Jump to content

User talk:Rockero

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rockero (talk | contribs) at 23:17, 19 June 2010 (→‎WikiProject Mexican Americans Tagged As Inactive). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my userpage! Please leave me a message at the bottom of the page unless it is part of a previous discussion. If it has been a few days and you need a quick response, feel free to e-mail me.

Current discussions

Thee Midniters

Hi,

I have added some extra info on Thee Midniters. Please let me know what you think. Regards. Wiki Raja 23:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This one's for you

Thanks so very much for supporting the recent FAC of Hispanic Americans in World War II. It was successful and Hispanic Americans in World War II has been promoted! I'm looking forward to hopefully getting Hispanic Americans in World War II on the front page. In the mean time, please accept this Beer as a token of my gratitude. Salud! Tony the Marine 15:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
¡Gracias Tony!--Rockero 00:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You might like to contribute to the discussion on notability. Tyrenius 17:29, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Gamboa

Hi, Rockero. Can you plug me in to Harry Gamboa? He knows me. Mig 17:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC) Look me up!

Hi, thanks for responding to my request. Something tells me that Harry would never leave L.A. I contacted Pozole, as well -- perhaps he knows where Harry is. I will try the yellow pages. This is political business, BTW, not social. You may delete these messages once read. Regards and all da best Mig 04:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Chicano Power?

So, you believe a non-existent race needs to get their priorites straight? Good thinking. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.195.17 (talk) 00:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't know what you're talking about.--Rockero 00:18, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blah, Blah, Blah. Look at your page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.173.195.17 (talk) 00:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your comments on talkpages and remember to be civil. This talkpage is to be used for discussions of articles, not for social networking. Please refrain from using it for non-encyclopedic purposes. Thanks, --Rockero 00:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HI!

Long time no see-;) Back in Nov 2005, you were one of my first wiki encounters after I got my account, my archives and Yvonne Wanrow. I just ran across you again and wanted to say hi. I see you're still active. I'm now an admin since Feb 2007 and am a project lead coordinator. Rlevse 18:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitgeist the Movie

I just found out.--Rockero 01:13, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Zeitgeist, the Movie, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Zeitgeist, the Movie was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Zeitgeist, the Movie, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 01:39, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikisource document

The Wikisource document s:Antonio_Villaraigosa by Antonio Villaraigosa is being considered for deletion, as it isn't immediately obvious that it is in the public domain. Cheers, John Vandenberg 05:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Hello Rockero,

Thank you for your reply concerning my request to add Chicano Forums as an external link to the Chicano article page.

I sent this follow up reply but I am not sure you received it:

Hello,

Yes, that was me on La Causa KPFK radio. I've also debated Fox News' John Gibson on the radio. But, honestly, I usually turn down these offers because either myself or my good friends wind up getting death threats. I recently turned down an opportunity to discuss (modern) Chicano Nationalism on Univision's Aqui y Ahorra.

The reason for my email, however, is because I noticed in Wikipedia's Chicano page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicano where "External links" are listed is a website "Network Aztlan."

I truly believe Chicano Forums has a right to be listed there as well. We, Chicanoforums.com, are the main Chicano activist website on the internet. Our subscriber list trumps Network Aztlan by at least twice as many subscribers, possibly three times as many. I know this because I was a member of their group for a very short period of time.

ChicanoForums.com works very closely with ANSWERLA and LA.Indymedia. No other Chicano website on the internet compares to our activism.

As a result, I believe ChicanoForums.com should be listed as an External link in Wikipedia's Chicano page.

Kind Regards,

Daniel Maldonado Webmaster ChicanoForums.com

                               ###

Rockero,

Chicano Forums are discussion forums. We do not hold prejudice any article source. We believe the community members are able to make this judgment themselves. Each article posted is judged on its own merits. Not every article posted gets to stay on our website. We have a team of moderators which I personally oversee. blatant racism and homophobia have no place in our forums.

I honestly feel that the Chicano Internet community is suffering a disservice on the Wikipedia Chicano article page by not allowing them to judge ChicanoForums.com for themselves. Our website does an immense amount of good for our migrant brothers and sisters. After all, this is precisely how we Chicanos came to be in the first place.

I am a Zacatec indigena of Chichimec heritage on my mother's side. My father was from Monterrey, Nuevo Leon. His grandparents were from Madrid, Spain. I am not a racist. I am not an anti-Semite nor am I homophobic. If you were to see my family, you would know that racism, anti-Semitism and homophobia are next to impossible since my family is made up of "all of the above."

Please reconsider adding ChicanoForums.com to Wikipedias "Chicano" article page "External Links."

Thank you,

Daniel Virtualchicano 13:02, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Daniel. I've just been busy. I will look into it at the first opportunity.--Rockero 00:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert

Do not delete additions of long comments on articles - they are used to keep articles off Special:Shortpages so that patrollers there don't have to keep seeing the same articles over and over. Carlossuarez46 23:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:MoctesumaEsparza.png

Thanks for uploading Image:MoctesumaEsparza.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks!

Como podrás leer, tengo muchos problemas con la sintaxis y la gramática en inglés, pero ello no me desanima. Gracias por el tip del libro, lo buscaré. Checa mis contribuciones y ojalá me puedas ayudar! Thanks! Greetings form Mexico City, --Galaver (talk) 10:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Está bien, échale ganas. A eso servimos los que hablamos inglés. Tendré que fijarme en tus contribuciones después de los exámenes finales, pero si escribes sobre temas como el rock nacional, la lectura me dará mucho gusto.--Rockero (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help Requested:

Subject: “A major edit should be reviewed to confirm that it is consensual to all concerned editors”. Thank you for reviewing my first Wikipedia article on East Los Streetscapers. There is much to learn about Wikipedia and writing an article. I am a bit overwhelmed. I am requesting your help by re-visiting this article and reviewing the edits and tags that are continuously being placed on it by user named “Blow of Light”. These include deleting the “references” and threatening to “prod” the article, etc. I would very much appreciate your evaluation of these edits so a consensus can be achieved. I want to preserve the integrity the article.
I welcome qualified edits that will improve the article..
Thank you for your help.
BSacknoosin (talk) 01:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look now, BSacknoosin. Hopefully, we won't have to worry about the possibility of it getting deleted anymore.--Rockero (talk) 06:07, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for your constructive editing and protection of East Los Streetscapers. You are a genuine and honorable editor working to preserve the goal of Wikipedia. Your competent work is much appreciated by all of us who are working in the same spirit of cooperation and goodwill! BSacknoosin (talk) 18:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome :) Wow, that's quite a list! And, hey, where's my margarita?  ;) csloat (talk) 05:18, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Little

I have added inline tags for the problems I see with the article, as well as a better summary on the talk page.

Whatever source you or anyone else used is of no particular interest to me. The article seems to be an unbalanced telling of the story in some places and needs citations from multiple reliable sources throughout. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SOS-logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:SOS-logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Su-excelencia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Su-excelencia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:36, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Voices-of-Tlatelolco.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Voices-of-Tlatelolco.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Camilo-torres.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Camilo-torres.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AGIF-poster.png

Thanks for uploading Image:AGIF-poster.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:El ministro y yo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:El ministro y yo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gonzales-DenverPL-002.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gonzales-DenverPL-002.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:OurLadyoftheAmericas.png

Thank you for uploading Image:OurLadyoftheAmericas.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:41, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude!

Joaquin Murietta (talk) 15:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bert Corona

Wow, you've done a great job with your draft article! I wish you had put it up before I got started. I just couldn't believe he didn't have a WP article, and I thought it was important to get one started. I'm rather busy too, but I'll give some thought to transferring sections of your work to my minimal start. You really ought to get the credit for it, however. Dwalls (talk) 21:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THE REAL MR.CAPONE-E

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cT6t2ksgLT8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smilenowcrynever (talkcontribs) 15:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK: Indigenous peoples in Ecuador

Hi. I've nominated Indigenous peoples in Ecuador, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on July 14, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, PFHLai (talk) 12:03, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On 20 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Indigenous peoples in Ecuador, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shiprock

Hi, Nice work! Here's an old school mechista writing from Germany. I would appreciate an editors view on the Shiprock article and discussionshiprock. Otherwise, I'm interested in the San Luis Valley and is revolutionary history, Oral tradition and construction of knowledge. Maybe I can help with Mexican and Chicano art edits. Or let me know if I can help somewhere. Diastar (talk) 09:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)diastar[reply]

Hello, may I draw your attention to Talk:Tia Chucha's Centro Cultural? --Cyfal (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the head's up. I will try to keep my eye on it.--Rockero (talk) 03:00, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On the San Ysidro Mcdonalds shooting

I recently added a few items to this article. I sited my scource as Time Life Books "Mass Murderers" which I would advise you to read as it is an excellent scource..Kaltenborn (talk) 01:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:KCSB.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:36, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Counterculture in Mexico

Hi, I just saw you had a 2005 post in the discussion page of this article asking to reming ou of it, so here goes. :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Counterculture#Mexico --SidiLemine 16:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

El Sombrero Award

El Sombrero Barnstar Award
You deserve this award for contributing to content of interest to the Latinos WikiProject. Outstanding contributions are generally about articles pertaining to Latinos and/or Hispanics in the United States as well as articles about Latin America. LatinoMuslim 02:13, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Stains (Los Angeles)

I have nominated The Stains (Los Angeles), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stains (Los Angeles). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Damiens.rf 18:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art#Los Angeles County Museum of Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there! howcheng {chat} 00:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Rockero's Day!

User:Rockero has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Rockero's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Rockero!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it.RlevseTalk 00:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquakes

Thanks. That was started some time ago now! We are only missing like a gazillion other earthquakes throughout the ages in Central America! Himalayan 11:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KCSB.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KCSB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
  • If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Greetings Rockero

Hello Rockero You Welcomed me to Wiki back in 2006 unfortunately I did not know it until today. March 20 2010 since I was trying to respond to msgs from another wiki admin. admonishing me about some Edits. and informing me HE had Deleted them. then I found your Welcome on TALK page. (don't know Wiki system yet)

I also saw your Latino Project has been declared inactive.

That's my problem too. too much to tell, not enough time to spare.

Greetings.

Check out Nalip.org I'm a founding Member.

Alc4Film (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Crlalogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crlalogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on California Rural Legal Assistance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --N419BH (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:25th-Chicano-Park-Day.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:25th-Chicano-Park-Day.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My CSD tag was placed in error. Someone did add a large quantity of information directly from the group's website, and this was the basis for my nomination as possible copyright infringement. However, I'd say the admin noticed my mistake and reverted the page to your edit. Either way it appears the offending edits have been removed from the page history. Thank you for bringing the issue to my attention. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia so any advice is greatly appreciated. --N419BH (talk) 14:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


WikiProject Mexican Americans Tagged As Inactive

Wikipedia:WikiProject Mexican-Americans was tagged as inactive in April 2010 - Did we all get burnout? Chicaneo (talk) 07:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess so.--Rockero (talk) 23:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]