz81089 (talk · contribs) again. I guess the editor does not listen to your previous advice and warning, and especially regarding WP:NPA policy. I can't bear his own gaming, doing nothing to develope the article of Blade of the Phantom Master‎, but the only thing he has done is to write personal attacks at his edit summary or accuse others at the talk page (actually the article has been edited by other neutral editors). Anyway, the guy knows very well how to make me enraged. I think a suitable action should be taken upon the user. 2008-06-17T04:50:57 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jazz81089‎ (Your gaming conduct was already recorded, read it again.) 2008-06-17T04:41:50 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jazz81089‎ (delete Caspian blue's gamings) 2008-06-17T04:40:32 (hist) (diff) User talk:Jazz81089‎ (delete. Appletrees gamings) Please take a look at this. Thanks. By the way, I changed my screen name. --Caspian blue (talk) 05:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC) Can you also take a look at another bad-faith filing by Jazz at WP:ANI#User:Caspian blue and User:Jazz81089 again? I feel very absurd on this (I was the one who got his mockeries at his edit summaries) --Caspian blue (talk) 06:01, 17 June 2008 (UTC) I have weighed in at ANI. Again, though, I urge you to please try to ignore him. I find his edit summaries there questionable, since he knows it bothers you, but I do not see them as actionable yet. If he persists or spreads it outside of his userspace, it will start to look a lot more like harassment. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:30, 17 June 2008 (UTC) The problem is Jazz's behaviors much like Japanese meat/sockpuppet offenders with off-wiki forum, 2channel who have stalked me and especially Korean editors for really long time. I filed such disruptive editors many of which has been indefinitely blocked by the filing. I think Jazz's motivation is to expose my name as many as possible as he can even though his report is contradictory, I feel like I should go over to checkuser to look at the account again since his edit numbers were not sufficient, but now then enough. --Caspian blue (talk) 13:48, 17 June 2008 (UTC) If the technical difficulty is overcome, it may be a good idea to resolve the question. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC) Use of Sound Samples Hi there, I've added a few 30 second sound samples to a couple of articles (Song to the Siren, Tim Buckley, Jeff Buckley, Dr. Dre). While i'm confident the samples do fulfil the fair use criteria i've listed them under I'm increasing suspicious that i seem to be one of very few people adding this type of media to articles. Am i doing the right thing? Does the fair use rationale seem fine to you? Does this kind of thing belong in the articles at all? I'd appreciate your thoughts! Sillyfolkboy (talk) 11:03, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Hi. :) How long are the songs? 30 seconds fits if the songs are longer than 5 minutes. If the songs are shorter than 5 minutes, the samples need to be shorter, according to Wikipedia:Music samples. It's 30 seconds or 10%, whichever is shorter. For Song to the Siren, 30 seconds is too long by a bit. 27.6 seconds is the maximum the sound clip for that should be. Another consideration: are you reducing their quality? Limiting your song samples to one sample per song recording? Placing the song samples next to conversation about them in the article? (Looks like yes on a quick glance.) Meet those conditions, and you should be doing the right thing. :) I've never added sound samples because it's never occurred to me to do so. I might have to give it some thought! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:39, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks. That's the kind of guideline i was looking for. I didn't know about the 10% rule so i'll change the length accordingly. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 12:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC) I think that's done it now: [1] [2] [3]. Thanks for the help. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 12:51, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Glad if I could help. That's a new one on me. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Sorry to butt in at the end of a conversation, but a while ago, I had uploaded a sound clip but I never did any more because I thought I would get yelled at for using so much fair-use stuff. However, it never occurred to me before now that almost every article about songs has the cover of the album or single, and all those images are used under fair use. Do you think Wikipedia would get in trouble if we uploaded a lot of sound clips as long as we obeyed the whole schpeel about quality and length? J.delanoygabsadds 13:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC) I would be inclined to go light rather than heavy--I wouldn't put in a sample for each song--but I'm naturally paranoid cautious that way. :) But I think that as long as you stay within fair use, you should be fine. For example, I might put up a sample for "Groovin' High", an article I wrote on a song yesterday. I will not add any to Groovin' High (album) because I'm not currently planning to discuss any of the songs. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Well, I was only going to do like one song, so don't worry! (I can see what you thought I was going to do..... add a sample to every article inclusive in the subcategories of this category :P ) I just really read Wikipedia:Music samples, and I am somewhat confused about where the proper place to put a sample is. In the articles you were shown by Sillyfolkboy, he put them in a "floating box". In the article where I put my sample, Tattoo (song), I put the sample in the infobox, similar to the example given at WP:Music samples. What is the distiction? I mean, how do you know whether or not to put the sample in the infobox or not? J.delanoygabsadds 13:14, 18 June 2008 (UTC) I didn't know you could put them in the infobox! I think the uses of the samples between the articles are different, it makes more sense with one sample from the single in the sparks article. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 13:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC) ←Phew. Such a relief to me to hear that! :D It seems like they could go in either place. Infobox or article body if the article is about a song; article body if it's not. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC) heh, thanks :) (You know, April 1 is only 286 days away.............) Just kidding :P J.delanoygabsadds 13:25, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Being mischievous is too much work. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC) I accidentally uploaded Image:Miley Cyrus - See You Again.ogg with an unacceptably high quality. Can you delete it as db-author so that I can re-upload a lower quality sample? The reason I would like you to delete the "image" (Why do they call every media file an image?) is because if I simply "uploaded a new version", the high quality version would still be available. J.delanoygabsadds 15:40, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Done. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:42, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks. If you want a laugh, check out the file history for the "image". (scroll down on the page) I just love copy/paste... *rolls eyes* J.delanoygabsadds 15:48, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Hey Can you check if this article is copyrighted?. I revert the author who said this article is copied from that link. To me the article is not copied from there except for some lines. Can you help?. --SkyWalker (talk) 11:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC) I'm looking into it now. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Okay. The section entitled "Field" is a direct copy from the source. That's five sentences there. The first two paragraphs of the subsequent section are copied from the source. After that, there is some effort to rewrite in that section, but there are still whole phrases that infringe on the original (For example in the original: Since 1990 it is made of carbon fiber; wikipedia: Since 1990 it has been made out of carbon fibre.) The section entitled "Play" at least starts with a copy of the source, except that numbers have been spelled out (18 becomes eighteen). It looks like substantial copyright violation exists. Blanking the article until those sections are completely rewritten seems like a good idea. In general, "copyright violation" notices are not reverted or removed until an administrator investigates them. They are listed on an administrator noticeboard. This one, as you see, is listed here. Sometimes they can backlog there, so it's not a bad idea to seek out an administrator for feedback if you think an article has been improperly blanked, but we shouldn't remove the tags until that's resolved. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks. I was wondering how can this article get B class when half of the article is copied?. --SkyWalker (talk) 05:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC) My guess would be that the rater didn't know. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:58, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Can you check this and reply if possible?. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC) arguecat4 I read the entire discussion and I removed personal info. why cant you guys give me a chance to validate any of the info???????????? I am researching her personal blog now-which is in Japanese-so it takes time for me to research it being as I am not a fluent speaker. This conversation should continue on the Administrator's Noticeboard. If you want to add information to the article, be prepared to provide reliable sources to validate it when you do. Again, given your history, there is no reason for us to make special allowances on a presumption of good faith. If you really want to contribute constructively, given that you started off vandalizing the article and admit as much, you should be more than willing to demonstrate that you intend to comply with guidelines now. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:02, 18 June 2008 (UTC) AfD stuff Thanks for your answer to my question, MoonG, which I've read more than once and which sounds very reasonable. I've been wondering about the things I said here. Maybe some of those things are valid things for the person closing a discussion to consider, and maybe some are not. What do you think? (I can't remember if I've already asked you this question – sorry if it's a repeat.) ☺ Coppertwig (talk) 00:29, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Sorry for the delay in getting back on this. I needed to read through some of the context there, as I find it difficult to give an opinion on your argument without knowing a little bit of the background. :) (Just a little bit, though; I have not even read through the whole page.) I liked what Johannes Rohr said there: "Closing down an existing project would required a clear community consensus (as opposed to a simple majority)" I'd agree with that wholeheartedly. I think that people who close discussions need to be sensitive to the gravity of the discussion in question—for example, at this point, it is easier to pass an RfA than an RfB; a higher ratio of opposes is regarded as acceptable in the former than the latter without raising questions as to whether or not consensus to promote was actually achieved. In deletion, default position is keep. (See point 4.) As to your specific note, I'm finding your question difficult to answer, as I don't think the standards of AfD can be applied to that conversation. A good many of those comments boil down to one word. In an AfD, "keep" and "delete" do not speak to policy; without some indication of reasoning (even the relatively weak "per nom", which at least means "I agree with what the nominator said") they should be discounted altogether. In an RfA, the community seems to accept "support" without further comment, but expects explanation for "delete". I keep finding myself flipping as I frame my reply between addressing whether I think your comment there was valid to that discussion, which has some of the characteristics of an AfD but also substantial core differences, or would be valid to an AfD. :) Given your header here, I presume you're talking more AfDs, and I don't really have any position to be weighing in on the specifics of a closed debate on another project anyway, so I'll go meta and address what I think is the core of the question. I agree that the closer looks at the arguments for nature and strength. One of the challenges of closing AfDs is that the process falls down as a discussion. In an actual jury trial, all evidence is collected and discussed, and then the jury retires to consider it. Everyone has a chance to voice his or her opinion, and the "vote" is taken only after everyone has done so. In an AfD, juror A might make his !vote on day 1 and never look back (he should, but many evidently don't). On day 3, Juror F comes along and makes a brilliant counter-argument, but juror A never gets to see it. If Jurors A-E don't respond, we can't know if they would have been influenced by that argument. In that case, a closer should take into account the impact that Juror F's argument had on all subsequent jurors and conceivably weight those more heavily than the !votes that came before. The input of subsequent jurors helps to be sure that we aren't allowing ourselves (as closers) to admit our own bias to the project. After all, just because we think Juror F's argument was brilliant, it doesn't necessarily follow that everyone else will agree. Sometimes Jurors G, H, I & J will give it the raspberry, and perhaps Juror K will even point out the big old flaw that Juror F (and we, the closer) missed. (This is, of course, assuming that all arguments are equally within policy and the debate hinges on finer points of it--say as to whether the only six sources to be found on a topic constitute widespread and/or substantial coverage or not.) But what happens if Juror F is the last responder? Unless Juror F pointed out a serious policy issue, I would be unlikely to overturn the default position (keep in AfD) on the strength of one argument. (I just wanted to be clear that obviously none of this applies if what Juror F points out is a trump card--as in, "Delete. The article is great. It was great when I first read in the New York Times, too. It's a copyvio." You know that, but talkstalkers may not. :)) If Juror F is the last responder and I felt that Juror F's position might influence others, I might relist. Or I would myself become Juror G. (Another substantial variation from the courtroom set up: the "judge" has the opportunity to recuse herself from hearing the case and instead become a juror.) As a closer, I would look at the lack of response to debate in determining the validity of the original argument. Its impact on the outcome might be determined by whether others have taken on the task of responding. (Example: "Juror A says non-notable because." "Juror B says Juror A is wrong because." "Juror C says I agree with Juror A because." The fact that Juror A didn't respond doesn't mean Juror B is right; Juror C has effectively responded on his behalf.) It would also depend on whether the point/question being ignored is a statement of differing opinion merely or has a firmer grounding in policy/logic. If Juror A says, "There's only one source that says this matters" and Juror B says, "True, but that single source is The Definitive Oxford Guide to This Subject" I'd give more weight to Juror B. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:12, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Re:Removing hangon tags from articles Thanks. Iam aware of the rules. --SkyWalker (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Good. Removing valid content, including tags, is generally regarded as a bad idea. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC) There is no valid content Moon. That user also had removed a previous db tag. Here go and browse the site [4]. Happy browsing. :). --SkyWalker (talk) 11:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC) It doesn't matter if there is no valid content or if the user had previously removed a db tag. The reason we don't indefinitely block people after their first vandalism edit is that there is a chance that they might decide to stop vandalizing. There is a chance that this creator might have been operating in good faith, and allowing him to follow process doesn't stop process from working. If his "hangon" was not persuasive or forthcoming, then the article would have been deleted anyway, and we wouldn't be in the position of leaving somebody a note telling them to put a "hangon" tag on the article and then removing the "hangon" when they do. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Ok fine. So restore the article and let him do whatever he wants. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC) I do believe you are missing the point. If I thought the deletion was inappropriate, I would have brought that up with the admin who deleted it. I was on the verge of deleting it myself. The point is not that the article should remain, but that you should not obstruct the processes put in place. You yourself left the notice for the creator (and good for you; those are important) telling him how to contest the speedy deletion. He might reasonably take issue with you then blocking him from following the instructions that you left him. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Iam short temper sometimes or many time but i do understand your points. For instance when i have created some articles and went on to improve it. The next min i see a db tag and after few milli seconds the article is gone. Do you know how angry i was?. I started to hate some of the wikipedia admins and still do. Atleast there are few admins here i like :P. Anyways Moonridden i do understand what you have said and i wont do it again. --SkyWalker (talk) 12:20, 20 June 2008 (UTC) I can imagine how frustrating that is. When I'm working on an article, I always put an {{inuse}} tag on it so that other editors know I'm not finished. This is also supposed to eliminate edit conflicts. It doesn't always, but I think it probably does help. I suspect that the admins who deleted your articles didn't mean it personally, though I'm sure it must feel that way. :/ Anyway, thanks. While I wind up deleting quite a lot of articles on Wikipedia, I think it's important that we be as fair as we can be to creators so that others don't wind up feeling the way that you did. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:34, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks :). Here is the cookie.--SkyWalker (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Shell3395 Tell this guy he's been blocked. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC) I was in the process of looking for the best template to do so. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Thanks ...for this note on ANI.[5] I'm flattered! :) BrownHornet21 (talk) 13:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC) You earned it. Difficult role you've undertaken. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Coyote Point Systems: Delete? Hi Moonriddengirl, Thanks for your thoughtful comments on the Coyote point systems talk page. In the interest of full disclosure, I should let you know that I am associated with this company (I'm the founder). I don't think that that should immediately disqualify me from creating an article. Someone needs to "prime the pump" by creating the page, and then (hopefully) the community will fill in by updating and maintaining the page. There was a useful pointer from Kevin to the WP:CORP page, and I'll make sure I add some more independent sources to the page. In general, I do think that this company is notable for being a pioneer in bringing what has generally been a very high-end (i.e. expensive) technology (Application Traffic Management/Load Balancing) to the mid-market, which has resulted in better internet infrastructure for organizations with limited budgets! Additionally, as I tried to indicate in the article, Coyote is a pioneer company in this particular technology space. We're mentioned in a number of other pages, such as load balancing and f5 Networks. I'm pretty sure that nobody from Coyote added those citations. Anyhow, I will endeavor to improve the notability aspects of this page, and hope that it remains in place. Coyotekish (talk) 19:30, 20 June 2008 (UTC) Deletion of Perfect manners Hello, I saw you deleted the article I wrote about that book, I couldn't follow the hole discussion because I couldn't get connected to the Internet for a good while. Is that article completely deleted or would you be able to post it to me so I can improve it without starting from the beginning? Would you give some advice to avoid other deletion proposal for I must confess I could not understand why was Perfect manners considered uncontested. Thanks in advance --Munifico (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Hi. The article was deleted following a "proposed deletion", which is only for uncontroversial deletions. It was uncontested because nobody removed the prod tag. However, it is standard practice to restore PRODded articles if they are requested back, so I have gone on ahead and restored this one. The guideline you'll want to read here is Wikipedia:Notability (books), which explains the criteria for establishing book articles on Wikipedia. You'll want to use reliable sources to verify how your article meets the guidelines. This will help you to avoid a deletion discussion on the article. Good luck with it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC) One thing I should mention: this is probably something you should attend to soon. It is also standard practice to notify the proposer of deletion that the article has been restored, and he or she may choose to proceed with a deletion debate now that the deletion has been challenged. I have tagged the article for {{notability}} concerns. Feel free to remove that tag once secondary sources have been provided to verify that it meets the guidelines linked above. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:57, 21 June 2008 (UTC) Hi. Thanks for the information. I probably will take it to AfD, but I'll give the editor a couple of days to provide notability/sources before I review it again - it only seems fair, especially if they've got problems with internet access. :-) CultureDrone (talk) 09:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Image:David Cargo1.jpg and You took care for Image:David Cargo1.jpg: 12:37, 22 June 2008 Moonriddengirl deleted "Image:David Cargo1.jpg" ‎ (Copyright. Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2008 May 20/Images) Would you mind doing the same to: Image:Jerry Apodaca1.jpg‎; - For the same reason: State of New Mexico public office buildings:This is photo taken of a photo hanging on the wall taken by another, professional photographer: copyrighted work. Thanks, ~ WikiDon (talk) 18:14, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Certainly. It's done. Thanks for catching those! --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:22, 22 June 2008 (UTC) Found another one: Image:Clyde Tingley1.jpg Should I report it? ~ WikiDon (talk) 09:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC) DYK On 22 June, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Groovin' High, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. Vishnava talk 18:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC) COI I write because of your prior response to the BLPN post I submitted regarding Dicklyon's violations of BLP and 3RR at Archives of Sexual Behavior. He is now accusing me of violating COI in part because of that, so it seemed appropriate to notify you. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#MarionTheLibrarian. —MarionTheLibrarian (talk) 01:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)