User talk:Expatkiwi

RfC on Argyro

I put an RfC request for Argyrosargyrou. Feel free to contribute: Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Argyrosargyrou

Cadet force images

Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:C-cdt.GIF, Image:C-cpl.GIF, Image:C-fsgt.GIF, Image:C-sgt.GIF, Image:C-uof.gif, and Image:C-wo.GIF. I notice they currently don't have image copyright tags. Could you add those to let us know their copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 15:02, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

Cyprus

You stated that Talat is now president of the TRNC and that Denktash is the "former" president. This is not true, because it's only two days after the election and Talat has not been sworn in yet. Denktash is still president.
It is absurd to list Nakechevan as having "recognised" the TRNC. Nakichevan is a region of Azerbaijan and has no more right to "recognise" other states than does Tasmania.
I don't know what the Islamic Conference have said about the TRNC, but the "United Republic of Cyprus" was only a suggestion in the Annan plan, and doesn't exist: they can't recognise an entity which doesn't exist.

Adam 01:14, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Only sovereign states can "recognise" each other. I don't know what Nakichevan has purported to do but it is not a sovereign state and does not have diplomatic relations with sovereign states, so its "recognition" is no more than a gesture. It cannot be listed alongside Turkey as a state which has recognised the TRNC.
The OIC can say what it likes, but the Annan plan has not been implemented and the "United Republic of Cyprus" does not exist. Therefore it cannot be recognised. In any case the OIC is not a state and its "recognition" is not of the same kind as recognition by a sovereign state. Adam 01:59, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but the word "recognition" has a precise meaning under international law. It's something one sovereign state accords another sovereign state. Neither Nakichevan nor the OIC has the power to recognise the TRNC. The fact that they have purported to do should be mentioned in the text, but they cannot appear alongside Turkey, a sovereign state, as entities which have recognised the TRNC. Adam 02:20, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yes I am referring to "sovereign state-to-state recognition," which is the only form of recognition there is, and is what we are talking about in relation to the TRNC. "A lot of nations recognize Taiwan not as "Republic of China", but as an independent economic entity." This is meaningless. Most countries have economic relations with Taiwan, but don't recognise it. There is no such thing as "independent economic entity" under international law. Adam 04:49, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

An explanation of the TRNC article

===>Clarification: What I call "psychotic ramblings" is the post made by User:212.31.99.114, which you can see here. Sorry for any confusion. Justin (koavf) 14:01, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

Nazi awards

Your efforts on the Awards and decorations of Nazi Germany are much appreciated! Keep up the outstanding work. I'm deep in the weeds with Nazi party paramilitary ranks, or I would be helping out. The Order of the German Eagle is one that Ive been hoping to get started. Maybe you can get the ball rolling. Thanks again for the great work. -Husnock 04:12, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

FAC Support

Come and show your support at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ranks and Insignia of Starfleet. Thanks! -Husnock 07:20, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image license, source

Image:Tc-enclave.jpg is certainly interesting but it lacks license and source. Can you please add those? Rl 10:51, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Turkish Cypriot Genocide

I'm at the end of my revert limit on this article; it needs another one. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 14:48, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, i didnt quite understand your message, i've merely added the Turkish casualties incurred throughout the conflict. --E.A 23:48, 30 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That original paragraph was mine, argy filled it with the usual rants, i removed the rant and reinstated the original version. --E.A 00:12, 31 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA on Argyrosargyrou

I've started a Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration on User:Argyrosargyrou. Please take a look and add any evidence you feel is relevant to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Argyrosargyrou/Evidence. -- ChrisO 22:20, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

NOTE

If you do believe in the US Constitution, like I do, then you would disagree with the apartheid situation in Cyprus and would support a multicultural Cyprus. Unfortunately, you are as guilty as Argyrosargyrou. (UNFanatic 01:56, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC))

I feel sorry for your belief of separation. The irony is that you are not of Cypriot background and can never appreciate or attempt to place yourself in the shoes of other people. I bet you never met a moderate Greek Cypriot or Turkish Cypriot. Yet I believe people like you can be eventually made to see the issue from both sides. I believe in reason and eventually it will come to you. Instead of promoting cooperation you support division. You dont see that the root of the problem lies from outside interference from 3 countries. There still is a movement to promote unity, and it will continue, even if it takes as long as a lifetime. And if you are the type that would hinder that, then I feel sorry for you. (UNFanatic 04:21, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC))

I have read the Annan plan in its entriety (with my busy schedule during the day it took me more than 4 months AFTER the referendum, since the day the official UN website -which is not live anymore last time I checked- updated the plan some 24 hours before the referendum. Now would you vote on something you where you were given 24 hours to get informed and read? To make a point, Europeans voted down their Constitution because they were not adequately informed, and rightly so. Maybe you should try to read the plan and then come to me when you finish reading it. It sure doen't sound like the Constitution that you and I love. That Constitution, and I hope the rest of the world realizes it, is perfection, unlike the Annan plan. (UNFanatic 05:05, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC))

A good example of an article which I 100% agree with on this is the one on Nikos Sampson. I wish I could write more scathing words about him, but I cannot on this site. (UNFanatic 05:14, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC))

I am taking a vacation from now until the end of July. I wish you a pleasant summer. I am still new to this place (which is very interesting, I thought it was a playground (done some stupid things which I will not do again) but wikipedias rules are serious and respectible - maybe I start my own articles on topics on Cyprus and topics different than Cyprus). I hope to continue this conversation in the near future. Your views were informative. Peace.(UNFanatic 05:29, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC))

Erenköy

Thats a great article you've done there, i never knew much about it before, other than its the spot where a lot of young volunteers landed. --E.A 14:36, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please cite sources for Erenkoy article. Definitely NOT a neutral article as it stands. Sources from both sides please!!!!

I made an attempt at writing a more balanced version of the article.I am waiting for your comments..--Jsone 10:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) I see you have edited Erenkoy once more.Look, editing out POV by replacing it with the opposing POV is not improving anything.If you are on some sort of a personal crusade to push TC POV (like your messages clearly indicate) then you should take it out of wikipedia.Try reading Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not sometime.--Jsone 11:04, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Erenköy References

British Columnist David Carter
Cyprus Today Magazine
Los Angeles Hon. Representative for the TRNC
Bayrak Radio and Television Corporation

Cyprus_dispute/New_version

Hi Expatkiwi,

I have come to think that most probably only a new version could help on the Cyprus_dispute, as the current one is very lengthy and also too neutral; a less history-centric view would maybe be favorable. Would you care to drop me a note or edit directly on Cyprus_dispute/New_version? - Snchduer 17:28, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hello again!

Obviously, Ank99 and UNFanatic both favour a clean start article of Cyprus dispute, however they want to be sure that the TR/TC and pro-TR/TC users cooperate properly, if it doesnt mean fighting battles on WP. - Snchduer 13:19, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

unanswered question from The War of the Worlds (novel)

I'd read this novel as fiction, not as scientific paper or manual which needs to cover every detail. Leaving some questions unanswered is quite common writer technique intended to stimulate reader's imagination (or possibly as result of editor's cut :). I am not sure whether the section really belong to article. Pavel Vozenilek 21:34, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Goble drawing

It seems kind of silly to have 2 images of the same thing. I uploaded Image:Gobledrawing.jpg back in July. Then I stumbled on the one you uploaded: Image:Goble4.jpg. You want me to delete yours? I'll add the old one to the London Offensive article. Thunderbrand 04:44, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

OK, I went and deleted the one you uploaded. But I am curious to why you responded on my user page? :) Thunderbrand 17:36, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

Because I Thought that was S.O.P.

Image:Ocdt.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Ocdt.gif has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Foreign Relations article

Nice work, added my two cents. --E.A 18:15, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Trnc-spkr.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file you uploaded, Image:Trnc-spkr.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Hi, I'm preparing some comments to submit to the TRNC (Turkish_Republic_of_Northern_Cyprus) discussion page and would apprecite you feedback/comments. Here it is:

The article (Turkish_Republic_of_Northern_Cyprus) is far from being NPOV and reads like biased political commentary emphasizing and focusing on issues that have more to do with the Cyprus_dispute. For example: there is no section describing the People of the TRNC, but there is an entire section devoted to Property Issues (surely, this section should be in the Cyprus Dispute). The section on Communications and Transport has three paragraphs and each paragraph describes problems such as visa issues rather than giving facts and figures about airports, roads and so on. The History section is factually wrong (see below) and focuses on the non-recognition of the TRNC, rather than giving useful information on why and how the TRNC came into existence.

It is factually wrong and misleading to say that (quote) The independence of northern Cyprus was proclaimed in 1975 under the name Turkish Federated State of Northern Cyprus (unquote). In 1975 Northern Cyprus declared its federated status as part of the Republic of Cyprus. It did not declare its independence until 1983, and that was after years of failed negotiations with South Cyprus and the international community. The article continues (quote) The name was changed to its present form on 15 November 1983 unquote. This is misleading. It was a lot more than a name change. It was the creation of a newly declared independent political entity called the TRNC. The Turkish Federated State of Northern Cyprus was a different political entity. The article needs to be corrected.

If the aim is to create a NPOV objective description of the TRNC, which describes its Geography, People, Economy and so on, then such an article must include a History section which helps us understand how and why the TRNC came into existence; and a People section that explains who the Turkish Cypriots are and where they came from.

--Truth_Seeker 12:30, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I think I will also submit this text to request for unprotection. Trouble is I can't find the TRNC page on the list of protected pages. Whats going on here? and How are disputes settled and pages re-opened?

Image Tagging Image:Monasterymap.GIF

Thanks for uploading Image:Monasterymap.GIF. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much. --Secret london 22:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Politics of Northern Cyprus

Again, good article though I can't think of anything to add in the meantime. --A.Garnet 00:15, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:A15-plaque.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:A15-plaque.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged imaged will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much.--Wikiacc (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

M. Mustafaoğlu

Good job on ferreting out the names of the other articles by Mr. Mustafaoğlu-- he sounds like a remarkable guy. Any hope of adding the citations to where they were published to make it easier for others to look them up? That's what I was getting at when I suggested adding the citations in the "publications" section.

Re-entering

I see you have been in action since my absence. I am a busy man, I must admit. In medical school, the one important thing that exists there that mainstream society lacks is tolerance of people. Of course, mature conversation is always present. I am glad that there is no such thing as global politics in medical school. Imagine if the code of ethics of medicine were accepted by the world there would be no such thing as division. Now I could argue about Cyprus of course, again, but I know that the argument lies with the diplomats, I can only comment. My question for you: Does Turkey recognize the constitution of the Republic of Cyprus, for which it is a signatory of the document? (UNFanatic 04:42, 30 September 2005 (UTC))[reply]

It seems that recent current events influence a re-start of the commentary. (UNFanatic)

A link to an article http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=5&article_id=18931 (UNFanatic 21:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Bad Temper

I am in a bad temper over what is going on on the TRNC article. There is NO millitary occupation. The Greek extremists push and push. They are trying to discredit this beautiful country. I am in a very bad mood indeed. REX 10:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Constitution of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus

Just to let you know that this article really should go into Wikisource: it is source material and is thus unencyclopedic. -- Francs 2000 File:Uk flag large.png 23:19, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Hi you uplaoded all these images Image:Gb-acdr.gif; Image:Gb-acm.gif; Image:Gb-am.gif; Image:Gb-avm.gif; Image:Gb-gcpt.gif; Image:Gb-mraf.gif; Image:Gb-sqnl.gif; Image:Gb-wcdr.gif, and they all lack source information. Please add source information asap or they could be deleted as unsourced images, thanks.--nixie 02:58, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I know of the source: Flags of the World. I know this because of the image style (216 pixel height) and also the file naming scheme. Zach (Sound Off) 05:27, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Award

I award you this barnstar for all your hard work!

About the Tragedy of the Turkish Cypriots Link in TRNC article

I added a link about the Tragedy of the Turkish Cypriots and massacres did by EOKA, what is your decision about this, isn't suitable for the article?-- aozan

about the Tragedy of the Turkish Cypriots

I added a link about the Tragedy of the Turkish Cypriots and massacres did by EOKA, what is your decision about this, isn't suitable for the article?-- aozan

Unofficial flags!?

The images you added to South Island and Stewart Island/Rakiura purport to be unofficial flags for those islands. Who uses them? When and where are they displayed, if ever? Do they really merit space in Wikipedia? Moriori 20:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, I am also ex-RNZAF (R6/82). Secondly, these flags have been displayed on various flag pages and sites. They were evidentally used on occasion to represent sporting teams competing under the names of North Island, South Island, etc..... User:Expatkiwi P.S., The flag of the Chatham Islands is also unofficial, yet it is displayed on a lot more websites and publications.

Let's concentrate on Wikipedia the encyclopedia. Why should an unofficial flag or banner appear in an article about any country if the article doesn't include something substantive to support inclusion of the image? An official flag needs no specific support (in the article) , but display of "unofficial" flags surely needs editorial justification. Why not start a List of Unofficial Flags instead? Moriori 08:08, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Chatham Islands flag has been used on the islands. The North Island and South island flags shown haven't ever been used officially, though the Ross Dependency one has flown over The Ice, and the chevron-shaped South island one has been used at a couple of sporting events unofficially. Grutness...wha? 01:04, 2 December 2005 (UTC) (i.e., James Dignan)[reply]

Image:L-plaques.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:L-plaques.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Image source/licensing for Image:Brt2.jpg

The image you uploaded, Image:Brt2.jpg, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Capeandrew.GIF

Thanks for uploading Capeandrew.GIF. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. Thue | talk 21:11, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Corb-urug.jpg marked for deletion

Hi, I noticed that the Image:Corb-urug.jpg marked for deletion by the image deletion bot. Can you provide some source? It's a nice photo of a rather remote part of the world - it would be a shame to lose it. Thanks. Megapixie 02:55, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From Rex

ENVER HOXHA ENVER HOXHA PARTIA E PUNËS PARTIA E PUNËS! Rex^(talk) 20:46, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brt2.jpg has been listed as a possibly unfree image

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brt2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Sherool (talk) 19:57, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ian Smith

Maybe you should read what he wrote in his books before making your edits. Whatever his faults, Ian Smith's Rhodesia was one hell of a better place than Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe. In any case, the RF contested elections and won all 'A' roll seats (without pulling the ZANU-PF tactic of intimidation and vote-rigging). Expatkiwi

Maybe I have read what he wrote, but that is besides the point and is as off topic as your various presuppositions and juxtapsoitions. El_C 06:00, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Might help if you could spell correctly too ;-). Personally, I think Ian Smith is a better man than most people give him credit for. Expatkiwi

What might be helped? As for your personal opinion regarding Ian Smith, I fail to see how that relates to the material in the article. El_C 06:13, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The issue I have is that Wikipedia is supposed to report FACT, not TRUTH. The latter is open to interpretation. One version of 'truth' is that Ian Smith was a racist by not opting for NIBMAR. The other is that he was a hero who tried to stop his country from going down the same path as the other newly independent African nations (Marxist dictatorships). When one tries to state FACT: ie the Rhodesian Front won all the seats it contested in open elections, you use your version of truth: ie The Rhodesian Front made Rhodesia a One-Party State. I felt it important to qualify the statements that were in the article, which you called biast POV. I could say the same thing about Che Guevara. Expatkiwi

To millions of Africans, it was a one-party rule (same with the UP, though, etc.), even if for Europeans it wasn't; it's a matter of sheer demographics. I'm uncertain what it is that I said about Ian Smith to result in the statement that "you could say the same thing about Che." El_C 06:36, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My reference was that Che can be regarded as a terrorist as one interpretation of truth, while another interpretation of truth is that he was a freedom fighter. Two sides to each argument for all great figures. (The fact of the matter is that Che Guevara was a visionary, an idealist, and a fighter for what he believed in). Expatkiwi

And he is so regarded, of course. But while I can certainly appreciate that observation as well as the sentiment of the closing statement, note that I have never called Ian Smith a terr. I welcome you to review the article I authored on the Central African Federation as well as my Southern Rhodesia draft and would appreciate any input or additions you could offer. Thanks. El_C 07:04, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on Turkish Cypriot rally

Hi,

How are you? I saw your name credited for the design of a banner for the Turkish Cypriot Rally in London [1], good job! I was going to attend but was inundated with work unfortunately. Its great to see such active support. Regards, --A.Garnet 01:53, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Classic Rock

Hello. I was wondering if you would like to participate in my classic rock survey. I'm trying to find the most liked classic rock song. There is more information on my user page. Hope you participate! RENTASTRAWBERRY ^{FOR LET?} röck 02:51, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree flag images

I notice that you have been uploading a lot of flag images from Wikipedia. Be aware that the majority of these images are under copyright, and as such could be pulled from Wikipedia at a moment's notice. This is particularly the case with unofficial flags created by artists outside government agencies. Take, for example, the Flag concepts for the South Island page. These images must be credited both to the creators of them and to FOTW, and must also have the consent of their originators before they can appear on Wikipedia. I have given my consent to my flag being shown here (although you should have sought it first), but Dean Thomas has not given any consent for his flag's appearance, and as such he could demand its removal at any time. DO NOT simply upload flags from FOTW without gaining permission and following the rules! James Dignan, a.k.a. Grutness...wha? 01:13, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you have Dean's consent, then that needs to be stated on the Image page or Image talk page. As to the fotw template, that is on the image page, but firstly that clearly states that you need to have artist's consent (and you never asked me for mine), and it also clearly states that FOTW needs to be credited - which means stating on the page where the image is used that it comes from FOTW. There have already been complaints from FOTW about the use of flag images by you and others on Wikipedia, and images will start to be removed unless they are correctly acknowledged. Have a look at how I've altered Flag concepts for the South Island and you'll ho it should be done. Also, you may have had Dean's consent, but you didn't have mine... so how many other artists have you not asked the consent of? Grutness...wha? 01:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that's quite a bit better, but there's still a problem. Dean's images, like Image:Nz-si.GIF say that he's given permission for Wikipedia to use it, but that it's copyrighted and can't be used elsewhere. Unfortunately, because of the way Wikiepdia works, that ius a big problem, since Wikipedia is GFDL - meaning anyone can use anything that's on there. Copyrighted images are a problem allowed on Wikipedia for that reason. It's a bit of a minefield - Wikipedia:Copyrights has a lot of the information on it. Grutness...wha? 01:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

As i said i got used to doing it with the Germans and Poles over at Oder-Neisse line. PMA 07:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Unfree flag issues again

Disappointingly you re-added the aboriginal flag image to the List of flags with this edit. This is the third time I have removed the image from this page because it is copyright and its use on pages other than the article discussing the flag is not within the Wikipedia:Fair use guidelines. The image's page is clearly tagged as fair use. In reverting your edit to the List of flags I have added a comment for future reference. Please be aware that fair use images have limitations in their use.--A Y Arktos 07:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My comments also apply to your edits to Flags of indigenous peoples, although I appreciate that this was before my comment to you here. However, the immediately preceding edit was mine removing the flag and explaining why in the edit summary. I have now included a comment in that page too against the Australian Aboriginal flag location: .--A Y Arktos 19:38, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]