User talk:NiciVampireHeart

New sections go at the bottom, be civil, sign your posts, and think before you type, but other than that, caint liom, mo chairde! -- ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ Inactive sections will be archived after 20 days If you're bored, you can sign my autograph book!

Jeff Hardy

Hey Nici, what's up? Listen, what would you think if this image of Jeff Hardy, was the main image in the article? Would it be cool with you or... -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very glad you liked the image. I'm very cool with the author of the image, hence why Randy Orton and Shawn Michaels got their main pics, and I told him that I would have a discussion with some people about the Jeff Hardy image, and since you like the image, I'll ask him permission so that the image can be used in his article. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:02, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw his picture of Jeff Hardy and I thought that would be a good image, but I thought it would be a good idea first to discuss it, you know. Until he gives the green light (permission), I'll upload the image and let you add the new picture to his article. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:56, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cool. Again, I'm glad that you like it... you Jeff Hardy fan. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:02, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, why would I? Its just a request, no harm has been done. ;) Actually, the user says its fine that we use his images on Wikipedia. So, I'll ask him permission for those two images and we'll see what goes from there. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:14, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No its no bother at all. Also, you're just in luck, he gave the permission for the Jeff Hardy picture. Alright, I'll upload it at commons, give you filename, and let you do the honors in Jeff's page. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't feel right; I would rather let you do it. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure. Also, I've asked permission for the Natalya and Shane McMahon images, just need his approval. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What Batman said in The Dark Knight, you don't need to thank me. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jeff Hardy SmackDown November 2008.jpg. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:03, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I got permission for both images, I'll upload them soon. Hey, I want your opinion on something. The user just suggested that I upload this image of the Undertaker. Do you think it might be a good image, meaning "main" image? P.S. I wanted to surprise you with this image, but the author of this image sadly doesn't have a contact link, so I can't get the image. :( -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's what I thought on the 'Taker image, I guess I'll have a talk with him. Maybe it can be put in a section or something. Also, he has offered to give permission on this image of Triple H, which is great, IMO. Totally, on the images of Shane and Natalya. Oh, I checked the user's contact (again) and he re-added his contact link, sent him a message regarding his pic of Jeff as WWE champ, so let's just see. Let's pray on this one. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Totally. Is the image of Jeff alright? Cause, I had a bit of trouble in cropping it and I want your opinion on it, if its good or not. Yeah, when I saw his WWE album, I was blown away, impressive skills. Oh, you should see his non-wrestling pics, impressive as well. Yeah, I'm crossing my fingers as well. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, just want to make sure. Is there any other picture(s) that you would like to see? The author of the Randy, HBK, and Jeff images. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are going to love me FOREVER. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know you do. I've uploaded the image and well I don't know where it would belong, so here ---> Image:Jeff Hardy WWE Champion Royal Rumble.jpg, another honor. Alright, I'll leave a message for Funaki, Layla, and Tazz. Its fine, he asked me to ask you guys, so its fine. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:06, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar, I really appreciate it, especially coming from you. ;) Nah, I won't move it, if I didn't know where it should go, then it wouldn't help if I moved it. In a while, I'll upload Shane, Natalya, and Triple H. Again, thanks for the barnstar. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:18, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, like I said, its no bother at all. I'm just trying to help the wrestling articles with excellent images. ;) I sent him the request of Funaki, Layla, and Tazz, let's see what he says. Thank you for the congrats, I appreciate it. I must confess that I'm done with writing PPV's, forever. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, its take too much out of you when researching for the feuds and writing the event. Its too much. Also, it drove me to the point where I had a hatred in writing them. Oh, I totally feel ya, bios are much easier to work on, then PPV's. Yeah, actor articles are better to research for, IMO. If you wanna help me out on working on a specific actor/actress, it would be an awesome collaboration. :P Thank you, I appreciate the congrats on her article. Also, you did help me out, during its FAC, with that sentence about her waitressing and stuff, again thanks for the sentence. Well, you and I had this deal that we would work on MVP's article, but we never got to it. Do you want to maybe get to it? Or another article. Before I forget, I give you props on fixing Hardcore Holly's article, its nicely written. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:48, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome, look forward with working with ya tomorrow. Goodnight. P.S. Don't let the bed bugs bite. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:33, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So what section of MVP's article do you want to work on? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind and thank you for the compliment. ;) Also, I'm going slow on this, but I've uploaded the Shane and Triple H images. Later, I'll upload Natalya and Layla's images. Then later, I'll upload the rest of the images. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup yup. Though, its a shame what happened to Shane last night. Bastard. Anyways, that's great, who knows we might get to submit to GAN today. :) Alright, I'll get to working in the lead, after I'm done, I'll have you check it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if punting people is entertaining. Maybe to you, but not me. ;) Anyways, I'll drop a note when I'm done. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I guess if you favor the "storyline". :) Wait, how 'bout HBK? Was he not entertaining last night? He was to me. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:54, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, what would Jeff Hardy think of all this? Nici being entertained by a "bad boy". Joking aside, for the lead, do I use his ringname "MVP", ex: "MVP has wrestled for numerous promotions in his career" or his non-ringname, ---> "Burke has wrestled for numerous promotions in his career"? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:01, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess. But, who's the one that is totally "bad"? *cough* Orton *cough* Alright, I'll do that for his name and stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Man, you just hatin' on Cena. ;) That's not true; before Kennedy when all soft, he was one of my favorite heels. Same thing with Orton, before he started punting people, he was one of my favorite, or should I say hot heel. Here's a good one; the Brian Kendrick, he's fantastic. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:34, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See, I told you I have that "bad" side of me, too. Anyways, yeah its cool, I understand your boyfriend is more important, I know. :) The lead, do you want me to add all the promotions he was in before coming to WWE? Um, I'll try to find a date for DSW. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cool. I just wondering that's why. Alright, I'll fix it and drop you a line. Finally, after a year, or so, we finally work on MVP's article. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I totally feel ya. Hey, what should our next project be? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:36, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, no one can't resist saying that. Great choice, btw. Alright, after I'm done with fixing the lead, do you want to nominate it? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:46, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, when its set and done with. :) Alright, I think I got it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:58, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind if I archive his talkpage? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, two months. :P Hey, at least we have some time to fix it here and there. :) Alright, you want to do the same for Kennedy's? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:08, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bye. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you still want to aim for a GT? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine with me, I mean we are working on the projects that we want to do, so. I'll work on the leads for Morrison and the tag team page. Do you think you can handle fixing the info. in the articles? Also, reason I bring this up, the IP from Miz's page was blocked, so, no more interfering with the grammar changes and stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I know what you mean. ;) Alright, I'll do Morrison's lead first, then check in with you. Cool? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I'm in class right now, so I'm multi-tasking with Kennedy's article and class work. Also, I finished the lead for Morrison, can I have your thoughts. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:51, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, harsh criticism. :P Alright, I'll get to working on the stuff. Um, for the last bit, I think it works either way with "making" or "marking". But, I'll add your suggestion. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:04, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha.... ha. I guess. Alright, after I'm done fixing it, I'll see which sentence makes sense with it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it; tell me if it works or not. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:34, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment. :) Do you want me to add it to the article? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Hey, I was gonna tell you that I was reading through Morrison's article and there are a lot of POV stuff in there, you know. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:01, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted let you know, so. Yeah, I'll do it right now. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. After you're done with Morrison's article, can you do the same for Kennedy's? After its done. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:40, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cool and thank you in advance. P.S. I finished the lead for Mr. Kennedy, again, can I get some criticism. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the copy-edit, I appreciate it. I'll get to fixing the lead info. for Kennedy. Yeah, the Miz's article is ready for nomination. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome; you ask, I deliver. :) I hope I didn't mess anything up. If I did, I'm sorry. Also, sorry I didn't log in yesterday, I was really busy at work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:09, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hell yeah, we do!!! Okay, thank God. Oh, I thought you probably did. I was panicking a bit with letting you down. But, if you didn't log in, then I'm calming down a bit. :) Alright, after I'm done with fixing the lead info., would Kennedy's article be ready for GA? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool if we both feel the same way. Alright, give me a couple of minutes, I'll fix the lead and then nominate it. Alright, three down (MVP, The Miz, and Kennedy), two more to go (Morrison and tag team). ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:19, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We sure are. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:26, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I gotta tell ya, coming up with a lead for a tag team is hard. But, I managed to write something up. Can I have your thoughts? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I feel your pain on that. ;) Have you thought of maybe checking out PW Torch or WrestleView for the results? Just a suggestion. Like above, I will work on the info. and check back with you. Yeah, the article is short and won't be that much of a problem. Hey, can you do a check on it afterwards? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I feel you on that, as well. :P Yup, you got it. Just drop me a note and I'll check it out. Um, I'm not sure about the spelling, but I got it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, we'll after you're done with Morrison's article, can you do the check, after you're done, don't want to stress you out between articles. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:14, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oakey dokey. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:55, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, just tell me when you're done with Morrison and I'll get to it. Oh, yeah I totally remember that. Their feud over the ECW title. I'll look up at some info. and add it, thanks for the notice. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yup. How should I start the sentence, though? Maybe ---> "Before they formed a partnership, Morrison and the Miz were once opponents, competing for the ECW Championship"? Again, I'm still new with working on tag teams. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:00, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added bit -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice. Now, is it ready? Thank you for the congrats, 'preciate it. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, cool. How's Morrison's article coming along? Do you need help? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I totally feel you on that. Yeah, I'll check out the article and see what's "missing" and let you know. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the stuff I found ---> In the Bischoff's assistant and apprentice section, "to drive the point home he began using the Nitro theme music as his ring entrance music", this is me, but shouldn't "music" be mentioned just once? In the MNM section, this sentence ---> "They held the titles for three months, having successful titles defenses against the teams Mysterio and Guerrero and Hardcore Holly and Charlie Haas", I feel that there's something missing between teams and Mysterio, again this is me, I may be wrong. That's it, I think the article is good to go. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Like you said, now we wait [for two months] for the articles to get reviewed. I'm proud that we actually got this done and stuff. This is probably our new year's resolution, in getting work done. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:06, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We sure did. I do the same, because I'm required too. :) Heads up, I fixed the dead links for Unforgiven '06. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the message you left at PW and I noticed that Unforgiven was listed, since I did expand it, I thought it was my duty to fix the dead refs. Also, I wound up fixing some dead refs. as well for other PPV's. I'll still continue with fixing them. Heads up, the stuff from WWE.com for Unforgiven '07, the results and stuff, have been deleted or something, cause the only result(s) there is the 'Taker and Mark Henry match. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:46, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Yeah, SumemrSlam '07, Unforgiven '07, and No Mercy '07 all have dead links, because of the events going and happening at Unforgiven, so. I'll still continue with fixing dead links for PPV's. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:11, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re about jackass

I could tell you all my emotions but this page would be too long afterwards. I'll tell you in a reply to the e-mail. I just want you to see Abyss' sick promo. I've never loved tacks and glass more than at that moment. Good luck with Bob Holly.--WillC 23:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It might not be an amazing rant. I was expecting it so I'm not too pissed today. But it will be anti-Triple Cocksucker and Pro-Cena and Edge.--WillC 01:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wait for the rant that will come when JBL or HBK ends Taker's streak.--WillC 19:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone had too it should be Kane. No one else, because HBK has already been given alot of shit, he doesn't deserve to beat Taker's streak in my opinion.--WillC 16:29, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but look at Kane. He has tried twice before and lost. Kane is Taker's half-brother. It would make sense to have his kayfabe brother finally beat him, even when Taker said if he wanted anyone to end the streak it would be Kane.--WillC 19:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That can always change by next year. He just needs to be booked right.--WillC 21:54, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I wish Jacobs owned the Kane gimmick so he could go to another promotion and actually get a deserved push.--WillC 00:12, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking more about Ring of Honor. They know how to push their talent. TNA has lost their way.--WillC 01:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More of a way too show that TNA lost their way from 05. 05 was their best year yet and have since gone downhill. They had nothing bad in 05. All their events were great. Just buy their Ultimate matches DVD, most of the matches are 04 to 06 era. Probably three at most from 07 to 08. I believe their is one Ultimate X match from 07 on there, as well as the 07 and 08 King of the Mountain matches. The DVD is 7 hours long with interviews and rules to each of the matches. Unbreable had their only 5 star match which is a must watch. Compared to all the matches TNA and WWE put on in 08, this one match was better than all of them. Bound for Glory was out of this world. Monster's Ball, the Iron Man match, the Ultimate X match, and the ending of the event were just great. I don't believe there was one bad match on the event. Many people have rated it a 9 out of ten.--WillC 01:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To know what I mean watch this: [1]--WillC 02:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I love the match just for the spot, in which Daniels flings AJ into Joe and AJ performs a hurricanrana. I mark out everytime I see that.--WillC 20:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should watch most of the Ultimate X matches then. Namely the bout at Final Resolution (2005). That thing is insane. Or the Ultimate X Challenge match at Destination X (2005). That is probably my favorite Ultimate X of all time.--WillC 20:25, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Final Resolution bout is going to be easy to find. The DX bout I only watched because I got the Ultimate matches DVD. No bad matches on that entire DVD.--WillC 20:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It should be over there by now. It was released, I believe, in October. There is no match list on the DVD, so I'll tell you here. They begin with a few King of the Mountain matches, the 06 from Slammiversary (2006), the 2007 one from Slammiversary (2007), and the 2008 one from Slammiversary (2008). Then Ultimate X: the bout from Final Resolution (2005), the Destination X bout, the No Surrender (2006) bout for the Tag team belts, and the only one and first one to date to have them on the line, between Styles/Daniels and LAX. Another Ultimate X match is from Victory Road (2007) and is, the first ever and only one to date, Gauntlet Ultimate X match and has the Elevation X support instead of the ropes. They finish the first DVD with the Bound for Glory (2007) Ultimate X match. All those matches are great. The second DVD has Six Sides of Steel cage matches, Monster's Ball, Full Metal Mayhem, and a Ladder match. The cage matches are from Turning Point (2004), Lockdown (2005), and Lockdown (2006). The TP bout is the main event between AMW and XXX, in what is a bloody and just insane match. Just because of Elix Skipper's hurricanrana from the top of the cage. Then there is A.J. vs Abyss. If you love tacks and chairs, you'll love this match. The final one is for the NWA Title between Christian Cage and Abyss. Like before, if you love tacks, you'll love this match. Also hope you like chains, because there is a little surprise with one at the end of the match. Full Metal Mayhem is next, with a bout from Against All Odds (2005) between your favorite, Jeff Hardy, and yes, again, Abyss. Great match for the time given and made this match something in TNA. It was the debut of the match and only two have taken place since. Then another Full Metal Mayhem, and guess who is in this one. Abyss and Christian Cage for the NWA Title at Sacrifice (2006). Again tacks are involved. Now probably one of the best gimmick matches ever, the monster's ball. The 2005 and 06 bouts are included. They are from Bound for Glory (2005) and Bound for Glory (2006). They are amazing. Abyss is included in both so guess what, tacks are involved. Now the last match is a Ladder match between Christian Cage and Kaz from Genesis (2007). Amazing match. The entire DVD is worth the 20 bucks. You would be insane to not buy this DVD.--WillC 21:24, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.--WillC 22:33, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Jeff Hardy image.

Yeah...even though he lost, you might want to put this image instead. ;) How's your "studying" going? Simon^KSK 01:08, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. It seems kinda wrong when you put a caption saying "Best WWE Champion," and he's wearing a Intercontinental title. Eh, whatever. So, how are are you doing. we haven't talked for a while. Simon^KSK 01:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ric Flair

The title was just called the WWF Championship, not the WWF World Heavyweight Championship (although back when they were the WWF they would say the full name, like "World Wrestling Federation Championship" instead of just "WWF Championship"). TJ Spyke 05:53, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1998 is when they began calling it only that. Before that they would use both names (although they would rarely use the long name, I barely remember them ever using the full long name). TJ Spyke 15:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Alumni Page

Could you please, please, PLEASE, come back to the WWE alumni page! Moe changed everything that you did to the page, he published an unfinished wikitable and there is maybe half of the information on the page total. He deletes most of the comments made about the quality of the page. Your way was much better. I'm not saying this because I don't like change or anything. I'm saying this because I'm purely concerned about the quality of the article. Also, I'm new to this whole thing do you know how I could report him? Jcm431 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Hey there, hope you could help me with something.

What would be considered reliable sources for wrestling articles? Nithas (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Maryse

Please do not revert edits saying that Maryse attacked Melina, that is a notable event and is the start of a fued. It doesn't matter, because it's not a week by week event. Josephjames21 (talk) 15:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a feud that will happen I'm sorry but you can revert it if it's notable, Giving a DDT to the Women's Champion is pretty notable. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah still, that's a notable event, and she appeared on a different brand, that's quite notable! Josephjames21 (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean it like that, this makes you look bad. I mean't Since I already know your opinion, I wanted to other people's opinions. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah well I asked you not to give your opinion, and I didn't give mine. So it makes you look bad, and that it is a notable event it makes you look bad. Josephjames21 (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know you wanted to express your opinion, but I wanted a second opinon by someone who didn't know our opinion's. So I asked you not to express your opinion, as I didn't express mine. Josephjames21 (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Subpage

Hi! You're probably the only user I've noticed so I'd like to ask you - how do I create a subpage to make an article on Leire Martínez? You can check th Spanish and French wikipedias to comprove her existingness. Thanks--Falegas (talk) 16:36, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot!--Falegas (talk) 16:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Burchills

Yeah, I'll release the image for you. Mshake3 (talk) 17:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Hardy Boyz

Template:Hardy Boyz has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. ^BlackManta 19:53, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I thought I had put in my reason, i've added it in now. ^BlackManta 11:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fix WM25

Tell them to fix WM25 saying that its the 25 WM not the 24 Supermike^KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WM20 was really WM19 to you guys and WM1 was really WM0 to you people as well You know this is why you guys get in so much trouble Supermike^KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are you guys are basically saying WM25 is WM24 which is not true its WM25 its been 25 since of WM25 of the event —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike (talk • contribs) 15:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See your porblem is your going by what Wikipedia is saying well its wrong WM25 mark 25 year of Wrestlemaina do rearch and go to WWE.com and guess what Im right It common sense I am its like saying your not 17 year old your really 16 because you birthday on a different day every year but that does not matter your still 17 rather it be on sunday or monday just like WM25 still 25 year of WM rather it be in March or April Supermike^KSK 20:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LOOK! IT 25 WM ITS BEEN 25 YEAR OF THE EVENT 24 YEAR WAS LAST YEAR ITS NOT THAT HARD TO UNDERSTAND WHY ARE YOU BEING SO STUIPD THERE NOTHING 24 ABOUT THIS WM ITS ALL 25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Supermike (talk • contribs) 15:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheezburgr

Pavlen666 haz givn u Cheezburgr! Cheezburgrs promot WikiLovez and hoapfuly thiz one haz made yore day bettr. Spreadd teh WikiLovez by givin sumone else Cheezburgr, whethr it be sumeone youz hav had disagreementz with in teh past or a gud frend. Hapy munchins!

Spredd teh goudnesz of Cheezburgerz to all lolcat buddiez by addin {{subst:Cheezburgr}} to their talk puj with friendly messuj to all.

Bob Holly

I did a GA review on the article, and it's very close to passing. I left a few comments. There is some bad weather (rain/sleet/heavy snow) expected to come into my area for the next 48 hours, so I'll probably lose my Wi-Fi internet access to the tower a few km away. If you finish the article soon, I might not have internet access to be able to pass the article until Monday U.S time. Royalbroil 13:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please let me know when you're done. I bet it'll take you just a few minutes. My internet is working right now and I hope to be on Wiki for about another hour. 13:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for all of your hard work on the article! I'll often review a professional wrestling article when I nom something I worked on. Most reviewers won't touch the topic. I don't mind reviewing them - I know the basics of wrestlers from the 1980s. I don't have enough knowledge, or the inclination, to work much on these articles. Cheers and congratulations on the green plus! Royalbroil 13:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MVP GA Review

I just wanted to let you know that I've done the Montel Vontavious Porter review and put it on hold with a list of comments on the talk page. Just so that you know. MPJ-DK (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nici, you're right about Wreslemania 25 not being the 25th anniversary. If people can not understand this, you're wasting your time trying to explain it to them. Certainly, it's not hard enough for you or I to understand (: 24.160.145.53 (talk) 06:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Face vs Fan Favorite

The term "Fan Favorite" implies popularity rather than their moral compass. Face is a much more accepted term, and I am setting the article back to say "face"

"It is often helpful to wikilink terms not obvious to most readers; sometimes links to Wiktionary may serve the reader as well as links to Wikipedia articles. Pay particular attention to terms for which the technical meaning is different from the commonly understood meaning"