User talk:GoodDay

Welcome!

Hello, GoodDay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

---

SEMI-RETIRED

This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.

Hello to all fellow Wikipedians. Be assured I'll be as curtious as possible & hope to provide worthy answers to your questions (about wiki edits), I'm looking forward to meeting you. User:GoodDay 22:40, 17 November 2005 (UTC).

Alternate Captains

I haven't been paying to much attention to other teams' alternate captains so I wasn't aware that the Wild had permanent alternates. Cheers Raul17 (talk)

I'm not moving on, gang

If ever there was a Wikipedia addict? it's me. Unfortunately, that addiction has angered my body, which has responded by giving me my third case of hemorrhoids in 18-months. I'm moving into semi-retirement as of today & retirement at the end of this month. From now until 'mid-night' 1 March 2009, I'll be on Wikipedia for 'bout an hour daily. I'll have a swong-song message, at the end of the month. GoodDay (talk) 16:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Think long and hard beore you make your decision GoodDay. If you do decide to leave you should make it a break rather than retirement. Give it a month or so and see how you feel. Jack forbes (talk) 16:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

If in future, I get a laptop, then I'll return full time. Right now, sitting for hours in a chair daily, is becoming a pain in the 'you know whatsy' (ha ha). I'm content with the fact, that I'm semi-retiring in a happy (though painful) mood. GoodDay (talk) 16:47, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

See ya'll tomorrow (for 'bout an hour). GoodDay (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Man, that's hosed. I agree with Jack, just take a break. What will we do without you here? Come on think about it. Don't leave. Take a break, then get a laptop. Come on, GoodDay, you're one of the best editors here at Wikipedia.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Take a break, buy a laptop and a cushion and comeback (and take the procedure its not as bad as people say) --Snowded (talk) 06:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help and encouragement. As you know, you were one of the first people to show me the ropes. As you can see, you'll be missed by many. I'd be really happy if you decide to get a laptop instead, they're dirt cheap nowadays... ;) --Cameron* 10:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to request our distinguished colleague GoodDay to take a brake and to purchase a laptop. (Without objection, so ordered.) :-) Cassandro (talk) 11:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your many positive contributions, you'll be missed. I hope you do decide to return shortly, and wish you a swift recovery from the 'rhoids. Best wishes, waggers (talk) 13:12, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I hope you do get the laptop and come back on regularly again, you will be very missed if you dont. Hope you feel better soon and always stay safe. BritishWatcher (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Montjoie! St. Denis! To arms! Mon bel chevalier, pray not desert the battlefield. The Battle of Agincourt cannot be fought without you. Charles d'Albret needs you by his side against the vanguard of Harry's rampant greyhounds.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Sniff sniff. Wowsers, ya'll are certainly a persuasive group. Well, alright then, I won't retire. But, I'll remain semi-retired, with the hope of someday getting a 'laptop' (which will allow me to lay on my back). I guess my 'roids frustration' was clouding my judgement yesterday. Note: I've re-edited my postings yesterday to reflect my changed mood: retirement postpond'. GoodDay (talk) 18:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Hallelujah!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Lying down with a laptop is not all its cracked up to be. It's so annoying having to get up again. ;) Jack forbes (talk) 18:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

For me, it'll be better then a chair (I may never sit down again). Right now, I'm actually alternating between 'standing up' & 'kneeling'. GoodDay (talk) 18:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I've googled your condition. Seems its a pain in the b*** but not too serious - you will sit again:) And you will edit again! Sarah777 (talk) 23:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm gonna hang around afterall (in a semi kinda way). GoodDay (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah - I know a wikicrack addict when I see one...  :-) --HighKing (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

No buts about it. GoodDay (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank goodness. This place has been a lot less fun lately as it is. -Rrius (talk) 02:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

I won't be as active, but I'll be around. GoodDay (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

GoodDay, until Santa shimmies down your chimney with the laptop you can always put your computer on top of a prie-Dieu.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

That's OK. The doc has given me a solution. I wonder if an anti-gravity thingy, might be invented soon? GoodDay (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Glad to hear you are staying =) BritishWatcher (talk) 14:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll be around roughly 1hr or less, per day. Having seen the doc, I've got an internal hemmy, which (with sapositories) is easily taken care of. My lifestyle has to change, with more walking & other physical activities. GoodDay (talk) 20:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey I've just logged in and found out. This is bad news. I hope to see you around more often again one day. ðarkuncoll 20:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

I'm gonna hang around afterall, Tharky. Not as often as I used to, it's a lifestyle change. GoodDay (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Don't you live on an island? I would imagine it would be amazing seeing all the island while jogging and getting fit. Jack forbes (talk) 20:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) I'm not that ambitious (at least not yet). Before I jog, I must walk. GoodDay (talk) 21:29, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

You should notice the difference in no time. I was so unfit I couldn't run upstairs without getting out of breath. A month or so after taking up jogging and lifting weights (not too heavy at first) I felt so much better. It's hard at first but well worth it GoodDay. Jack forbes (talk) 21:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

In honour of your semi-retirement: List of Calgary Flames captains.  ;) Resolute 02:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

GoodDay, you also might want to enroll in a gym. Is there one near you with a heated pool? Jogging and walking are both very good ways to get back into shape, however in my opinion, swimming is the best activity there is. I swim all summer long and I really notice the difference. Besides, it's FUN!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Is a suppository suppose to go & stay all the ways in? I've never used them before (until last night, which it kept trying to pop out). PS: If I'm getting too personal here, let me know ya'll. Afterall, this is one of those situations, where nobody looks at anybody. GoodDay (talk) 16:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Suppositories ain't so bad, GoodDay

As a mother of four, I'll admit to having had experience with those little ass-blimps. They are rather hard to push in. Try wetting it first, that helps it go in easier. Better yet, get a sexy nurse to give you a hand!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Sexy nurse? It won't work, 'cause I'll wanna be the inserter. GoodDay (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

That would be the obvious chain reaction, eh?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

I sure was relieved, to see how small those torpedoes were. GoodDay (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

We all live in the Yellow Submarine--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

From this time forward, I'll always have a chuckle when I hear that tune. I shall endeaver to be jogging, when listing to it again. GoodDay (talk) 16:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Sky of blue and sea of green, in our yellow submarine, yee hee--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:59, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Trumpets & all. See ya tomorrow Jeanne, I'm gonna try & appear daily between 16:00 & 17:00 UTC. PS- thanks for the suppository advice (and assurances). GoodDay (talk) 17:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem. See you later alligator.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Well its nice to know that your not fully retired. It looks like many people, including myself, appreciate the help and conversations you have given over the years. -- Phoenix (talk) 02:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. GoodDay (talk) 15:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Running is good. I enter little races, that way I have an 'exam' I have to work for. You could start by entering a 2km run for a few weeks' time (that's a mile and a quarter.) Train for it following one of the numerous beginning running schedules on the internets, and listen to your limbs. Then 5k, 10k, etc leaving a while (but not too long) in between each one. If I don't have an 'exam' I don't work lol but maybe that's just my psychology.:) Glad you haven't gone:) I'm checking into the wikiholics' anonymous programme myself lol.:)Sticky Parkin 01:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm getting the hang of walking, again. If I felt any better, I'd be twins. GoodDay (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Ireland collaboration

GoodDay, have you seen the responses to our statements on the Ireland collaboration page?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

You've got some support for your statement. I've got none. GoodDay (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

I made a short, concise statement, nothing verbose or flowery. I was asked to comment and I did. I have said why I don't like the term ROI, but I really don't have the time to go into elaborate details with facts and refs proving this, disproving that, etc. All my life I have heard/used the term Ireland, but I won't get into an edit war over it. I'm far too busy with my own articles LOL! If other editors support my statement, fine, if they oppose it....oh well.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm willing to go along with any solution, that comes out of the Collaboration process. GoodDay (talk) 14:31, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Very few people have left their statements. I had thought there would have been more of a response, eh?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. (PS: I was side-tracked for awhile, my niece had computer control). GoodDay (talk) 18:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Ah hah! the responses to our statements you were referring to, is Kittybrewster's responses. I've responded in kind. GoodDay (talk) 19:34, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Where is your reply? I can't find it.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk: WikiProject Ireland Collaboration/statementbyMooretwin. Kittybrewster, seemed to suggest that my statement was meaningless dribble. GoodDay (talk) 13:27, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

You made an honest statement like I did. We were all asked to give our statements. If someone does not personally like what we wrote, tough titty. We were "asked" to comment.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:41, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. GoodDay (talk) 17:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

What really pissed me off is that when I endorsed or opposed BrownHairedGirl's statements, my qualifying comments which EXPLAINED why I gave the responses that I did, were deleted. My remarks were pertinent to my endorsements/oppositions. God, I feel misrepresented with that journalistic stunt.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I think my credability with the Ireland naming crowd, is in tatters. GoodDay (talk) 16:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Why? You gave an honest gut-reaction response, which to me is far more sincere than a long, verbose statement planned and executed after a week's pondering.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

About a year ago, I favoured the 3 articles the way they are. Then gradually, I preferred moving them from Ireland, Ireland (disabiguation) and Republic of Ireland to Ireland (island), Ireland & Ireland (state). Now, I'm neutral on the subject. I'm guessing, my changing PoV has made me unhelpful. GoodDay (talk) 17:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I've thought of getting involved in those discussions again, then thought again. For those who have a political view there is very little chance anyone is going to change there minds, and no matter how hard a person genuinely tries to put it aside it will always influence there thoughts. I do wonder if this debate will ever be concluded. Jack forbes (talk) 17:13, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Whatever's decided, it won't be universally accepted. Though we can't proove it, I suspect Irish nationalism & British nationalism is interwinded in those disputes. The current collaboration process has accomplished something though, as their hasn't been any page-movement disputes on the 3-articles-in-question, for weeks. GoodDay (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't think there is any need to prove nationalism on both sides is an influence, everyone knows without saying it that it is. It's very similar to the Scotland article. I am obviously a Scottish nationalist, though I genuinely believe any proposals I put forward are thought out with the best intentions, as I presume are those of a different political bent. As for Ireland, why it can't be Ireland(State), Ireland(Island) with Ireland being the disambiguation page I don't know. Jack forbes (talk) 17:28, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) I reckon, some see having Republic of Ireland re-named Ireland (with any accompanying discriptive) as suspicious. It would be so much easier if Ireland were re-united, but (thanks to the IRA) that may not happen for quite some time. GoodDay (talk)

I wonder what they are suspicious of? That using Ireland(State) on Wikipedia will suddenly lead to a united Ireland? All a bit silly really. As`for the latest killings in N.Ireland, I honestly don't think it will escalate as the vast majority people don't want it and it's easy for these small groups to call themselves the real IRA, it doesn't make it so. Jack forbes (talk) 17:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

It's the symbolism of the name Ireland, I suppose. One wonders though, if re-unification occured? which article would get the name: the island? or the expanded state? GoodDay (talk) 17:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

And another verbal battle would ensue. :) Jack forbes (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Indeed. GoodDay (talk) 17:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

And we'll all need to don suits of armour a la Henry V. Have you got yours nice and polished, GoodDay?!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:16, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I have my famed Football Helmit. GoodDay (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

GoodDay and his fight for fitness

Hey, GoodDay. How's your fitness regime getting on? You'll need to keep everyone up to date you know. I'm sure we're all rooting for you. Today huffing and puffing up the steps, tomorrow jogging and swimming for miles. :) Jack forbes (talk) 15:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

GoodDay (or is it GooDay), if it's too cold for jogging, I've a good idea on staying fit, whilst staying INDOORS.: Invest in a bunch of classic Stones CDs, and start doing Mick Jagger stage impersonations, complete with lip pouting, leaps, and strutting. If he manages to stay fit at his age doing those antics, I'm sure it'll do you the world of good at 37.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Leave out the drugs and alcohol, you wouldn't want his complexion. Be careful GoodDay, this Jeanne one might lead you astray. ;) Jack forbes (talk) 16:04, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Me lead GoodDay astray?! Jack, I'm a middle-aged mother of four. Purrrrrrrfectly respectable and (ahem) guaranteed not to make a spectacle of oneself in public, I might add.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

I've known many middle aged mothers that would make your hair curl with some of the things they get up to. Of course, God forfend you are like that. I'm confident you are a proper and upright member of society. :) Jack forbes (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

In point of fact, I'm a boring, UPTIGHT member of society. Ha, just joking. PS, has GoodDay gone away already-oh, I can hear the Stones in the background, Start Me Up.....I never stop, never stop GoodDay, I see has taken my advice. Oh, what a good Jagger he makes, especially with the pouts and strutting!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:49, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Being 6ft & 155 Ibs is a healthy start. I feel lighter on my feet & have more wind in my lungs. GoodDay (talk) 18:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Yay well done. Don't lose any more now, that's enough. It's been cold enough for me to have an excuse not to run all winter- so I got a £75 basic treadmill and did a bit while watching telly instead.:) Sticky Parkin 20:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

How much is that, in Canadian money? GoodDay (talk) 13:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

$133.25 at the moment:) You should be able to find a manual one for that price in a similar shop. It was from Argos (retailer). There's one for $199 in canadian walmarts, but I think you could find cheaper than that.:) This is for a manual (non-motorised) one, but they work fine. Sticky Parkin 20:03, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I think I'll stick to outdoors walking, on account that I'm cheap. GoodDay (talk) 14:44, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh you're cheap as well? Good, so am I, welcome to the club!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Spening money is cool, when it's another's money. GoodDay (talk) 16:06, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Try a local auction. There are auctions are all over southern Ontario and I wll bet that PEI has them, too. People buy the machines initially with good intentions, and then the machine sits in the TV room until someone gets tired of tripping over it or dusting aorund it. I bought one at action (motorized) that I swear had never had a foot set on it) for $125.00. You do need a truck or access to one to get it home, though. // BL \\ (talk) 14:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Nay! In truth, it's my theory that people get into shape, while trying to assemble those excercise contraptions. GoodDay (talk) 22:30, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

GD, I still think the Mick Jagger routine is the best way of getting fit! Try it, it can't hurt, (unless you break an ankle while prancing around the room).--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:34, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I shall consider it. GoodDay (talk) 14:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll join ya.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

To us then, the Jagger joggers. GoodDay (talk) 15:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

You'll have to change your name to Jumpin' Jack Flash, GoodDay!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

It would be a gas. Particularly, if I ate beans before the jog. GoodDay (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Have you noticed that Wikipedia has become a dead zone on weekends? Where in 'ell is everybody, eh? Out having FUN, I suppose!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

That appears to be the case. HENRY V isn't on holiday though, he's proposing to add Henry VI of England to the List of French monarchs article. GoodDay (talk) 16:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh God....--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Yep, he's gonna continue to beat us over the head, with the Treaty of Troyes. -- GoodDay (talk) 16:18, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Take a look at his latest message on my talk page. Whew!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Yikes, a long post in broken English. PS- See ya tomorrow. GoodDay (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

GooDay will you and jeanne stop talking about me because this is insulting.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 22:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Okie Dokie. PS: It's GoodDay. GoodDay (talk) 14:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Henry, we were not insulting you.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:24, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

HENRY VI (Part 4)

Hello GoodDay Im going to adopt your nav box for henry vi today.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

That's acceptable. GoodDay (talk) 14:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Its perfect well done.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 17:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

GOODAY could you please give me refference to books which actualy openly state that henry is not considerd a french monarch.In the french kings article it says Henry VI succeded Charles VI as king.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 13:52, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not good at presenting references. Why not simply say, the French succession (from 1422 to 1429) was disputed, between Uncle Charles & Nephew Henry? GoodDay (talk) 22:36, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

LEAVE CHARLES REIGN ALONE.for the final time gooday charles reign began in 1422 due to de faco soverignty and regognition as bieng king of france and please try to understand that his de jure reign began in 1429.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Exactly, Charles VII's reign began in 1422. GoodDay (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Hear! Hear!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Let's look at a similiar situation. In England, during the final year of King John's reign, the future Louis VIII of France's armies held alot of control of England. Do we list Louis in the List of English monarchs with a reign of 1216-17? GoodDay (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Good point. Another analogy would be the 16th century when many Catholics in England and throughout Europe regarded Mary, Queen of Scots as the rightful queen of England rather than Elizabeth I. Are we to list Mary as Queen Mary II of England?!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. Monarchs claiming other Monarch's thrones (particularly in those days) was sorta common. GoodDay (talk) 15:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Anyroad, we cannot go around changing articles (and history) at our own whims. If we all did that Wikipedia would be more chaotic than it already is. Many people, including myself, have their historical icons, but we cannot alter history just to exalt those very icons up to a lofty stature they never enjoyed whilst alive.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

LOL GooDay you might be right.Why not he had de facto soverirgnty and was proclaimed king in london I'll suport you if you want him to be in the english list of monarchs.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 18:23, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Remember this is an encyclopedia, Henry. We cannot afford to treat history in a frivolous manner such as to arbitrarily play musical chairs with the biographies of the monarchs of Europe. We are here to edit articles and provide reliable sources, but not to practice historical revisioning.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Actually on 2nd thought Louis VIII is not a king of france.LOOK up louis viii article on the disscution tab and you will find a user asking a question about louis bieng a english monarch and another good answer to the question by another user.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I have replied on the Louis VIII talk page. I suppose Perkin Warbeck should be added to the list of English monarchs as "Richard IV" and Lambert Simnel as King "Edward VI". In point of fact, the latter was crowned king in Dublin, whereas Louis VIII never was crowned King of England.Henry, do you see where all this speculation is leading?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Louis VIII of France shouldn't be in the List of English monarchs & Henry VI of England shouldn't be in the List of French monarchs, IMO. GoodDay (talk) 14:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) I've requested opinon from Wikipedia:WikiProject Royalty, over wether or not, we should be even considering Henry VI of England as having been King of France. GoodDay (talk) 14:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

That was a wise move. Let them deal with this migraine-inducing conundrum. Now Louis VIII has been dragged into this.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm also still shocked over at Maria II of Portugal & Miguel of Portugal articles. GoodDay (talk) 14:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Louis VIII is not a king of england because of the treaty of kingston.Louis VIII had no notable blood claim or any law on his side to provoke an action such as claiming the english throne.He was hover solidly-proclaimed king of england but upon King john death henry succeded and thus the barons abondand Louis.It wasnt as simple as henry succeding to the throne if louis hadent signed the treaty.To refuse the idea of a 2nd invasion of england and the embareesment of giving the english throne to a frenchmen the barons asked louis to sign the treaty.Louis admmited he was never the legitimized king of england and said his previous years as king of england was in pretend,thus louis is not a king of england.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 15:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Henry VI was (at best) King of northern France & should not be considered King of France. GoodDay (talk) 15:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

The Plantagenet kings of England were French by blood, not English (as in Saxon).--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello Gooday I respect what youre saying but henry succeded as king of france and thus he is a french king.Henry was obviously a king of france but as I said Louis was never king of england because of the reason above unless of coure you want louis title as king of england in pretensce since he admitted that in the treaty.Henry VI succeded as the de jure or legal soveriegn of france so there is no appropriate reason why he is not a french monarch,and as I said before please give me reference to books which actually say henry VI was never king of france while many websites,documentries and books say henry VI was the de jure or legal soveriegn of france.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Umm, it's GoodDay. Henry VI was not King of France, at best he was King of northern France. I'm sorry HENRY, but it appears we're never gonna agree on this topic. GoodDay (talk) 16:10, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

There is no scholar who would agree that Henry VI was in fact, King Henri II of France. The whole order of French monarchs would need to be changed. The first Bourbon king who flippantly said "Paris is worth a mass" would thus be Henri V! I really think this topic has exhausted itself to the point of near-death. I say we consign poor mad Henry the Lancastrian usurper to a magnificent tomb in Westminster Abbey and let sleeping kings lie.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

GoodDay sorry for mispelling your mockier.On the case of Henry VI,if he succeded to the throne of france how is he not a french monarch.It is wrong to say he was at best king of northen france since he was the legal soveriegn of the entire realm even though as you said it was only put into practice in the north.If youre saying henry is not king of france because he was only de facto of the north then you are undermining charles himeself since he was de facto of the south and you have to remeber chares was removed from succestion so henry became the legal soveriegn of the entire country even if charles VI didnt do it in a legal manner the English could easily prove it was legal since salic law itself only refferd to common or private lands and had nothing to do with succestion of thrones this was discoverd in the 16th century.Henry VI could also be proved as rightful king of france because through Edward III and his mother they had l claim.Catherine of Valious was older then Charles VII and as I said salic law had nothing to do with succestion for thrones.Therefore the french throne could only be justfully claimed through bloodshed.Its an undisputable fact that henry VI was the legal soveriegn of france as part of the aftermath of the treaty of troyes.If Henry V was still alive he would also be the legal king upon asccending to the french throne in 1422.Henry VI succeded as king of france with all the traditional priveliges and many poems were made for him from 1422-1429 as being of descent of Clovis I through both his mother and father.It is also wrong to say he was a USURPER.GoodDay I dont mean to offend you but you have to give me a reason how Edward III didnt have any legal claim and Henry VI wasnt the soveriegn of france from 1422-1429.

Henrys corination however wasnt a traditional corination since Notre-Damm was build as a impresseve cathedral not as a corination site.There were no holy relics in the cathedral and the only none-holy relic there was the crown of thorns.The oil henry was annointed with wasnt holy at all while charles was annointed with holy oil used in the corination for the grand-father of france(Charmaglane) thus the corination wasnt proper and John the duke of Bedford tried to make it close enough to a corination.Its as crazy as an english king bieng crowned king of england in Wales.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 18:02, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Your userpage

"The Flintstones (1960-66) - After the pet cat (who was never seen during the episodes) threw Fred out of the house. Why didn't Fred simply crawl through the window hole, to get back in?" I assumed a major part of the gag was that the cat was smarter than Fred, in that he couldn't figure out how to get in the same way the cat had. Anyway, a fun userpage you have. :) Qqqqqq (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm planning on adding more TV/Movie trivia. Likely some Scooby Doo material. GoodDay (talk) 22:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

The name of my country

Must say, I'm both surprised and disappointed you are supporting the POV pushers at the Foreign Affairs article. All in good faith I'm sure. Sarah777 (talk) 23:56, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

As long as the Irish state article remains at Republic of Ireland, we should use it in other articles content. IMHO, by hiding the current name across Wikipedia, we'll only harden the pro-RoI crowd. GoodDay (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Natasha Richardson

It's sad about Natasha Richardson. The article, however, refuses to say that she is dead. Here in Italy, the news reported her death this morning.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

The article will likely be updated by the end of the day. Surely, the Italian report is reliable. GoodDay (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

post 1707 and all that...

Hi there. I'm sure you are not intending to be provocative, but this is a discussion that could easily offend. Scotland did not cease to exist in 1707, though it ceased to be a sovereign country. People born in Scotland continue to be Scottish, though their citizenship is of the United Kingdom. Cheers Fishiehelper2 (talk) 16:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Fear not, I'm familiar with sensitivities surounding the United Kingdom & Ireland (state). GoodDay (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Maybe you shouldn't have mentioned that you don't like Welsh, English, and Scottish people being called just that if you are familiar with the sensitivities surrounding it. Tumblin Tom (talk) 16:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm not denying that everyone born post-1707 in Scotland is British I'm just saying that that doesn't mean that they aren't Scottish. Like I said, someone from Yorkshire is still a Yorkshireman,someone from Paris is still a Parisian and you hear about Texan oil barons. Just because somewhere isn't sovereign doesn't mean that they can't have demonyms and that people can't be identified as being from there. Since 1992 everyone in the UK has EU citizenship that "exists alongside national citizenship" so by your logic everyone from the UK should be described as an EU citizen on their articles. But perhaps that's me taking it too far. My point on people being identified with non-sovereign regions still stands particularly in relation to the touchy subject of the nations of the British Isles. Scroggie (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

No one born in the UK can deny their citizenship, what they can do is define how they are seen. I have never in all my life told anyone I am British, though I can be called a British citizen. Where it can get touchy is when someone say's it is wrong to call someone English, Scottish etc. Tumblin Tom (talk) 21:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree. The word British is an umbrella term that should only be used to describe a person's legal citizenship, never nationality. A Scot does not cease to be Scottish despite the fact that he's a British citizen and carries a British passport. The same goes for English, Welsh, Northern Irish Protestants, etc.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 08:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

My point is, British comes before English, Scottish, Welsh & Northern Irish. GoodDay (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Why? Because you say so? I'm Scottish before I'm British, are you saying I'm wrong? Tumblin Tom (talk) 15:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Errr, Yep. However, I have (of course) no intentions of pushing my PoV on Wikipedia (on account that I'll never get a consensus for it). GoodDay (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, don't push your POV on to me. What are you, a member of the thought police? Tumblin Tom (talk) 15:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Nope, I'm not a member of TP. Relax, haven't ya noticed? I haven't been changing British biography articles to match my personal preferences. I may recommend such things on their discussion pages, but I would never go edit them without consensus. GoodDay (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll relax when you stop telling people what they are and what they should think. Do you say these things just to wind people up? It's certainly not for the good of wikipedia if you know you will never get consensus. Tumblin Tom (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't say these things to wind people up, as they shouldn't be wound up. We could be having this discussion at your Userpage, but I'd rather not. If you're upset with me? I'm sorry for it. But, I am allowed my views at my Userpage. GoodDay (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

And strange views they are too. You should keep your trolling to your userpage and leave the article talk pages alone. Tumblin Tom (talk) 15:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) Strange views to you perhaps, but not to me. As for describing my usage of Wikipedia 'talk pages' as trolling? I'll consider that a pro-censurship view, on your part. Anyways, it's nothing for me to get 'upset' about. GoodDay (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

If you say "I'll never get consensus for it" and you still bring it up that is called trolling. I won't waste any more time here and leave you to your strange views. What's so funny is, your not even "British" your a Canadian from a little island trying to tell people from another country what to think! That is funny! Tumblin Tom (talk) 15:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm glad to have given you a laugh. GoodDay (talk) 16:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

PS- It could've been worse. I could've cast an evil spell on Wikipedia, forcing all editors to dream about Nichelle Nichols & Anson Williams as a non-stop singing duet. GoodDay (talk) 16:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Never heard of them. I take it their not very good singers? Tumblin Tom (talk) 16:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The former is from Star Trek & the latter from Happy Days. GoodDay (talk) 16:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Nichelle Nichols and Anson Williams?! GoodDay, are you sure you were born as late as 1971? Those two were all washed up by that time.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:43, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

I've seen them in syndication & their singing is still flat. GoodDay (talk) 16:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Wasn't she Lieutenant err, uhuruhuhu. Tumblin Tom (talk) 16:45, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Uhura, the communications officer. GoodDay (talk) 16:49, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Forgive my ignorance. Anson was on Happy Days. I had him confused with the eldest brother on The Brady Bunch.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

IMO, Don Most & Ron Howard were better singers. Yet, the show kept putting Williams up front; go figure. GoodDay (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Barry Williams was the guy I was thinking of. I remember my friend and I found his phone number in the LA phone book. We called him up all the time. He used to get really pissed off and launched some choice insults at me. Hee hee hee.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Naughty girls. Well, my approximate '2 hours' is up. I'll see ya'll (figuritively speaking) tomorrow. GoodDay (talk) 17:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Are you still there?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I've just signed-in. GoodDay (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Henry VI (Part 5)

Hello GoodDay can I please add Henry VI to the french kings article please because I already asked a request for it?Dont worry if you dont agree I will not impose the edit until further disscution and conclustion.Your say is important.Thankyou.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

There's already a small note about Henry VI, in that article. Besides, you don't need my permission to add/delete anything on Wikipedia. I'm not the boss. GoodDay (talk) 15:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok then I will go on with the edit since I already requested it.Goodby GoodDay.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 17:21, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello GoodDay.Do you have any problems with my edit?--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 19:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Henry VI shouldn't be listed in the List of French monarchs article, but merely given a note. GoodDay (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree with GoodDay. Henry, you cannot list him as a French monarch, otherwise you'd have to call him Henri II-which we both know he was not!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I deleted his entry of House of Lancaster.Life is complicated enough, eh?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:38, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Much better. I've checked my Funk & Wagnalls encyclopedias & they don't have Henry VI in their French monarch lists. GoodDay (talk) 15:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Had he been a genuine French monarch, he'd have been Henri Deux.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Which would've caused a re-numbering of the latter Henrys. It's tough enough, that Charles X's elder son & grandson are considered Louis XIX & Henry V. GoodDay (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm no expert but claiming to be a French King and being French King are two different things aren't they? Out of curiosity, who proclaimed Henry VI as King of France? Was it the French or English? Jack forbes (talk) 15:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

It's the belief theory: I'm just as powerful as the Pope, I just don't have as many people who believe it. It all comes down (I suppose) to the legitimacy of the Troyes Treaty. -- GoodDay (talk) 15:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I see now. The problem with signing a treaty as a defeated force is that it is always signed under duress and once that is over it can be dismissed as just that. It's like someone putting a gun to my head telling me to sign over all my worldly goods to him, I'll do it, then the minute he leaves I'd phone my lawyers to cancel the whole thing. Jack forbes (talk) 16:05, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

The treaty was not valid as Charles VI was mad at the time he signed away his own son's inheritance to his son-in-law, Henry V.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:11, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Today it would be invalid due to him not of being of sound mind. I wonder though who would have had the courage to tell him that. Jack forbes (talk) 16:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Joan of Arc! LOL--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I wonder if she did. She probably had more balls than the rest of them put together. There's a woman I'd liked to have met, although asking her out for a meal might not have been her idea of a good time. Jack forbes (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

She would probably prefer a night down at the local pub with a couple of pints of Guinness!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

And a sword by her side in the event of any trouble. Yeah! I'd go to the pub with her. Jack forbes (talk) 16:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Can GoodDay and I come along too? Pretty please?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

What, you mean like a double date? Certainly, the more the merrier! I'll have to find Joan first, she may be hard to track down. Jack forbes (talk) 22:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

True Confessions

The Vatican would be a good place to start your search. I imagine that all the saints hang out there.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Never been out with a saint before. I've been out with a few sinners though! LOL Jack forbes (talk) 12:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Haven't we all?!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't know, we'll have to ask GoodDay. Jack forbes (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

GoodDay, we're waiting for you. Hurry up, we're discussing sinners!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I un-intentionally committed adultry at one time. My female partner-in-crime, failed to inform me that she was married (waiting until after our intimacies). GoodDay (talk) 18:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Could have been worse GD. She could have told you she was on the pill-then 9 months later presented you with a living, breathing, expensive reminder of her adultery (YOU didn't commit adultery, she did! My priest would say your sin was fornication).--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The question is GoodDay, did you go back for more? Jack forbes (talk) 18:19, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

She & I were together for six-weeks. Eeringly, she & her husband apparently got back together & had a child (10-months after our last intimate meeting 'phew'). Eek, their other child was 8yrs-old. GoodDay (talk) 18:24, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That was a close call. Obviously her wedded state didn't cause you to fear for your immortal (immoral) soul!LOL!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't have mind if it were my child. The tough part, would've been she & child moved back to Vancouver. -- GoodDay (talk) 18:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

When I lived in Dublin back in the 1980s, I once had a boyfriend from Belfast who never knew my address, phone number, nor my marital status! How's that for being a woman of mystery?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I must come clean, I knew my female friend was married, about 1-week into our meetings. Fell out of love with her shortly after. The last 3-weeks, I merely hung on for the sex. GoodDay (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Why do you think I went with my boyfriend from Belfast?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Ahhh, the pleasures of orgasims. GoodDay (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Remember, a few minutes of pleasure can bring a lifetime of regret.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

SINNERS! I've kept this from you till now. I'm actually a catholic priest and will now pray for your souls lest they forever languish in the fires of hell! LOL Jack forbes (talk) 18:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Forgive me father, but I want to sin, like, right now

You got your purple stole on, Father Forbes? Let's get the show on the road!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:55, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

As I'm athiest, the religious side doesn't effect me. But, the potential for VD, has its respect. GoodDay (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

What does VD stand for? Veteran's Day?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 18:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Veneral Diseases. GoodDay (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

General diseases, did you say? What are they: a form of battle stress or shell-shocking, perhaps?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Giggle giggle. It's ironic, the best thing a male & female can do together & it's potential dangerous. GoodDay (talk) 19:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

A veteran, especially a veteran General wouldn't get VD. I'm allergic to penicillan so have always been very very careful. Jack forbes (talk) 19:08, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I too am allergic to penicillan. Yet I've managed to have un-protected encounters with 2 females. When you're in the mood, it's difficult to think rationally. GoodDay (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I hate to repeat myself, lads but a few minutes of pleasure can bring a lifetime of regret. Old-fashioned but sound advice.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

My motto was "Be prepared" Either that or a dose of the clap or even worse. Jack forbes (talk) 19:17, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

It's so totally unfair. A beautiful experience, should be potentially dangerious. GoodDay (talk) 19:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The worse can come in the form of an Evelyn Draper--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

You could always wear a full rubber suit under your clothes for any eventuality's. Could get a bit sweaty though. Jack forbes (talk) 19:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) I suppose, the best thing is to ask the gal to join oneself in going to get medically tested (if it's a serious relationship) for diseases. If clean, continue the relationship. GoodDay (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

You could always say "No", or better yet, join the priesthood. --Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Then again.....

I can picture it now. Hello there, would you like to come back to my place for coffee and on the way their we'll drop in at the VD clinic for a check up. Jack forbes (talk) 19:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That the tricky thing. Some gals would take the suggestion as an insult. As for priesthood? not until the celibacy rule is cancelled. GoodDay (talk) 19:36, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Priests are celibate? Nah, I don't believe it. Jack forbes (talk) 19:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

They're suppose to be. But can ya believe it? if they get an erection, they're suppose to prey to a virgin. Sooner or later, something's gonna snap. GoodDay (talk) 19:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

That sounds quite painful. Jack forbes (talk) 19:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I reckon at that point, they'll have to do some healing. GoodDay (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

They should never cancel celibacy. In point of fact, celibacy is the whole thrill, baby.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Oh, did I ever tell you about the scandal I created in my church with a visiting Romanian priest?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

No! Actually in the church! Go on, tell us more. Was he defrocked? ;) Jack forbes (talk) 13:18, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

No he wasn't defrocked (oh I do love that word: defrocked), he has his own parish someplace in Austria. I was confessing to him when the scandal broke out. I'll elaborate when GoodDay comes back on the scene. Hurry up GD, the confessions on your talk page are still goung strong.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

(outdent) Please continue. GoodDay (talk) 16:27, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm embarrassed to tell you the details, suffice to say my regular parish priest had a fit of jealousy-in front of the entire congregation!!!!!--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Never anger a priest. Most guys can show a gal a good time, but priests can offer a gal 'eternity'. GoodDay (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

No grudges

I thought I'd start this new section to say I don't hold any grudges as far as our conversation was concerned. I still stand by my views, although if I was wrong concerning my accusation of trolling then I apologise for saying it. Tumblin Tom (talk) 16:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

No prob. I continue to stand by my views aswell. I'll always invite differing opinons on any subjects, at my Userpage. Every person is my teacher, as that I may learn from him/her, is a motto of mine. GoodDay (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Henry VI (Part 6)

I mentioned all I had to mention and gave you the oppinions of historions so why cant I edit Henry VI as a french king.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 17:07, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

My Funk & Wagnalls encylcopedias, don't list Henry VI among the French monarchs. I can't prevent you from editing anything, but I can disagree with you. You should consider developing other interests on Wikipedia & take a break from the Charles VII/Henry VI topic. GoodDay (talk) 17:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Your enclodipedia definitely says Henry V became heir of france in 1420 and mentiones the treaty of troyes.And as your statement requesting me to take a break on Henry VI and Charles VII OF France I also costantly revise other periods of History from early movemnt of germanic tribes to the reign of queen victoria.Why do you like disagreeing with me?I gave you a good reason how he is king of france.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I've agreed with having the nav boxes in place at Henry VI of England & Charles VII of France, that was my concession. Also, my encyclopedias don't have Henry VI's as King of France from 1422-29, but rather as a claiment. IF you're displeased, seek input elswhere. As I told you before, 'I don't control Wikipedia'. PS: I would appreciate it, if you wouldn't bring up this topic 'here', again. GoodDay (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I gave you a list of books that say he succeded to the french throne.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 18:13, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Are there not books, which say he wasn't King of France? Do as you wish, I'm done with the Charles VII/Henry VI stuff. GoodDay (talk) 18:17, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Lets cool it I apoligise for the start.Ill just ask for the main point why Henry VI cant be mentioned as a king of france.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

'Cause he's normaly not listed with the French monarchs, in any encylopedias that I've had. Perhaps, it has to do with 'to the victor, goes the spoils', I don't know. GoodDay (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

PS- See ya'll tomorrow. GoodDay (talk) 18:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Goodbye goodDay.--HENRY V OF ENGLAND (talk) 18:42, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Republic of Ireland flag in Northern Ireland article

Hello,

Please could you take a look at my edit here. I feel this is a reasonable compromise edit, but is being reverted without proper discussion here.

Regards 89.217.188.221 (talk) 01:35, 26 March 2009 (UTC)