Talk:Comcast
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comcast article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Comcast. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Comcast at the Reference desk. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Comcast article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 60 days |
Cross promotion
Where can someone place that the comcsst digital cable remote made an appearance on CBS's Big Brother 12 on the live August 5th, 2010 eviction show during a video segment?--Cooly123 01:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
NPOV
I added an NPOV tag because after reading through the Controversy Section, it really does seem rather biased...
--Mooshykris (talk) 13:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
I added a line about the Comcast Digital Cares Team and two references to show Comcast's recent efforts at improving customer service. Will look into any other recent efforts as well as recent failures.
--JenniferOrtiz (talk) 05:22, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
XFinity
How do we clean up the article to replace Comcast with XFinity cleanly? CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- The article is about the company, whose full name is "Comcast Corporation". XFINITY is just a brand name for certain digital services. - BilCat (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- LOL Good... The previous editor caught me off guard.... I'm glad we don't have to clean a mess like that. Don't mind me... I get confused easily :-D CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Controversy section a little bit big?
I know Comcast isn't everyones favorite company but the controversy section takes up half the page most of these can probably be moved to a separate page and just leave the most controversial ones.
Plus the Level 3 dispute is overly simplified and one sided. Several sites have articles that go multiple pages in depth on the situation and show its not just Level 3 being a victim.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/12/comcastlevel3.ars
It really affects the neutrality of the article.