Jump to content

User talk:Amalthea

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lilybaeum (talk | contribs) at 21:43, 17 May 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Archive box collapsible


Articles with topics of unclear notability Graph

I just spotted your posting from a few months ago. The graph looks great! I'd say "implement". Thanks! --Stormbay (talk) 19:18, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my, has that been four months already?
I have to fix one remaining issue with it (the number of months to show isn't automatically detected yet), but I guess I'll just do it then and move it to the category page afterwards. :)
It will probably take me a couple of days though.
Cheers, AmaltheaTalk 19:24, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'll be watching for it! --Stormbay (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I've done some more work on it in the last few weeks - at least that over zealous Saddle Club fan seems to have disappeared, thank goodness. Paul Austin (talk) 20:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's good, but all of the inline sources were apparently lost in her last editing spree. I'll have a look at the article, but only after the holidays.
Cheers, Amalthea 12:56, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another award

The da Vinci Barnstar
For your help debugging and improving Sambot's undecial[1] function, I award you this token of appreciation. – Quadell (talk) 00:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


1.^ Sounds better than "eleventh", doesn't it?[2]
2.^ Hmm, I don't know. Sounds wrong? But thanks, anyway. :) --Amalthea 12:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hyperforeignisms for fun and profit! – Quadell (talk) 13:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CSD decline script

Hi there. Seeing your talent with scripting and Animum's apparent lack of time to work on it, would you consider creating that CSD decline script I was fantasizing about? Regards SoWhy 13:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I won't make you any promises as to when I get it done, but I'll put it on my short-term to-do list, and will drop Animum a line when I start working on it. Amalthea 13:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it would be great, if you could but I won't lose (much) sleep over it if it takes a bit. Here's my original request to Animum and here's a list of some things I'd like it to do. TIA SoWhy 13:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If this materializes let me know... ---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 21:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Funny how things turn out, you're doing far more CSD work than me. :) Amalthea 21:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Your recent edits

Hello, you recently expressed some concern in some of my recent edits.

The Women's American Football article was edited because it appeared that the photograph was referring to the male quarterback as a female and hence an attempted insult towards the individual; coincidentally having a female name 'Donna'. After closer examination, it appears that the Defensive end was in fact the female, but it was slightly difficult to discern as the equipment and masculine features somewhat mask the gender.

I felt that user: radiant chains was being snide towards me, saying such items as "Welcome to Wikipedia!", offensive because I've been a registered user and frequent editor since 2006. Furthermore, he has unjustly submitted a deletion request against an article I created, so I took the liberty of reverting some of his edits that I felt were incorrect.

Do not accuse me of sinister activity, as I am only here to better Wikipedia with my wealth of knowledge. However, at the same time, I will not take vulgarity towards myself or my work. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloodknight (talkcontribs) 00:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not accusing you of sinister activity. I expressed my concerns about your rather hostile posts on Radiant chains's user and user talk page, while he didn't do anything wrong. Concerning the song article, Wikipedia has rather strict guidelines about which songs should have a standalone article, which is laid out at WP:NSONGS. As you can see in the AfD, this guideline is still backed up by consensus of the editors here. He could have approached you first with his concerns, but most probably it wouldn't have changed anything. Retaliating by undoing his edits in turn is really not going to help anybody.
Amalthea 11:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle Bugs

I would like you to re-vise the case closure of my bug report on Twinkle - on the information that my account is auto-confirmed - therefore the conclusion it's a twinkle bug which is now becoming extremely inconvenient in it's restriction of my anti-vandalism activities. I would be most appreaciative if you could assist me in this matter.

Wikipedian2 (talk) 17:22, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've answered at WP:TW/BUG#286. Cheers, Amalthea 11:21, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{puic}}

Hi! Sambot 11 is now up and running, so if you want to turn off automatic tagging in Twinkle, now would be a great time :-) Thanks for your help with the code. [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 11:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks & Cheers, Amalthea 11:20, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've moved your question to my talkpage, to avoid the bot stopping every time either of us posts anything :-) [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 14:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bad image list

Good idea. Now why didn't I thought of that. :) Garion96 (talk) 23:59, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:)
Yeah, this list is getting a bit long, and if we don't want to end up having all of commons:Category:Nudity and commons:Category:Feces in it I guess putting expiry dates into the comments is necessary.
Cheers, Amalthea 00:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Amalthea. You have new messages at Radiant chains's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Radiant chains (talk) 07:35, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to have reverted quite a lot of this editor's edits; you might be interested in my SPI report of this editor ;-) Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 13:14, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was on my way to notify you about that user when I saw that you had already filed a CU request. :) --Amalthea 13:16, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It still doesnt work

My username still won't show up. I will not be able to answer immediatly. Abce2

What do you mean, "still"?
You can always go to your preferences, uncheck the "Raw signature" checkbox and blank the associated textbox, and you'll be back to the default. Amalthea 12:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, I changed the code I've left on your page, could you try again please? Amalthea 16:41, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again

It still does not work. What am I doing wrong? --[[User:Abce2|<font face=Fantasy color=#36F>Abce2</font>]]|<small>[[User Talk:Abce2|<font face=Verdana color=#09A>''How''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Abce2|<font face=Fantasy color=#FA1>''dy!''</font>]]</small> (talk) 21:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing you've left "Raw signature" unchecked? Amalthea 21:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
And you're not using the code I corrected above, with the font face and colors enclosed in quotes. Amalthea 21:21, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still confused. I used the code but it did not work. Abce2

Yes!!!!!!!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for helping me with my signature, whitch finally works. Thank you!!--Abce2|Howdy! 23:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Amalthea's Day!

User:Amalthea has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Amalthea's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Amalthea!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. Und Ausgezeichnet!RlevseTalk 01:25, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, how nice! But that can't be right, there are far, far more awsome editors here than me. Amalthea 10:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Stop being so modest about yourself, you earned it many times over SoWhy 10:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotecton

Hey, could you unprotect my user page. I'm willing to take the vandalisim.--Abce2|Howdy! 21:49, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's your page, but it's a very bad idea at the moment. Playing whack-a-mole with him just because is not going to help defuse the situation. Amalthea 22:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle bug

this, sorry about that, I swear that I looked to see if it was already listed. Perhaps I am going crazy? Either way, thanks for fixing that bug.--Terrillja talk 15:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. As a matter of fact, you made me fix it more quickly since I missed the first bug report on my watchlist. :) Amalthea 15:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Silly rabbit...

admins have acc rights by default, don't they? –xeno talk 13:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep.

Amalthea 13:23, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This friendly message brought to you by the Redundancy Department of Redundancy, Redundant Division.xeno talk 13:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, nah, I didn't really know. I was thinking about creating User:AmaIthea, but that's protected by the anti-spoof protections anyway. Cheers, Amalthea 13:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Saw here that you're helping to deal with my troll. Thanks so much because I'm offline during the day, New York time, and never manage to keep up. I'm semi'ed for a while at the moment, but he's trolling others. Still can't believe how long this insanity is is going over what semi-started with bad CSDs. I say semi - I think Yourname was a sock. StarM 00:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, anytime. :) Cheers, Amalthea 08:01, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title replacing

Hi there Amalthea. Remember the discussion we had about replacing the page title on user pages? It seems like One (talk · contribs) managed to create a working version for text-only (see User:One/Title). Just fyi. =) Regards SoWhy 16:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it's using CSS to roughly position the text div on top of the real title header, and look how it makes your talkpage look in modern skin. :| Amalthea 22:02, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But who is really using modern skin nowadays? ;-) But seriously, I wish the software had an option to display stuff only on a certain skin... SoWhy 07:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Not me, but there are some, apparently.
And I'm afraid that a feature like this would lead to very questionable use (and I think it'd be hard to prevent its use in main space for all browsers) :) Amalthea 08:16, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nicole "Hoopz" Alexander Sextape/Pictures

Video and images began circulating today. I really don't care that you deleted my edits, but it's out there so i won't be the last to contribute this info.

http://www.hithiphop.com/?p=5699

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mP2_5nPZLP0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pimpinmane (talkcontribs) 01:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the links. You were already proven right, but based on that information we really can't add it to the article at this point. It needs to be picked up by one or two respectable news sites first
Thank you, Amalthea 08:19, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pimpinmane (talkcontribs) 11:10, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BARNSTAR

The Original Barnstar
This Barnstar is awarded to Amalthea for her changes to the MediaWiki talk:Newarticletext‎, letting new editors know that userfication is an option. Your dedication to the project and to helping new users is extremely commendable. THANK YOU SO MUCH! Ikip (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The Helping Hand Barnstar
The Helping Hand Barnstar is to be awarded to users who frequently help new users. This Barnstar is awarded to Amalthea, because one barnstar is not enough :) With 76.5% of articles nominated for deletion Articles for deletion are created by new users the changes you made to MediaWiki talk:Newarticletext‎ will help new editors immensely, and hopefully retain new editors. Thanks for your valiant efforts. Ikip (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I like to keep conversations in one place, I have watched your page, so please respond here, thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, just doing my job. Thanks, Amalthea 17:02, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your welcome :) Ikip (talk)

br4011

Thanx. I will do my work Clear. br4011

Very sad that you didn't. Amalthea 11:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World

Nothing but a orange with all of its element —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.255.180.130 (talk) 17:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Amalthea 18:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ARBAMC2

I saw the redirects' fixings you did. I am not really sure if they are covered by this. Stricto sensu maybe not. But ... --Yannismarou (talk) 17:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. After the first four I did remember that there was an injunction in that area and I looked it up, but decided that it wasn't covered, and that it would be against all commons sense to leave a double redirect broken because of it; They all lead to Macedonia anyway, only with a stopover at Republic of Macedonia. If you disagree or think that it might I'm happy to bring it to attention at some forum though.
Cheers, Amalthea 18:50, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Holly Combs

Thanks. I didn't see the other edit. I fixed the reference. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 11:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Amalthea 11:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Courtney Love

Hello Ameltha, how are you? About Courtney Love's backround i have sourced the information in the past, but honestly i do find it hard to believe that she would just make up something like that, unless, of course, she was missquoted, but if a problem seems to rise, i will try and discuss it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.173.210.223 (talkcontribs) 11:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please leave at least a comment at the talk page of the article anyway? I'd expect that some other editor, or All Hallow's Wraith, might otherwise just undo it with the comment that it doesn't say anything about her heritage in the article, only about her claims of her heritage. And I couldn't fault them for that. As I said, it appears sound that if none of her parents are of Jewish ancestry, that she can't be either. I haven't tried investigating any of it myself, but it's quite possible that the was misquoted, or the quote was misinterpreted, or that she was speaking metaphorically, or ...
Cheers, Amalthea 12:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Le French May

why did you redo the description of le french may?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lefrenchmay (talkcontribs) 15:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
I had to remove your change of Le French May since the text you added was taken verbatim from http://www.consulfrance-hongkong.org/spip.php?article3012 and http://www.frenchmay.com/pages/about_us . However, that text is copyrighted and hasn't been released under a free license, so Wikipedia cannot accept it. If you want to change the article, please do so in your own words. You may take information from other pages, but not sentences.
Kind regards, Amalthea 15:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I see that you restored your change while I was writing this message. I will have to undo that again, since it is still a copyright violation. Please, do not readd it again. Amalthea 15:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

but what you have on le french may was badly written....

who are you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lefrenchmay (talkcontribs) 15:56, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and if i don't want to write it myself? can i put up a request saying that i want to learn more about le french may or a certain person, and someone will try to dig up more information and put it up on widipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lefrenchmay (talkcontribs) 15:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nonetheless, Wikipedia can still only accept free content. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or have a look at Wikipedia:Copyrights.
If you do not want to write original content yourself, you can try and ask nicely, for example at the WikiProject Hong Kong. However, bear in mind that this is a project written and maintained by volunteers, so there are no guarantees that your request will get a timely response. If that article is of importance to you, why not try yourself? Pick out the part that you dislike the most, and try to improve it.
Cheers, Amalthea 16:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Hilton

Hi, I moved the messages regarding the edits Tarheelz did to the talkpage of the article. As I'm sure you noticed, the user has a long history of making questionable edits without any sourcing. A lot of good edits, but still a fair number that aren't helping out either. Either way, if you would like to add to the discussion there, feel free.--Terrillja talk 20:24, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Already did. I suggested to move it since you make a good point, and it's easier to find it there in the future.
Tarheelz, yes, I think I left him a couple of messages myself already. It's a bit sad that he is often so non-communicative, and refuses to use edit summaries. :\
Cheers, Amalthea 20:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sir please unblock

Sir Please .I'am Editing Ajith Kumar and Asal only. Please Give me a Last chance. Please Forgive." br4011 —Preceding undated comment added 05:37, 16 May 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Please make such requests at your own talk page, using the {{unblock}} template, so that an uninvolved editor can review them. Try to address the comment left by User:Sandstein in your last attempt. And please note that continuing to edit as an IP will not help your unblock request! Amalthea 21:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

redirect comment

Who is this comment based towards? tedder (talk) 20:58, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No one in particular, just an explanation of the reasoning behind the edit. Why? Amalthea 21:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just making sure it wasn't (accidentally) aimed at me. No worries. tedder (talk) 21:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty. :) Amalthea 21:14, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We appreciate for your contribution regarding turkish people .Also should we inform that the pictures you are trying to replace is highly controversial.Therefore These were removed. best regards