Jump to content

Talk:Comcast

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.41.154.157 (talk) at 21:14, 2 January 2011 (→‎Controversy section a little bit big?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Cross promotion

Where can someone place that the comcsst digital cable remote made an appearance on CBS's Big Brother 12 on the live August 5th, 2010 eviction show during a video segment?--Cooly123 01:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

NPOV

I added an NPOV tag because after reading through the Controversy Section, it really does seem rather biased...


--Mooshykris (talk) 13:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I added a line about the Comcast Digital Cares Team and two references to show Comcast's recent efforts at improving customer service. Will look into any other recent efforts as well as recent failures. --JenniferOrtiz (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

XFinity

How do we clean up the article to replace Comcast with XFinity cleanly? CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about the company, whose full name is "Comcast Corporation". XFINITY is just a brand name for certain digital services. - BilCat (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
LOL Good... The previous editor caught me off guard.... I'm glad we don't have to clean a mess like that. Don't mind me... I get confused easily  :-D CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy section a little bit big?

I know Comcast isn't everyones favorite company but the controversy section takes up half the page most of these can probably be moved to a separate page and just leave the most controversial ones.

Plus the Level 3 dispute is overly simplified and one sided. Several sites have articles that go multiple pages in depth on the situation and show its not just Level 3 being a victim.

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/comcastlevel3.ars

It really affects the neutrality of the article.