User talk:Omulazimoglu

Welcome!

Hello, Omulazimoglu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Baristarim 12:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Omulazimoglu, As you have been warned stop reverting my edits. If you would like to contribute to articles, please do so, but please don't just revert edits.

Re: problem

Selam Özgür. Charles has actually said the exact same thing to me (that you are reverting his edits), and upon further inspection, you are both reverting each other. I don't have any opinion on the other pages, but I have reverted yoru edit to Ankara. Firstly, many of the changes you made violated Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, such as:

...Celal Bayar Blvd., is a very interesting open-air museum...
Ankara has many delightful parks...
sample such famous products of the farm as its excellent old-fashioned beer...

We should probably be avoiding our own personal opinion here, as the text of these articles should always have an encyclopedic tone. Secondly, I think you should avoid adding the picture of yourself to the article. Please review Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, which states, "In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a clear conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged." I am not suggesting that you should not contribute. Quite the contrary, I think you can provide us with information about Ankara that can help us develop the page. Just make sure to cite reliable sources, and you'll be fine. Kolay gelsin. Khoikhoi 10:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I have rethought this, I don't really have an opinion about the sports section at all. I actually like the image. I apologize for assuming that you've changed parts of the article that you hadn't. Your reasoning for including the image seems logical, and I understand now why you want to add it. Even though Wikipedia is not a democracy, you're more than welcome to contribute to the article as I have already said. Khoikhoi 09:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Turkey

VikiProje Türkiye'ye davet / Invitation to join WikiProject Turkey

Merhaba, sizin VikiProje Türkiye'ye katılabileceğinizi düşündük. Ayrıca yalnız başınıza ya da diğer kullanıcılarla birlikte Türkiye ile ilgili maddeleri düzenleyip geliştirebilirsiniz. Eğer projemize katılmak istiyorsanız lütfen katılımcılar sayfasını ziyaret edin ve adınızı yazın ya da projenin tartışma sayfasına tıklayın. Eğer herhangi bir sorunuz varsa benimle ya da bir başka VikiProje Türkiye üyesi ile bağlantı kurabilirsiniz.

Hi, I was thinking that maybe you would like to join the WikiProject Turkey. There you can also find and contact users who are trying to improve Turkey-related articles. If you would like to get involved, just visit the participants page and/or inquire at the project's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or other member of the WikiProject Turkey.

Cheers! Baristarim 12:20, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Violations of WP:NOR and WP:V

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Tobacco smoking. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Thank you. The text you persist in re-adding to Tobacco smoking#Islam violates official Wikipedia policies:

The text already present in that section summarizes your version quite well. There is no need to introduce additional redundant text (with poor grammar) that cites no sources. Please do not add it back before justifying your edits on Talk:Tobacco smoking. -Amatulic 17:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Tobacco smoking. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Amatulic 18:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Tobacco smoking, you will be blocked from editing. -Amatulic 15:03, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think your edits are vandalism, though maybe 3RR. It would be helpful if you both would stop bickering/reverting and contribute to the article. See my edits there, please. HG | Talk 10:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Repeatedly re-adding unsourced poorly-written POV original research without explanation is vandalism, and gets reported as such. -Amatulic 16:24, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turkopedia

Merhaba Omulazimoglu!

I want to create an encyclopedia on the Wikia website called Turkopedia. It will be in English, and will be all about everything to do with Turkey and Turkish people.

Unfortunately I need at least 20 people (including me, so there's 19 people left) to assist me in this project. Would you like to take part?

Onur 17:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

request

arkadaşlar merhaba, şu sıralar wikideki ermeniler iyice azıtmış durumda, türkiye ve türkler hakkındaki tüm kaynakları referanslarıyla birlikte imha çabası içerisindeler. özellikle "Turkey", "Turkish People" ve "Turkic peoples " sayfaları ve bunlar ile bağlantılı sayfalar hiç olmadığı kadar tehdit altında, türkiyenin neredeyse tüm şehirlerinin sayfalarına kendi ulusal reklamlarını eklemek üzereler. bununlada yetineyip kendileriyle hiçbir alakası olmayan "tarihteki türk uygarlıkları" ile ilgili makalelere saldırma çirkinliğini de atlamıyorlar. lütfen aşşağıdaki bu ve bunun gibi wiki bağlantılarını kullanarak bu tehdite karşı koyalım. sayıları bizden çok daha az yeterki organize olalım. saygılar

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism

--hakozen 01:15, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Resim 075.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Resim 075.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:18, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For adding those beautiful pictures to the Lesbos Island article! This one in particular is quite stunning. There is a similar picture uploaded by someone else that is one of my favorites as well. Not sure if you have seen this one:

Thanks agian,
Khoikhoi 08:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kilitbahir by omulazimoglu.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kilitbahir by omulazimoglu.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 10:54, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ansiklopedika

A tag has been placed on Ansiklopedika requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ansiklopedika.org

A tag has been placed on Ansiklopedika.org requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

AfD nomination of Ansiklopedika.org

I have nominated Ansiklopedika.org, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ansiklopedika.org. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ipatrol (talk) 19:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created is about to be deleted: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Ansiklopedika.org is about to be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ansiklopedika.org.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
You can merge the article into a larger article.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 22:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ansiklopedika.org

I have replied to your comment. Ironholds (talk) 08:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of assassinated Turkish diplomats by Armenian terrorist groups

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of assassinated Turkish diplomats by Armenian terrorist groups, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#IINFO, possible NPOV issues, no references, orphan

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF (talk) 14:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ansiklopedika

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Ansiklopedika, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: File:Symbol reply.svg. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support for deleting the Category:Anti-Armenianism

Will you support my arguement for the deletion of the Category:Anti-Armenianism that I put forward on May 1, 2009?

It is very subjective and even racist as it puts every person who questions the Armenian genocide, such as prominent academicians, who are not racist or personally against Armenian people or Armenia as an entity, along with assasins and militants.

Thank you

81.214.147.154