Jump to content

User talk:Sf5xeplus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Johnadonovan (talk | contribs) at 12:23, 25 September 2010 (→‎Royal Dutch Shell: Added: Hello, please be advised that I have posted a further response in the same location.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Sf5xeplus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Chemicalinterest (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Magnet

I answered again on the section. Cheers. --Chemicalinterest (talk) 23:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Waitby, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.waitbyschool.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:29, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... of course, if you happen to be the author of the text on the waitbyschool website then there is no problem. If not, then perhaps you should rephrase that bit of the article. I look forward to your article on Smardale. Dbfirs 18:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
... (later) Sorry, I hadn't read both carefully. I agree that the bot seems to have got it wrong. I can't see any possible objection to what you wrote in the article. Dbfirs 21:00, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget that if you change a title to add "The", you need to make sure it's got a "DEFAULTSORT" so that it sorts under the first main word rather than under "The". I've added it to this one. PamD (talk) 22:49, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry and thanks - I knew that, but forgot. Sf5xeplus (talk) 23:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See reaction on my talk page

Hi, You made a comment on my talk page regarding GNER and Port of Hull. Don't know if you watch my page for feedback, and if not: please see the feedback. (And feel free to delete this message after reading - no need to keep it for future reference) JanT (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marsh Lane

I think my edit was ver clear. You made an edit which made Wikipedia confirm to you point of view you undid valid work. Itis you that needs the lecture in Civility.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 16:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a very clear personal attack. You should also read WP:AGF. Sf5xeplus (talk) 18:50, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And you should read the bit that says "and exhortations to "Assume Good Faith" can themselves reflect negative assumptions about others" --Kitchen Knife (talk) 18:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You wrote This was valid before you editied it. The arrogance of and insularity of Yorkshire people is just confirmed. - who has made negative assumptions - you or me ? Sf5xeplus (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well perhaps you could come up with a better explanation of the edit then?--Kitchen Knife (talk) 19:19, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's quite simple - the Leeds station has "Marsh" in it's title, I put a hatnote to the other station ie this version
I considered doing the reverse ie putting a hatnote to the Leeds station on the Bootle station article, but having a message that read:
For the Marsh Lane station in Leeds, see Leeds Marsh Lane railway station
in an article titled Bootle New Strand railway station seemed nonsensical and probably confusing to readers. Does that make sense?Sf5xeplus (talk) 19:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It would if the Leeds station was still in existence.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
? Go away - you've already insulted me for no good reason. Sf5xeplus (talk) 19:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just because I find your reasoning flawed!--Kitchen Knife (talk) 19:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, Go away I'm not interested in talking to you. If you don't have anything that will result in a constructive contribution to wikipedia I will consider any further posts on this page Wikipedia:Harassment.
Sorry to be so grumpy- but your first message to me was clearly insulting, and contrary to WP:NPA .Sf5xeplus (talk) 19:38, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bold edit revert - infobox

Hello, Sf5xeplus. You have new messages at D'oh!'s talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

August 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Priestman Brothers. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 20:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was just about to do that myself and (on second thought) move Cumae (Italy) back to Cumae. Seems to be the primary usage after all, so my first move wasn't such a good idea. Were you also planning to move that back? Fut.Perf. 21:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone seems to have done it for me, hope it's okay now - I forgot to check which 'AFPS' the link was referring to. Calorus (talk) 11:07, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, now that Permanent way is a disambiguation page, could you help re-point the links that need fixing per WP:FIXDABLINKS? (Especially since the difference between the articles is a bit murky; we could use your help.) Thanks, --JaGatalk 09:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Terry Farrell

I just asked a friend on flickr to send me (via flickrmail) Terry Farrell's wikipedia article and I noticed could open her wikipedia article now. So, maybe flickr has finally changed their system to allow their users to open articles whose url links end with brackets. When I had that problem, it was 1 full year ago. So, I would say that maybe flickr has solved the problem...but thank you for your kind suggestion. Now I'll see if someone would just license an image of her freely. Best regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :)

Thanks a lot for the kind words. My memory is pretty hazy here (I don't remember what I had for breakfast this morning, let alone what I did to Wikipedia a couple of years ago) but as I recall I did a lot of work on the articles on railway sleepers and King's Lynn railway station. Away from railways, I thought it would be hilarious to turn a short article about a fish into something absurdly well-referenced, so that's what I did. Because I'm just THAT COOL, buddy. Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 18:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you revisit your recent addition: Permanent way (history)#Rail fastenings please? There is a semi-colon in the middle of the sentence, and also a mention of 'strap rails' (what are they ?), and the meaning of the sentence is not very clear. Thanks -- EdJogg (talk) 12:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rail fastening

I'm afraid I can't tell any more about this rail fastening than that I found it close to my hometown, Radevormwald in Germany. Somewhere at the former Wuppertalbahn if I remember right. -- Ies (talk) 14:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Dutch Shell

Please be advised that I have posted a response to you on the Royal Dutch Shell talk page: --Johnadonovan (talk) 12:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please be advised that I have posted a further response.--Johnadonovan (talk) 16:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, please be advised that I have posted a further response in the same location. --Johnadonovan (talk) 12:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soren Hjorth

Hi! Please do feel free to replace that red link with a proper article. The previous versions were done by a couple of kids getting their marching orders from another website. Thanks for letting me know.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inline engine

Hmmmm. I think my confusion comes from the disam page, which makes it sound like the other use is for automotive engines only. Sorry about that. Thanks for the corrections. --User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 11:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]