User talk:Gogo Dodo

Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.

When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:

Use a descriptive subject/headline.
If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

If you are here to ask me why I deleted your article, please read the common reasons why I have deleted your article.

Archives

2006
April 2006 – June 2006 July 2006 – September 2006 October 2006 – December 2006

2007
January 2007 – March 2007 April 2007 – June 2007 July 2007 – September 2007 October 2007 – December 2007

2008
January 2008 – March 2008 April 2008 – June 2008 July 2008 – September 2008 October 2008 – December 2008

2009
January 2009 – March 2009 April 2009 – June 2009 July 2009 – September 2009 October 2009 – December 2009

2010
January 2010 – March 2010 April 2010 – June 2010 July 2010 – September 2010 October 2010 – December 2010

2011
January 2011 – March 2011 April 2011 – June 2011 July 2011 – September 2011 October 2011 – December 2011

2012
January 2012 – March 2012 April 2012 – June 2012 July 2012 – September 2012 October 2012 – December 2012

2013
January 2013 – March 2013 April 2013 – June 2013 July 2013 – September 2013 October 2013 – December 2013

2014
January 2014 – March 2014 April 2014 – June 2014 July 2014 – August 2014

2015
March 2015 April 2015 – June 2015 July 2015 – September 2015 October 2015 – December 2015

2016
March 2016 April 2016 – June 2016 July 2016 – September 2016 December 2016

2017
January 2017 – March 2017

2018
January 2018 – June 2018 July 2018 – September 2018 October 2018 – December 2018

2019
2019

2020
2020

2021
2021

2022
2022

2023
2023

Thanks!

You are speedy! [1] Active Banana (talk) 22:29, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

haha its cool dude

right on dude. i guess the back of my hand really didnt need a wikipedia... but it sure kept me from being bored all day at work.

but ya gotta admit. it was kinda funny (which coincidentally fits the guidelines for a G3 tag, not a G1 tag)

have a great date mate

Frostypb88 (talk) 22:50, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

also is there anyway you could email me a transcript of that artical. i think it was hillarious and im going to repost it on my facebook. message me if you could.

thanks!!

Frostypb88 (talk) 23:35, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

im going to take that as a you didnt think it was neerly as funny as i did. i dont see any reason you cant just copy and paste to an email.

Frostypb88 (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Duke of York's Royal Military School

Thank's for your help ref correcting OriginalFatTulip's vandalism of the Duke of York's Royal Military School page. Much appreciated.

Spicandspan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spicandspan (talk • contribs) 00:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is everyone reverting constructive edits to Kal Ho Naa Ho?

Can you please tell me what's so bad about the edit I made to Kal Ho Naa Ho that it needed to be reverted (three times so far)? I am only here to help. BollyJeff || talk 01:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tasha9713

Re your warning, you made a typo which is why the template didn't work I fixed it for you. Mjroots (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TEK

Hi, Gogo Dodo. The pages I created (User:TEK and User talk:TEK were intended to redirect to my user page and talk page, for convenience. Thanks, TEK (talk • e-mail) 19:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

R.V.C.Bodley

...which you deleted. I was asked to create this page for an IP (see T.E.Lawrence talk page.) I explained this situation on the discussion page. Might you restore it so the IP can build the article? Rumiton (talk) 07:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your header

Looks good. I copied it. :-) TEK (talk • e-mail) 14:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My friend's band needs a wiki page...

The Show. and you deleted it. What did I do wrong? Can you help me make one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by CjsRoxMySox (talk • contribs) 05:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:06, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me.

I recently created a page, and it's been deleted without reason or warning. Please explain?

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:26, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Alaur24[reply]

Hello, I was wondering why you deleted my newly created article. I put alot of work into it, and it wasn't finished. You left no reason why you deleted it. And I would like one. You can't just delete something without a reason for doing so. I followed the rules, so what is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaur24 (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could I try again?

Well I didn't actully finish it. Is it possible you could put it back? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alaur24 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please?

Well I wasn't finished it. Is it possible if you could put it back?

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I find that very unfair and disrespectful. I'm published, but not as a book. Instead online. Many people are so. I don't get it. All my hard work just went down the drain. Thanks. And the link? On other pages other people have done the total opposite to the rules, and still theirs isn't deleted. Wikipedia is ment to be for people to publish their own stuff, but how can we if people like you delete it.

Just put it back up!

--Alaur24 (talk) 07:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:55, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see your point. But I don't think you've looked into this enough.

On the website I've published it, I've won several rewards for my books, stories & Poems. Does that mean anything at all? --Alaur24 (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, on the website people can review you? So how 'bout that? :) --Alaur24 (talk) 08:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, okay. I give up. You win, smarty pants. Haha. Oh well... I guess I'll just have to wait then. Anyway, do you do anything besides Wikipedia? Your like on it all the time, haha. Or is that to much of a personal question to answer? :P

--Alaur24 (talk) 08:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. I'll stick around. What time is it for you? It's 6:56 PM here. =) --Alaur24 (talk) 08:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)alaur24[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 09:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the grumpysaurus page

please please please don't delete it, it's about my dad, he doesn't kno whow to use the internet, so the whole idea is seeing how long it takes for him to find the page, he picked the title, there is a £50 bet on so please please please don't delete it!!! let me know x —Preceding unsigned comment added by HCaliat (talk • contribs) 18:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WHAT IS THIS ALL ABOUT?

my page is a joke towards my father, that me and my siblings have made, he knows and thinks it's hilarious, and before we had a chance to show the grandparents, you have deleted it, it is not offencive otherwise i would not have done it!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by HCaliat (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

...for blocking this vandal. I frankly cannot understand how a person can waste his time on doing something like this. Funny isn't it... Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Yeh, I hope so. He is angry that Playback singer, an article on which he kept adding his sneaky vandalism, is protected now. Thanks again, Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:45, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

:(

i am not having a go but why did you delete my article why??? i made article for all my family and friends to see but you have gone and ruined it!! :( —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovemcdonalds (talk • contribs) 21:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be careful!

I see you're getting quite a few "enemies" there — be careful! TEK (talk • e-mail) 23:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't anything new for me as it has been going on for years. It goes with being an admin. I wouldn't call them "enemies" either, just upset people who think I've spoiled their fun by deleting their articles. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of E! Entertainment Television

E! Entertainment Television Movietime original files and docs support that Larry Namer, Brian Owens, Rick Portin, Mike Sobel, Bill Zaccheo, Mark Hale, and others launched the network. If you research Alan Mruvka you will discover that his own info, which he wrote on his Wiki bio, is ridiculous and exaggerated--how could he produce 20,000 hours of programming (much less one, he had nothing to do with production at Movietime) when the network was only on the air (20 hours a day plus infomercials) 11,000 hours before he was removed from Movietime!! And if born in 1967, did he really go to college and have a business background, and then come up with a network idea when he was 16 years old in 1984? Any sourced materials that support the above claims have been manipulated, probably by Mruvka. He supplied some of the money that started the network and was on the Board of Movietime until removed by the cable operators in early 1989. He had absolutely no operational responsibilities for Movietime, though he has erroneously claimed production responsibility in his self-penned Wikipedia bio. If you want pdf's of the Movietime launch, I can email them to you. ---- Pienza89 (talk) 14:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the Way, I forgot to add that most of the first two paragraphs of the E! history were written by me before I formally registered. I worked with all the people who launched the network, and named those most responsible for its successful launch. They were the operational heads of departments which created the concept and did the work and came up with the ideas and operation to do the launch, which was financed by a half dozen companies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the Greenwood press attribute which you refer to, which ironically is a channel description written by me when I worked in the U.K. for a cable company and described E! for our channel guide. At least put the following in, which is directly from the article and more accurate than letting two people take the credit for the significant idea, work, and contribution of others:

"launched by Larry Namer, Alan Mruvka, Brian Owens, and others on July 31 1987 as Movietime a low-budget service that....... " —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History of E! Entertainment Television -- your source for intro has been written inaccurately

The Anthony Slide book, 1991, does not say that Mruvka launched the channel, WHICH HE DIDN'T, but wrote that Mruvka co-founded the network, WHICH HE DID BECAUSE HE WAS THE FIRST INVESTOR: "Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications........."(page 94) Mruvka had no operational responsibility whatsoever for the network at its launch, or thereafter--he was on the Board of Directors and one of more than twenty shareholders at the network's launch. And author Slide had no facts for his info, as HBO and the cable TV operators did not invest in Movietime until one year after its launch. He probably had interviewed Mruvka or Namer and got the full story wrong.

This is what I got from googling ("The television industry: a historical dictionary mruvka"_ your source for the Mruvka claim on launching Movietime: http://www.uksuperweb.co.uk/tv.html to to #17 . Otherwise that google just goes circular to wikipedia . —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pienza89 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once more before the breach--A "launch of a network " is not the same as a "founding"

Once more, quoting directly from the page (94) of the source you are using, "The Television Industry: a historical dictionary" by Anthony Slide:

"Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications, American Television & Communications, Continental Cablevision, Cox Cable, News Channel Corp., United Cable, and Warner Brothers Studio,"(page 94)

This is not by any means the same as what you have now written in Wikipedia:

"E! Entertainment Television was founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka[1][2] on July 31, 1987 as Movietime, a service that aired movie trailers.........."

The channel was absolutely not founded in 1987 (it was incorporated as the Movietime business about a year earlier), but it was indeed launched on July 31, 1987 by a group you will or can not recognize, and I will try to find a true source about this. Meanwhile, if you must recognize the veracity here as the Slide book material, you would do best to complete the error by exactly writing/inserting what Slide wrote: "Founded by Larry Namer and Alan Mruvka, Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications, American Television & Communications, Continental Cablevision, Cox Cable, News Channel Corp., United Cable, and Warner Brothers Studio," notwithstanding that Slide did not have a clue about what he was writing here. Or you can let me recognize Mruvka, as one of many launchers, which I previously wrote to compromise and let him have his ego-rub.

Truly, take a look at the Alan Mruvka Wiki bio he wrote, which has many blatantly ridiculous claims--PLEASE LOOK AT IT. Mruvka writes "While with E!, Mruvka oversaw production of over 20,000 hours of programming ........" There are 8,760 hours in a year, so even if he had anything to do with production (which he did not), in the year and a half Mruvka was associated with the network, was he really 13,000 hours of the network, including the thousands of hours of paid infomercial hours late at night? And "Mruvka was born ....in 1968, " and "studied architecture at the University of Miami and New York’s Pratt Institute," so was he really just nineteen years old when Movietime launched." Lots of well-deserving people don't need Mruvka stealing their due. Pienza89 (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am learning how to work with Wikipedia, thank you, and I will dig out some archives and try to get this right when I have time. BUT meanwhile, I find some hypocrisy in your actions in that you insist from the Anthony Slide book that Namer and Mruvka founded the network, but now you won't complete the Anthony Slide's statement that HBO and others launched the network. If you believe me, then you'd accept my edit. If you don't believe me, then you would fully put in what the Slide source wrote. I don't get the inconsistency. If you use the source, then use the source and write "Movietime Channel was launched on July 31, 1987 by HBO, Warner Communications........." And if you don't, and believe what I have written, then go back to my edits. It should be "either, or" , and not your pick and choice from a written source and me--that's consistency and I would think that is what Wikipedia is trying to achieve in these "factual" disputes. Pienza89 (talk) 21:35, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:55, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote that the HBO group was in the second paragraph so there was no need to put the complete Slide reference into the first paragraph, but I COMPPLETELY WROTE THE SECOND PARAGRAPH. The HBO et al ownership is what I wrote, which I mentioned when I first wrote you. Yes I wrote that paragraph before I registered, because why register when I was the originator of almost all of the first two paragraphs? When Mruvka changed the opening and took out the other people's names who launched the network, I had to register to start editing that text. But again, the second paragraph was completely written by me so I stand by what I wrote: you either accept what I wrote or completely take out the (my) non-referenced material and put in the Slide page 94. Otherwise your "corrections" are illogical, using my material when it seems right to you but then not using it when it might be in conflict with an interview with Mruvka. Pienza89 (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"It appears to me that the second paragraph evolved (like most content on Wikipedia) from edits by multiple editors, not you as an anonymous IP alone." I am sorry that you tire so easily, but, again, I wrote all of the second paragraph except for the last sentence, so it did not stem from "multiple editors." You do a disservice when you challenge the veracity of a person who made a solid contribution and then had another person change it. There were no multiple editors in the second paragraph, and the HBO et al sentences, as well as all except the last, were mine, alone. So why don't you remove them, unless you continue to want it both ways, accepting what I write but then dropping what I write as you editorialize. Pienza89 (talk) 23:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

making a bio

how do i work the template ?...i tried to do a simple thing like changing my name on the page an it wouldnt make the change for me ...why is that ?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by YOUNGFLIZO201 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:47, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this is youngflizo201 ...i didnt kno hhow to reply back to a message ...but i had sent u a previous message about making a bio...an im not makin an autobiography...young flizo is an artist out of jersey that i support ...an i felt is though i wanted to do this for him ...an i dont kno how to do it ...i got everything written but i dnt kno how to edit the title and change it to "Young Flizo"..it still has the Category:Hip hop biography stubs title up there...and i also want to kno when wuld i be able to see this wikipedia article for him if i was to google his name like the other artist that have one ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by YOUNGFLIZO201 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dealing with vandals

I was just in a bit of an edit war with User talk:221.134.144.14 over Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham..., and I see over 20 messages on the talk page for vandalism, and a big message at the top that I don't really understand. Why can't they be stopped/blocked permanently? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bollyjeff (talk • contribs) 23:56, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:08, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I saw up to 7 warnings per month, plus I saw 6 "final" warnings and a 24 hour block. What does it take to do a full block, murder? :-) BollyJeff || talk 00:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're very kind

To remove my silly templated warning from your user talk. "Automated tool is no excuse" is 100% correct. Mea culpa. I don't know how it happened but it was obviously my fault. Thanks for your patience. Tiderolls 00:18, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To touch on another matter. Is this image on commons? I don't want to rev/del without a significant reason, but in light of the recent media rants I did not want to leave it unattended. The vandal meant the image as an insult but I don't know if it really is an insult. If you feel lead to action, please...go ahead. Tiderolls 00:47, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting my userpage

Thanks, that's fine, Yes "inappropriate images" indeed. Not that I'm not used to it in my (former) line of work here. I seem to have stumbled into quite a nest of litte thugs here. Herostratus (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that at least one person posting used what looks like a typical real life name. Given the nature of the material being posted, is this a problem I wonder. I guess nothing more can be done about it? Herostratus (talk) 04:05, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Show

I added new references. The album is on amazon and billboard, and this band is very important. they just recently played the O2 Arena, also played by Kelly Clarkson and Hole. They have also been mentioned in publications such as Jersey Beat and Village Voice. Although they are still an indie band, they have many radio stations internationally that have the Show in consistant rotation. The album has sold over 30,000 copies, and still is selling consistently. The Show are going to be huge pretty soon, so their wiki has to come now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CjsRoxMySox (talk • contribs) 03:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of "Elise Trent"

Hi! The page I created was for a college class and the lesson being taught was "self-branding." one of our assignments was to create a page about ourselves. I created the page NOT cause I wanted a page about myself but because I have to for class. As proof that we did the assignment, we have to email the link of the wikipedia page to our professor. I would highly appreciate you not deleting the page again as I cannot turning my homework if you do.

Thank you.

Elise —Preceding unsigned comment added by EliseMTrent (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I'm afraid that you'll have to create your page at another site, such as Wetpaint. Wikipedia is not the site to host pages about yourself, and there should be no exceptions to the regulations. Thanks, TEK (talk • e-mail) 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trollwatching

Thanks, I was starting to get sick of that guy. Though I'm expecting more, I don't think this is through yet. I'm going to go to bed now. Though if when I wake up I find all of my contributions have been blanked and my userpage has been moved to "Elektrik Shoos on wheels" I'm going to wave my virtual fist at you. :) Cheers, goodnight. elektrik SHOOS 08:32, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• 08:46, 10 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs | block) moved User talk:Elektrik Shoos to User talk:Elektrik Shoos on wheels (revert)

• 08:46, 10 July 2010 Gogo Dodo (talk | contribs | block) moved User:Elektrik Shoos to User:Elektrik Shoos on wheels (revert)

What? Oh, I'm sorry. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Partsearch Technologies

I dont understand how this page is advertising when its information. Admin Acroterion let me know about how this criteria and I have not copied any material directly from the company website. Please tell me how to make sure this page stays up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by John.neidhardt (talk • contribs) 18:05, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Page Craig Buie

Why did you delete my page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frecky04 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MACEO MAYS

Maceo Mays is a well known author to wit: can be verified. There has been many attempts to enter his personal bio including citations and references are deleted. How should we proceed so his information will not be deleted?

Sieberr1 (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Hon. Denise Chilton[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sock is back

Sadly enough, the sock is back and he started vandalising Playback singer again, removing sourced information and adding false. I think the page should be protected again for a longer period of time. Shahid • ^Talk2me 20:54, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spam on user talk pages

In regard to your block of Eatinqueens... I haven't been here long, but I've already seen this a couple of times now (new users spamming/advertising on their talk pages). Is this something that needs to be mentioned in policy (people think it's ok?) or is it merely a way that users think they can get away with through going unnoticed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gz33 (talk • contribs) 06:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed pretty common. I'm not sure exactly why though. Sometimes it is like you say, they are trying to avoid being noticed. Other times, I think they just don't know and think their talk page is a good place to put their ad. No policy addition is necessary as it is already covered in blocking policy. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:20, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I see its covered there now. I was looking at the Promotion policy and the link policies which seemed to give of the idea that they mainly meant for article space gz³³ (talk) 06:32, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The blocking policy allows for spam/advertising blocks no matter where they edit. The funniest spam I see is on Talk:Main Page. I really don't understand that one since there are big warning messages all over the place with that, but I guess some editors are just determined to place their ad. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any spam/vandalism here is pretty hard to understand really, what with how quickly it tends to disappear. I mean is a couple of seconds of display time really that worth it?gz³³ (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another sock

Clear sock puppet - Wisdom24 (talk · contribs). He opened his account on the 9th of July and thus can edit the page now. This is frankly becoming tedious. Shahid • ^Talk2me 15:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External Links to Reviews

Hi Gogo Dodo,

I was adding a few professional game reviews from this site - http://www.download-free-games.com/review/all/score-high/ - when I got flagged for external links.

Would it be appropriate to keep adding links to these reviews on relevant pages?

Thanks,

JimTheGamer (talk) 21:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

list of bhangra bands

why have you edited it and included hip hop acts which are NOT LIVE BHANGRA BANDS?

stop vandalizing proper pages dude

JOSH? a bhangra band

you gotta be kidding me

do you even know what bhangra is you little folkhopper —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noxiousnews (talk • contribs) 02:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:56, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ufuoma Ejenobor

hello Gogo, thank you for you contributions and correction on the Ufuoma Ejenobor page. it shows that we still have committed editors on the site. But it would be more appropriate to check on facts before completely deleting an article especially if the articles are not easily verified from your side of the world. if there are problems regarding a page, they should be discussed and PROPERLY VERIFIED before deletion. we could work together on building and correcting articles in which language and other factors are lacking. thank yo very muchAnnaadoms (talk) 02:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?Annaadoms (talk) 05:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:08, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the edit for feburary has already been handled yeah? (i hope i am not the confused one now) there were other links on the page ..maybe you werent patient enough to read them anyway its a lot of work now starting to search for them all over again. take your time to read through them all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaadoms (talk • contribs) 05:26, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the February edit has been attended to already. there are reliable links there..you just weren't patient enough to read through them all. it would take a long while to source through for them again. let me know if there are other correctionsAnnaadoms (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gogo, consider having a look at the history Ufuoma Ejenobor. Annaadoms does not seem to grasp some of the rules here, as far as puffery, reliable sources, etc. are concerned and it's getting a bit tiresome. I mean, even if this, "She also earned a badge as the school’s Head girl 1998/99 session," were relevant, it would still need verification. We have either a fan or an autobiography. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I also think I hear some quacking; time will tell. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 15:45, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like your opinion

While out on my nightly patrol, I came across an odd page. I would like your opinion/decision on what should happen. The anomaly in question is Subash Sinchuari. I was going to add an A7 tag, but I checked the history. Using the very first version, [2], I wouldn't add a CSD tag (I'm more cautious than most when it to CSD tags, though). The strangest part is that the only non-bot to edit it, and cut out 95 percent of the content, is the initial author. The page isn't truly blank so neither did I tag it for G7. I'm just not sure how to handle it. CSD? Prod? If there's someone/someplace you want me to ask, lemme know. TheTito ^Discuss 10:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Message from WikiEditor90546

this company is significant to the United States of America and it will be on Wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor90546 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:37, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jelin george Fashion Designer

Hi

I had contributed and article as she is upcoming fashion designer n i had submit it do help me how can i contribute on wikepedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alfreddsouza (talk • contribs) 05:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:37, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Gogo

I repent.

Oh yeah and what did I get caught for exactly? Cause I did some bad stuff but I'm clean from now on, I swear. Wouldn't want to get banned for some prior misdeeds! I can assure you - no bad edits (NBE) post 2:39 AM Central Time July 20, 2010! Oh and good job on all the medals you have on your main page - I hope to be like you one day! :) 66.112.225.187 (talk) 07:36, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]